Showing posts with label By Jan Aldrich. Show all posts
Showing posts with label By Jan Aldrich. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 15, 2021

UFOs / UAP: We Don't Need No Stinking Science!

UFOs / UAP: We Don't Need No Stinking Science
SCIENCE, SCIENCE. WE DON'T NEED NO STINKING SCIENCE!

AND NOW HISTORY WE SURE DON'T NEED NO SMELLY HISTORY.




     Harsh words but they need to be said.

Hour Zero is now in 2004. Ufology was at one time supposed to be multidisciplinary. Not anymore. We have intelligence gurus and academics eschewing history. Way to go!

Read Larry Hancock's UNIDENTIFIED: The National Intelligence Problem of UFOs, he said the original government UFO Program was an intelligence failure. Second verse same as the first. We are looking at, according to the government, “144 aircraft
Jan Aldrich
By Jan Aldrich
The UFO Chronicles
12-14-21
sightings” and at the University of Wyoming there are about 3000 such reports. During the Vietnam War Projects Lethal Chaser and Have Fear were instrumented and nearly all unexplained. These incidents were not in Project Blue Book nor submitted to the Condon Committee.

French police Captain Dominque Weinstein's Aircraft/UFO Encounters catalog contained over 1200 historical entries. Oh, but Aerospace expert, James Oberg said there were some Soviet/Russian missile and satellite launches that were in the catalog apparently invalidating the whole work. Let's see, so all science is perfect from the very beginning. There is never a time when data needs to be sifted and mistakes and invalid items eliminated. Of course not. Pains were taken to eliminate duplications, errors, and conventional explanations; Oberg pointing out errors is prudent. Trying to say the whole effort was useless is not a valid proposition.

The French space agency CNE was able to use Weinstein's catalog to make some conclusions about UFOs.

Flight Safety: Weinstein also produced a catalog of about 600 cases on close approaches to aircraft, buzzings, pacings, crossing paths and near misses. Some of these incidents were observed by air traffic controllers, visually and or on radar and investigated by government experts. So will they not look back at these incidents? Flight Safety should not be examined prior to 2004?

Satellite detection: The first known possible satellite detection was is 1967 by government personnel and submitted to the Condon Committee but never acknowledged. Former DNI Ratcliffe also said there were satellite detections. Such detections were not acknowledged in the June 2021 report. Are these detections before 2004?

Historical Instrument Detections: Project Blue Book and post Project Blue Book records contain radar scope photographs and eferences exist for gun camera films. Moreover, Cape Canaveral launch detection records exist.

Some possible instrumentation sightings: The Condon Committee submitted 120 reports to the Allsky camera Prarie Meteor Network. There were some photographs at the same time as UFO incidents. None of these photos are mentioned in detail in the Condon Report. The NORAD computers store uncorrelated targets. Attempts to pay for these records to compare with UFO incidents has been requested under FOIA, but costs to UFO advocates proved prohibitive. If the government were to use these resources, to investigate historical incidents, there wouldn’t be, or shouldn’t be a cost to civilians. Although the Condon Committee members met with NORAD there were no records used by the Committee.

Brain Damage to Air Crews: This last category is purely anecdotal. Supposedly, some air Crews are showing brain symptoms similar to Havana Syndrome which would indicate a bad state actor involved. However, looking at history in WWII, a whole bomber crew was hospitalized with debilitating headaches after a UFO encounter; the case was investigated years afterwards by Dr. James McDonald. A decade later the pilot was involved with a UFO incident witnessed from the ground. He experienced the same severe headache. In any case, many people are still alive in regards to the aircraft crew cases, mentioned above. Here we could determine subjects for controlled medical investigations. If these rumors are true, do such cases start before 2004?

Recommendations:

1. Include air safety and control agencies in any UFO investigations.

2. Include DOE and all DOD nuclear and Special Weapons Agencies in data collections, including the Nuclear Regulatory Agency.

3. Have all government agencies disgorge and declassify all historical UFO data. (This would include agencies like federal police officers, guard forces, civilian and other law and regulatory agents. Included would be correctional facilities, fire watchers, fire fighters, Border Patrol and Custom Agents, etc. Finally, all scientific agencies, contractors, DHS and subordinate agencies must take part.

