Showing posts with label Nuclear Weapons Sites. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nuclear Weapons Sites. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 02, 2019

History’s “Unidentified” Examines Nuclear Weapons-Related UFO Incidents



History’s “Unidentified” Examines Nuclear Weapons-Related UFO Incidents

     The fifth episode of Unidentified: Inside America’s UFO Investigation premiers Friday, June 28, 2019, on History (formerly the History Channel). Based on previews, the program will apparently examine a few of the now-well-documented cases of UFO activity at nuclear weapons sites.

In the months following The New York Times’ bombshell story, on December 16, 2017, about the existence of a classified Department of Defense UFO study, designated the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), three persons affiliated with the project have publicly alluded to its
By Robert Hastings
The UFO Chronicles
6-28-19
investigation of UFO interference with U.S. nuclear missiles: AATIP’s key Congressional sponsor, former U.S. Senator Harry Reid; AATIP physicist Dr. Hal Puthoff; and AATIP director Luis Elizondo. Reid’s comments, as well as those by Puthoff and Elizondo were made over the past 18 months during various interviews or lectures. Although brief and lacking in detail, due to their still-classified status, each comment confirms that UFOs have repeatedly knocked America’s ICBMs offline, thereby significantly impacting U.S. national security.

Persons familiar with my own work know that, over the past 46 years, I have interviewed more than 160 U.S. military veterans regarding their participation in or knowledge of similar nukes-related incidents, occurring between 1945 and 2015. On September 27, 2010, CNN live-streamed my UFOs and Nukes press conference in Washington D.C., during which seven of those veterans discussed their involvement in one case or another. The video of that media event as well as my follow-up interview on the network may be viewed in their entirety.

UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites
Although I was contacted last September by one of Unidentified’s producers, Jessica Philipps, and asked to participate in the fifth episode of the series, no interview ever took place, for reasons unknown. In any case, for those interested in UFO activity at nuclear weapons sites, my research is summarized in my documentary film, UFOs and Nukes: The Secret Link Revealed, and in my 600-page book, UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites.

Thursday, August 28, 2014

UFOs Reported Over Nuclear Weapons Test Site, Semipalatinsk-21 (Former Soviet Union) | VIDEO

Bookmark and Share

UFOs Reported Over Nuclear Weapons Test Site, Semipalatinsk-21 (Former Soviet Union)

By Timofey Yuriev
YouTube
5-31-14
We've tried to talk to the x-scientists and army personnel of our Nuclear Range... They confirmed that: "yes there was UFO activity in the area, and yes, there are documents exists... But each one of them, would refuse to tell us any details.

     When I was 5 years old, during one nice hot summer day I was playing outside with our anti-tank cannon...

Suddenly, a sparkling sphere in a diameter of 5 to 7 meters appeared. It was flying just above our 4 storey apartment building. It was changing colors from red to green to blue. It resembled a steel ball. It was moving silently. It didn't reflect anything...

In complete calmness, slowly it flew over the roofs of our army base, slowly went away to the horizon, until it disappeared.

My mother explained to me, that because of the nuclear tests happening about one time per month in our place, and as well as tests at the Space Station nearby, there are a lot of anomalies happen in our area, such as free flowing plasma, free floating lighting balls, and other unknown environmental phenomena. . . .

* Special Thanks To Robert Hastings

Thursday, February 25, 2010

UFO Activity at Nuclear Weapons Sites to be Revealed at the National Press Club: Your Assistance is Needed!

Robert Hastings at The National Press Club
By Robert Hastings & Robert Salas
www.ufohastings.com
2-24-10

UFOs and Nukes By Robert HastingsRobert Salas     UFO researcher Robert Hastings and former U.S. Air Force Captain Robert Salas are currently organizing a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. to address the vital issue of UFO incursions at U.S. nuclear weapons sites over the past six decades. The purpose of the event is to focus worldwide media attention on the reality and importance of the situation.

To date, more than 100 former or retired U.S. Air Force personnel—once trusted to operate or guard weapons of mass destruction—have come forward and revealed ongoing UFO surveillance of, and occasional interference with, our nuclear weapons. This information alters the historical perspective on the nuclear arms race and much, much more. The fact that the Pentagon and CIA have successfully kept the truth from public view for so long is in itself mind-boggling.

While most of the reported UFO incursions apparently involved simple observation, a few of them resulted in the shutdown of large numbers of nuclear missiles. This is more than a Cold War issue because these incidents continue to occur. Media reports of UFO activity at nuclear weapons sites have been published as recently as March 2009. Nuclear weapons proliferation is an ominous and crucial concern, affecting all of humanity. When combined with the secrecy surrounding UFO phenomenon, there exists a nexus of enormous importance.