Tuesday, August 04, 2020

UFOs / UAP and The Hot Mess at the New York Times

UFOs / UAP and The Hot Mess at the New York Times


     After listening to Kean and Blumenthal on how hard they had to work to get articles in the NYT, I am completely unimpressed by the latest two articles.

First, whatever was said in the articles caused many of the UFO crowd to go wild saying the Pentagon has admitted they had crashed ET saucers, Lazar is vindicated, the Roswell incident was confirmed. None of the above were exactly in the article. Speculation overran what was written. If the article was not so sloppily written perhaps other newspapers and radical UFO fans would not be so encouraged to jump off the deep end.

By Jan Aldrich
The UFO Chronicles
8-3-20
The retraction on the Harry Reid quote was the first crack. Then, Reid issued a much more conservative statement.

Eric Davis is on record as opposed to Lazar’s story.

Davis is identified as a consultant to the Pentagon.  What actually was missing are several important details. Was he a current consultant? Was he a consultant on UFO?  Did he really say there were crashed saucers known to the Pentagon?

Being a subcontractor on a government contract does not mean someone is a contractor to the Pentagon. Being on the contractor's employment rolls does not mean someone is a contractor. Maybe a fine point, but necessary in this discussion.

While the authors said elsewhere that they were in contact with the NYT Washington bureau. They couldn't identify what committees Eric Davis testified in front of, but I think the Washington bureau may not have been able to find out what was said at the hearings. They, however, probably could confirm what committees took Davis’ testimony.

Former Deputy Asst. Def Sec for Intelligence, Chris Mellon said rather that Davis gave out leads and sources of potential information.

Finally, the follow-up article on the UFO beliefs is ironic as it quotes Margaret Mead. I don't think they knew that Mead advocated serious study of UFOs after another well-known anthropologist and former OSS operative, Dr. Carlton Coon joined NICAP.  In our scanning of the CUFOS files we have not yet encountered correspondence with Mead or Coon.

The articles were not news items.  There was adequate time to vet the articles unlike breaking news.

Monday, July 22, 2019

Are UFOs a Threat?



Are UFOs a Threat?

A Moment in History or The More Things Change the More They Remain the Same

     Various parties are now implying that there may be a threat from UFOs. History shows that in the late 1950s and early 1960s a threat from or about UFOs was addressed in an attempt to obtain Congressional hearing by the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP)

Note that the NICAP Confidential Congressional Report cites the 1958 encounter of a USAF C-54D aircraft over the Pacific.
Jan Aldrich
By Jan Aldrich
The UFO Chronicles
7-15-19
UFOs Secrecy Dangers & Evidence 1960

UFOs Secrecy Dangers & Evidence 1960 (Pg 2)
Congressional Record - NICAP UFO Report (-Cont) 8-31-1960 UFOs Secrecy Dangers & Evidence 1960 (Pg 1)
UFOs Secrecy Dangers & Evidence 1960 (Pg 2)
UFOs Secrecy Dangers & Evidence 1960 (Pg 3) UFOs Secrecy Dangers & Evidence 1960 (Pg 4)UFOs Secrecy Dangers & Evidence 1960 (Pg 5)
UFOs Secrecy Dangers & Evidence 1960 (Pg 6) UFOs Secrecy Dangers & Evidence 1960 (Pg 7) UFOs Secrecy Dangers & Evidence 1960 (Pg 8)
UFOs Secrecy Dangers & Evidence 1960 (Pg 9) UFOs Secrecy Dangers & Evidence 1960 (Pg 10)UFOs Secrecy Dangers & Evidence 1960 (Pg 11)
-click and or right click on image(s) to enlarge-

This intelligence report of the C-54 in which the pilot felt he was fired on by a UFO is missing from Project Blue Book files. [Donald] Keyhoe did obtain a copy from an AF intelligence Lt. Col. in HQ USAF Intelligence. Keyhoe during his career had a number of informants within the Air Force. A Republic Aviation Corp. official, James Brewster, III, who attended many internal USAF intelligence briefings slipped Keyhoe UFO information. Major Dewey Fournet Pentagon UFO project monitor, met with Keyhoe on Jan. 5, 1953 after he resigned from the USAF and gave Keyhoe a rundown of the situation inside AF Intelligence. Capt, Robert White, the Pentagon spokesman on UFO from 1953-1957 helped Keyhoe with research, leads, and unclassified documents. He acted well beyond his public relations duties and was a UFO advocate in secret. An intelligence officer within Air Force intelligence slipped Keyhoe a number of unclassified UFO reports including the 1958 C-54 report. I believe, but have not yet verified, that this officer had an interesting UFO sighting in Germany just before his assignment to AF intelligence. This officer is probably the source of the Dec 1956 Japan intelligence report in which an F-86 fighter experience electronic and radar interference while trying to get a radar lock on a UFO. The formal intelligence report does not exist in PBB files, only messages describing the encounter. NICAP did have the report on Air Information Intelligence Report.

Monday, February 11, 2019

Journalists Should Ask These Questions Re AATIP and TTSA



AATIP

"When everyone is thinking the same, no one is thinking."

     At least no one will ever accuse me of thinking the same. Frankly, I have other fish to fry, but I feel some comments and questions regarding AATIP and TTSA need to be put forth. Journalists should ask these questions, but with the notable exception of Billy Cox, most journalists are clueless about UFOs. Billy using his experience and sources kept me from walking off a cliff more than once.
Jan Aldrich
By Jan Aldrich
The UFO Chronicles
2-8-19
1). How much time did AATIP spend on UFOs? 1%, 5%, 25% etc., etc.

2). What was the mission of AATIP? What did they do?

3). Where did they fit in the DIA wire diagram? To whom did they report?

4). There are finding about UFOs or AAVs or whatever, how were these finding reached?

5). If these finding are more than smoke, why is TTSA targeting the UFO “community” which is known to have low funds, little influence and many members who demonstrate poor critical thinking skills? Instead why haven’t TTSA targeted academics at MIT, UCLA, Berkeley and other such institutions with the AATIP findings?

6). Supposedly, Senator McCain asked for a list of all AATIP papers. Now in the beginning we were told that there was a 400+ page history of UFOs. Where is this? What is the Unclassified title of this publication or report? Approximate title would be helpful.

7). If UFO reports were vetted before they reached AATIP, what agency(ies) did this vetting? On whose authority was such material collected?

8). In an interview with Leslie Kean, C. Mellon said he knew of no UFO investigation within DOD, and he should have known of such. When AATIP came out, he said he was aware of it and its chief. How are these apparent contradictions resolved?

Comments.

Please don’t tell me that this guy or that guy answered the above questions in softball interviews posed by journalists or people who are not knowledgeable or seemingly can’t articulate obvious questions or follow-ups. No appeals to authority! Some people associated with AATIP and TTSA have unusual beliefs or accept dubious UFO events or theories. It is worrisome that UFO history seemed to have been ignored, a problem in previous investigations, Project Blue Book, Robertson Panel, University of Colorado, etc. I really don’t care to hear any more about, “It’s classified.” If so, tell us who we would ask to get an answer. This isn’t Keyhoe and NICAP feeling around it the dark trying to get straight answers. This involves people who supposedly know the answers but can’t speak about them.

* Curt Collins asked me to put together these comments and questions I’ve asked elsewhere.

VISIT JAN'S WEBSITE, PROJECT 1947

See Also:

Congressional Hearings into UFOs Called For, By Former Senator Harry Reid | VIDEO

The Nimitz UFO Encounters – New Military Eyewitnesses Interview

The Nimitz UFO Encounters – A Short Documentary Film

"UFOs Are Real," says Former DoD, Intellgence Officer

Secret UFO Program Recorded Encounters with Unknown Objects | INTERVIEW – VIDEO

Nevada Senator Fought To Save Secret UFO Program | VIDEO

Pentagon UFO Study Examined UFO Activity at Nuclear Missile Sites Says Former U.S. Senator Harry Reid

What the Government Knows About UFOs | Interview with Harry Reid

New Interview with Navy Pilot Who Chased Tic-Tac UFO – Pt 2 | VIDEO

New Interview with Navy Pilot Who Chased Tic-Tac UFO – Pt 1 | VIDEO

Harrowing Encounter Between F/A-18s and UFO; Detailed Official Report Surfaces

Executive Summary Report: UFO Encounter with the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group

AATIP / AAWSAP - A Tale of Two Programs

UFOs are Suddenly a Serious News Story

UFO Info Wars

UFOs May Have Attempted Rendezvous With Giant Undersea Object | VIDEO

Executive Summary Report: UFO Encounter with the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group

Confidential Military Report on 'Tic Tac UFO Event' | VIDEO

Long-Awaited Government-Funded UFO Reports Now In The Public Domain

Documents Prove Secret UFO Study | VIDEO

AATIP or AAWSAP?

Dr. Eric W. Davis, of NASA's Breakthrough Physics Propulsion Project, Discussed UFOs During Lecture | VIDEO

UFO Research By NASA Affiliated Physicist Dr. Eric W. Davis is Confirmed By Colleague

Dr Eric Davis, Physicist, Explains Why Scientists Won't Discuss Their UFO Interests

Deciphering The Pentagon UFO Program and Release of The UFO Videos

BREAKING: Formerly Secret UFO Program NOT Called, 'Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program' (AATIP)?

'Getting the Mainstream Media to Approach the UFO Puzzle as Legitimate News

OREGON UFO EVENT: Air Traffic Control Audio Tapes Released via FOIA Request

What the Government Knows About UFOs | Interview with Harry Reid

3rd AATIP Video & the Pentagon UFO Study – Interview with Luis Elizondo | VIDEO

Third Government UFO Video Released | VIDEO

The Military Keeps Encountering UFOs – Why Doesn’t the Pentagon Care? | VIDEO

UFO Research Gets New Life By Way of The Pentagon's Mysterious Project

BREAKING NEWS: The Pentagon’s Mysterious UFO Program Revealed | VIDEO

Ex-Military Official Details Pentagon's Secret UFO Hunt | INTERVIEW – VIDEO

Billionaire Robert Bigelow's Decades-Long Obsession With UFOs

Navy F-18 'Gimbal UFO' Video Explained?

Post Pentagon’s UFO Research Program Revelations – Skeptics Regroup

Understanding the Science of UFOs and Space Time Metric Engineering | VIDEO

UFO-Pentagon FOIA Request Delayed

BREAKING NEWS: The Pentagon’s Mysterious UFO Program Revealed | VIDEO

Ex-CIA Chief - Keep Studying UFOs

Herald Tribune Reporter, Billy Cox Queries CIA On Chase Brandon's Roswell UFO Claims

Luis Elizando Former Head of Secret Pentagon UFO Program Describes Five Categories of UFOs | INTERVIEW

While Waiting for the Next New York Times UFO Bomb to Drop

Navy Pilot, Who Chased A UFO, Says ‘We Should Take Them Seriously’

UFO Legacy: What Impact Will Revelation of Secret Government Program Have?

UFO Reports at Nuclear Missile Sites and The Pentagon UFO Program

Astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson Discusses The Pentagon UFO Program on Colbert | VIDEO

Ex-Military Official Details Pentagon's Secret UFO Hunt | INTERVIEW – VIDEO

Pentagon's Secret UFO Search, Stanton Friedman Weighs In | INTERVIEW – VIDEO

What the New York Times UFO Report Actually Reveals

'Second' Navy Pilot Comes Forward Re UFO Encounter | INTERVIEW – VIDEO

'The Pentagon’s Newly Revealed UFO Research Program' – What a Week!

On the Trail of a Secret Pentagon U.F.O. Program

UFO-Pentagon Story Reflects Fundamental Problems

Pentagon UFO Study Examined UFO Activity at Nuclear Missile Sites Says Former U.S. Senator Harry Reid

UFO Study Focused on U.S. Military Encounters

PENTAGON UFO PROGRAM: 'Recovered Material' From UFOs Discussed By Leslie Kean | INTERVIEW – VIDEO

Senator Reid Discusses Secret UFO Program | INTERVIEW – VIDEO

Navy Pilot Recounts UFO Encounter | INTERVIEW – VIDEO

Aliens, UFOs, Flying Discs and Sightings -- Oh My!

Secret Programs, U.S. Senators and Money, Who Wants to Talk UFOs Now?

Navy Pilot Talks: The UFO Jammed Their Radar — ‘It Accelerated Beyond Any Airplane We Have’

BREAKING NEWS: The Pentagon’s Mysterious UFO Program Revealed | VIDEO

Navy UFO Encounter: 'It Accelerated Like Nothing I’ve Ever Seen’ – F/A-18F Pilot | VIDEO

Secret UFO Pentagon Program Explained By Leslie Kean | INTERVIEW – VIDEO

Secret Pentagon UFO Program Spent Millions




REPORT YOUR UFO EXPERIENCE


Monday, July 10, 2017

Hynek’s Last Contract with the Project Blue Book UFO Program

Bookmark and Share

J Allen Hynek

     Mark O’Connell’s The Close Encounters Manexamines the astronomer J. Allen Hynek’s scientific career and his parallel work in UFO research. O’Connell shows how Hynek, a skeptical advisor to the US Air Force’s UFO Projects SIGN, Grudge, and Blue Book, became an advocate for serious UFO studies and the founder the Center for UFO Studies.

Project 1947 looks at the Hynek’s last contract with the USAF Project Blue Book UFO program. It wasn’t to be Hynek’s last USAF contract. After the Condon report, Hynek submitted a proposal to Col. George R.
Jan Aldrich
By Jan Aldrich
The UFO Chronicles
7-7-17
Weinbrenner, Commander of the Foreign Technology Division at Wright-Patterson AFB to do a special study of UFOs. Col. Weinbrenner had invited such a proposal, perhaps as a diplomatic sop to Hynek at the end of his last contract or perhaps as a completely serious offer. However, indications were that Weinbrenner was supposedly sympathetic to UFO research. What the result of the Hynek’s proposal was continues to be unknown, but he was contracted by the Air Force for some work for the next four years 1970-1974.

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

UFO Radar Intelligence Summary IR 29-52 – Korean War 1951-1952

UFO Radar Sketch IR-29-52 (6-25-1952)
"... there were a lot of good UFO reports coming in from Korea. Fighter pilots reported seeing silver-colored spheres or disks on several occasions, and radar tracked unidentified targets ..."

     “In June 1952 the Air Force was taking the UFO problem seriously. One of the reasons was that there were a lot of good UFO reports coming in from Korea. Fighter pilots reported seeing silver-colored spheres or disks on several occasions, and radar in Japan, Okinawa, and in Korea had
By Jan L. Aldrich
Project 1947
11-14-16
tracked unidentified targets." Capt. Edward J. Ruppelt, head of the US Air Force Project Blue Book 1951-1953.

During his tour in the Far East, Mr. Wallace Bush, Electronics Engineer, Classified Reconnaissance Branch, Director of Intelligence, Headquarters, Far East Air Forces, had collected information on UFO radar incidents, re-interviewed witnesses, produced updated Air Intelligence Information Reports on some cases, kept records of meetings in which UFOs were discussed, and evaluated UFO radar reports. He turned the collected information over to Air Technical Intelligence Liaison Office, Far East Air Force.

Captain Charles Malven compiled the information into Intelligence Report 29-52 sent to both the Air Technical Intelligence Center at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base and the Director of Intelligence, Headquarters, US Air Force. In this report Project 1947 discusses the activity of the Air Technical Intelligence Liaison Office and the 6004th Air Intelligence Service Squadron in UFO investigations during the Korean War.

The USS Philippine Sea -1955
The USS Philippine Sea in the western pacific - 1955
Background on some of the 13 incidents discussed in the 11 July 1952 IR 29-52, are quoted from Dr. J. Allen Hynek’s The UFO Experience, Martin Shough’s RADCAT, and Phillip Robertson, Independent Aerial Phenomena Research.

The late Larry Fawcett had located a retired Naval Commander who served in the Combat Control Center on the USS Philippine Sea during the February 2, 1952 UFO incident and Dr. Hynek had a set of Naval intelligence documents on the incident which are not in the Project Blue Book files which he used in his presentation on the incident. Some other Air Force, Navy, and Marine radar reports case files for incident discussed in IR 29-52 accompany the article.

Monday, August 08, 2016

USAF Considers Shooting Down a UFO with a Missile – 1952

USAF Considers Shooting Down a UFO with a Missile

Have we Visitors From Space – Life Magazine 1952

     Brigadier General William Garland in a 1952 Memorandum for Record (MFR) told a LIFE magazine researcher that the US Air Force had considered using a missile to shoot down a UFO.
By Jan L. Aldrich
Project 1947
8-7-16
Robert Powell, Scientific Director of the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) found two MFR recording LIFE magazine researcher, Robert Ginna’s visit to the Pentagon in February 1952. Ginna met with a number of high ranking officers and intelligence officials gathering more research data for his article which was published in April. Among the general officers who helped him during his visit in addition to Brigadier General Garland were Brigadier Sory Smith, in charge of Public Information, and General Joseph F. Carroll, Deputy Inspector General and Director of Special Investigations. With their help, he was able to interview Lt. Col. Doyle Rees, for Commander of the 17th Air Force Office of Special Investigation, in New Mexico, and who had worked with Dr. Lincoln LaPaz, University of New Mexico expert on meteors. Both Dr. LaPaz and Lt. Col. Doyle Rees had investigated numerous UFO cases and green fire ball incidents in the southwest US. Also, involved in these meeting was Lt. Col. Dewitt Searles, public information UFO spokesman going back years, and a civilian Mrs. Helen Barber, managing editor of the classified internal publication, Air Intelligence Digest, who also figured in a number of Air Force Headquarters UFO investigations. General Garland arranged for a visit to the Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) where Ginna could confer with Lieutenant Edward Ruppelt newly appointed chief of the USAF’s revitalized UFO investigative project which would shortly be renamed Project Blue Book. Read more at Project 1947….

Thursday, November 20, 2014

First Update of the Catalogue of UFOs/USOs

Bookmark and Share

USO Emerging from Ocean

Introduction to the First Update of the Catalogue
of UFOs/USOs Reported by Seagoing Services


By Jan L. Aldrich
www.project1947.com
© 2013-14
When NICAP compiled The UFO Evidence (1964), it included one section on “Air Force Observations” dating back to World War II that included 92 sightings, mostly by pilots and other flight crew members. Another section on “Army, Navy and Marine Corps” included 36 sightings.

— Richard H. Hall, The UFO Evidence Volume II

     Project 1947 has updated or enhanced over one hundred cases in this new version of the draft Navy, Marine and Coast Guard catalogue (NavCat 2.0). The new material consists of illustrations, additional details and links to reference material hosted on the Project 1947 site. Various map references have been added to help place the incidents. We have also added over one hundred new cases to the catalogue, doubling the previous version in size. This updated compilation represents about 80% of the cases gathered so far.

Half of the cases in the current NavCat occurred before January 1953. Since Project 1947 is mainly concerned with cases at the beginning of the UFO era, this is not surprising. Many cases only came to light due to the more accommodating official UFO information policies in 1952. After the close of Project Blue Book, the number of cases from seagoing services declined as there was no central collection point for such incidents. The breakdown of the origins of the cases are: Navy 77%, Marine Corps 12%, and 5% Coast Guard, with the remainder from other services. Again the statistics will change as new cases come to light.

As this is a draft document, a number of equivocal incidents have been presented. Some entries might be considered quite difficult to believe or to be almost in the category of rumors. We hope to gain more information on such entries before the catalogue is finalized. Cases with weak provenance will be culled from the final version.

Unknown or unidentified contacts

Some cases listed here are termed “unidentified contact” which may be radar, sonar, visual, or all three. A number of these are not UFO-like at all. Some are listed to illustrate the type of reports in official files, ship’s logs or other accounts. These too will be culled for the final document.

Submarine Reports

The Navy has an extensive world-wide submarine detection system. Few anomalous USO reports from this system are publicly known. The 1951-52 reports list come from Naval Intelligence Submarine Contacts which were supplied to Project Blue Book. Capt. Ruppelt wanted to see if it was possible to correlate unidentified submarine reports with UFO activity in the US. No correlation was found. Researcher Robert Todd was able to obtain a listing of the submarine contacts supplied to Ruppelt. Several unidentified or “doubtful submarines” are listed in the catalogue. Most contain few details and do not seem to be of an unusual nature.

When one thinks of UFO cases at missile test ranges, one immediately thinks of the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico. The Naval Air Weapons Station at China Lake also has some cases in the Project Blue Book files, some of which might appear to have only vague connections to UFOs. However, in the late 1960s Dr. James McDonald visited both Point Mugu and China Lake to speak to the facilities’ personnel. After his first talk at China Lake, he was granted extraordinary access to the base where he interviewed a number of personnel who reported various UFO incidents there from as early as the World War II era.

Unfortunately some of this interview material was lost during an airline flight when Dr McDonald's briefcase containing audio tape records and notes went missing. Fortunately some material from his investigations still existed in his papers at the University of Arizona. Dr McDonald also used his position as a contractor for the Office of Naval Research to cultivate sources to find other Navy cases. (Regrettably, he had no luck in his attempts to locate the records of the Navy’s UFO project ordered by Secretary of the Navy Dan Kimball in 1952.)

Keyhoe/NICAP “Hidden Cases”

A number of cases given to NICAP by various sources were confidential. They were often from serving military personnel or people in other high security capacities where their identities had to be protected from possible official repercussions. The authenticity of the cases were certified or sworn to by NICAP Board members or officials and they were referred to as “Hidden Cases.” Keyhoe’s Flying Saucers: Top Secret contained a list of such cases including a number of Navy, Marine and Coast Guard incidents. The location of the files on these cases is currently unknown, however, several of these cases have become public over the years: the North Atlantic case of Feb, 1951, the Korean case of 1951, and the so-called “Navy Squadron” case over the Atlantic, 1953. (In this last case some of the correspondence concerning attempts to get accounts from the witnesses still exist. Also, the case has been confirmed through the efforts of Dan Wilson.) The other files are considered lost, but may have existed in a private office Keyhoe supposedly had in his hometown.

Keyhoe, as a Naval Academy graduate and retired Marine officer, had numerous Navy contacts and sources. The National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP)’s bulletin “UFO Investigator” contained a lot of officially released information on space or aviation developments and the occasional UFO report. Even with these contacts, however, Keyhoe was apparently not tipped off about UFO-related articles in the semi-official “Naval Aviation News” magazine and the public release of information on the 1952 Greenland sighting.

Reporting by Navy/Marine/Coast Guard Witnesses and Officials

As has been pointed out before, some witnesses of UFO events self-censored and did not report them. Unless other witnesses made a report, there would be no official record of the incident. In a number of cases the witness(es) might report the case, sometimes in writing, only to be told, “If I report this, I will be laughed out of the Navy.” “I want to be promoted someday, so this will not be officially reported.” As a result, the official receiving the report ended up censoring the information and removing potentially good cases from the historical record.

UFO Reports are supposedly recorded in ship’s logs, but very few of these log entries have actually been found in the final or “smooth log”. Sometimes UFO reports are made in separate documents and not mentioned in the smooth log, even though witnesses claimed the entries were made at the time. Over and over again, in answer to FOIA requests, the Navy insisted that no records were kept, they were routinely destroyed, or they never existed in the first place. Despite this reticence to release information, some material has been located in official records. They were usually not listed as UFOs, but rather under unusual or unidentified radar contacts or displays.

During the Korean War, the 6004th Air Intelligence Service Squadron (AISS) and Air Technical Intelligence Liaison Office (ATILO) at the Far East Air Force (FEAF) did record several such unusual Navy contacts in their intelligence reports. [Air Technical Intelligence Liaisons or their representatives were present in Germany, Austria, Japan and Korea, the last especially during the Korean War. The German office made 12 UFO reports to ATIC in 1952 based on extensive investigations. The ATILO at FEAF made a number of official reports and comments based on their investigations. ATILO personnel in Korea had their own sightings.]

The Navy on occasion has been forthcoming with reports. The 1952 August Greenland report was made public in news headlines. The Pascagoula, Mississippi 1973 USO report was released to a number of sources. Other sightings were also later released to the press. After the closure of Project Blue Book, the Navy has responded to a number of FOIA requests with the release of records.

Most official Navy reports have come from either Project Blue Book or other agencies. One Navy source which regularly carried unusual aerial reports was the Hydrographic Office in its “Notice to Mariners” publication. Some were mentioned in various publications such as “Naval Aviation News” along with others.

The US Coast Guard is far more forthcoming. However, except for a small amount data in files titled “UFO” or similar subjects, the majority of the information is listed under witnesses’ names, locations or other such classifications. Locating a particular UFO report therefore is dependent on being able to nominate a specific name or location.

FOIA response from USCG to Robert Todd regarding handling UFO reports
- click on image(s) to enlarge -

While the Navy and other agencies many times respond to requests negatively, many documents have been found in general files such as “Naval Intelligence Reports, 1946.” A number of documents on Ghost Rockets (GR), formerly classified as “Top Secret” and below, were found just by turning over each page in the file. There was no separate file on the subject of “Ghost Rockets;” indeed no such file on GRs or Swedish Incidents or a dozen other names has yet to be found except those within the papers of General LeMay. [LeMay had a number of such reports in messages in his file which also included General McDonald, USAAF A-2 Report on GRs to the Commander of the Air Force Commander General Spaatz.] Other than LeMay’s papers, all other documents found to date were either by FOIA requests or by manually thumbing through documents at the National Archives and other record centers.

One instance of reports being made to officials that never reached the status of official records involves Major Dewey Fournet, USAF Intelligence HQ UFO monitor. Fournet made a presentation to Naval and Marine officers in a Naval Intelligence class in late 1952. He asked for and received three UFO accounts from class members. However, he did not send the reports to Project Blue Book, but rather they were recorded in a separate list of UFO reports and articles entitled “Operation Interloper.” The “Operation Interloper” documents Fournet brought from the Pentagon were captioned as “Unclassified.” One speculation is that “Operation Interloper” was used as a convenient way to learn of other UFO incidents by discussing the subject with individuals outside the government, or personnel who lacked the proper security clearance.

"NFIA": (No Further Information Available) has been added to catalog entries for which no other details or information is known to exist.

Project 1947 continues to gather reports from the Seagoing Services. We welcome any new reports, information, clarifications and corrections.

Saturday, August 01, 2009

" . . . People Don't Want UFO Information, They Want To Be Entertained By UFO Story Tellers"

Storyteller
Editor's Note: Jan's commentary was preciptated by Bob Salas' OpEd, entitled, The Idiocy of the Disclosure Movement—FW

By Jan Aldrich
www.project1947.com
7-31-1947

Jan Aldrich     In the beginning Salas was one of [Steven] Greer's witnesses. Hastings and others tried to get him to look at Greer 's record and his presentation, but Salas told Hastings that Greer was at least "doing something." Doing something by having speakers at the National Press Club telling reporters that there are 34 different alien races visiting earth.

Of course, at the time if anyone pointed out Greer's record or he and his bunch's silly statements, they were shouted down---oh and Dick Hall had to resign from MUFON for making critical remarks about speakers scheduled for the MUFON conference one of which was Greer. So much for free discussion in UFO land. After all, Greer was doing something! Yeah, he was doing something, he was leading the next assault of the UFO Disinformation Corps whose main policy is to make sure that UFOs appear absolutely silly to any educated and thinking person. Just do a Google search on any aspect of ufology, the return is one good hit to 100 UFO Disinformation Corps hits.

Greer got big investor to pony up big money for his "free energy" company. You get a small amount of investors to put up big buck and as long as the number is under, I think, 27 and the investors have certain asset levels, no SEC disclosure necessary. Lots of close hold companies do that. If they have half a chance than they may go to stock offering on a public exchange in which the original investors can get out with some profits or in the case of a hot offering a big killing. And most that reach this stage fail anyway.

Now if some cases in the close held stage never come out. Many of these are just "life style" companies...the officers of the company live high off the hog for awhile or maybe longer if they can get their investors to pony up again. Unless it is outright fraud, the courts look at these investors as "big boys" and should have known better.

Frankly, I feel it is my duty from time to time to go out and stand up to disinformation Corps. Usually I get shouted down After all everyone knows that the PC based on Roswell debris is alien, they have a gardener who works for the company and was a Navy Seal tellings us so. And then, how about the dentist who from visual inspection of Roswell debris make an alloy that the chemist at Stanford couldn't cut with a diamond saw or how about Mel Noel aka Guy Kirkwood his has a picture of himself in an Air Force flight suit, that means he was in the Air Force right! The Disinformation Corps does not care that he is an admitted hoaxer, they bring him back over and over again in a different venue sometimes with a new name. Or how about Anderson, another Navy Seal, not! Do we have element 115 yet? I need not go on.

There are always people in the UFO movement that will stand-up for the idiot of the day, then as the smoke clears and another UFO hoax is exposed, these same people will stand-up for the next one as if they have learned nothing. One reason I do not get UFO Updates any more. Most people don't want UFO information, they want to be entertained by UFO story tellers.