At the press conference, tentatively scheduled for late September or early October 2010, a dozen ex-USAF personnel, including Mr. Salas, will discuss their nukes-related UFO experiences. By way of introduction, Mr. Hastings will briefly summarize his 37 years of research on the UFO-Nukes Connection. Following the statements of the witnesses, Mr. Salas will offer concluding remarks. The assembled members of the media will then have an opportunity to ask questions for an extended period.

To finance this event, Mr. Hastings and Mr. Salas are soliciting funds to cover the participants’ travel expenses, hotel accommodations and meals, as well as costs associated with the preparation of press kits. It is estimated that $15,000 will be required to fund the occasion.

This will be a non-profit event. A dedicated bank account has been set up to handle donations by organizations and individuals willing to support this important presentation. Following the press conference, any remaining funds will be donated to a charitable institution and the account closed. Information regarding balances, expenditure of funds, and other details may be obtained by writing to Mr. Salas at Rasalas@roadrunner.com.

This endeavor to present the facts about the UFO-Nukes Connection to the media, and people everywhere, is both historic and necessary. Our goal is to make the promise of open government on this issue a reality. With your help, a group of dedicated witnesses are prepared to spearhead the effort. Donations may be made at www.ufohastings.com
by clicking on the Press Conference page. Any contribution, large or small, will be appreciated. Thank you for your support.

Monday, November 16, 2009

Former U.S. Military Personnel to Discuss UFO Incursions at Nuclear Weapons Sites at the National Press Club

Robert Hastings at The National Press Club
By Robert Hastings
www.ufohastings.com
11-15-09

     Former U.S. Air Force Captain Robert Salas and UFO-Nukes Connection researcher Robert Hastings are currently organizing a press conference to be held at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. in the fall of 2010. At least a dozen former or retired U.S. military personnel who witnessed one or more UFO incursions at U.S. nuclear weapons sites will participate and discuss their experiences.

This formal announcement of the upcoming press conference has been posted a year in advance in the hope that other former/retired U.S. military personnel who have experienced UFO activity at nuclear weapons sites will come forward and support this disclosure effort, either by participating directly or by submitting a written statement relating to their encounter(s) for presentation during the event.

Salas and Hastings hope to draw worldwide media attention to the reality of UFO-initiated nuclear missile malfunctions and activations, which occurred at several U.S. Air Force bases during the Cold War era, as reported by various missile launch officers, targeting and maintenance personnel, security police, and others with knowledge of these incidents.

The situation is ongoing: Recent reports from active duty USAF personnel, as well as from civilians residing in the vicinity of nuclear missile sites, strongly suggest that UFO incursions at these facilities continue to occur. Similar reports have been received from persons living near installations at which the U.S. Navy’s nuclear missile-carrying submarines are based.

Robert Salas is the co-author (with Jim Klotz) of Faded Giant which details Salas’ involvement in a UFO-initiated mass missile shutdown at Malmstrom AFB, Montana, in March 1967. Robert Hastings is the author of UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites which summarizes his 36-year investigation of such cases. Those who wish to provide information to Salas and/or Hastings may contact them at rsalas15@roadrunner.com or hastings444@att.net .

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Military UFO Sightings During the Cuban Missile Crisis

U-2 Over Flight Photo Cubam Missile Crisis
By Robert L. Hastings
www.ufohastings.com
© 10-9-09

Robert Hastings Persons familiar with my three decades of research on the UFO-Nukes Connection know that declassified U.S. Air Force, FBI and CIA documents, as well as eyewitness testimony from ex-U.S. military personnel, confirm an intermittent but ongoing UFO presence at America’s nuclear weapons sites. Indeed, some of the former/retired Minuteman missile launch and targeting officers I have interviewed unequivocally state that, on a few occasions, those piloting the unidentified craft actually knocked our Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) off-line, at least temporarily. See: www.nicap.org

However, despite this persistent pattern of UFO activity at nuclear missile sites and B-52 strategic bomber bases during the Cold War era, there exists a puzzling near-absence of UFO reports during the single most terrifying episode of the decades-long stand-off between the U.S. and the former Soviet Union: The Cuban Missile Crisis.

The world as we know it almost ceased to exist in October 1962. Those Americans old enough to remember the missile crisis will undoubtedly recall the grave concern and sometimes naked fear that gripped the country during those fateful few days.

Soviet citizens may have been somewhat less concerned because their state-controlled media routinely lied to them about, well, everything, and it’s doubtful that the average Russian fully appreciated how dire the situation was as the crisis unfolded. Regardless, their leaders in the Kremlin knew the score, and were justifiably alarmed that their gamble to secretly place medium-range nuclear missiles in Cuba was about to blow up in their, and everyone else’s faces.

Of course, people all around the globe were deeply apprehensive too, however, their own governments were essentially powerless to do anything about the crisis, so they looked on helplessly as the superpowers hunkered down and prepared for the first global thermonuclear war in human history.

So, what were those who pilot the UFOs doing during the missile crisis? According to published sighting report data bases, they were decidedly conspicuous by their absence. Based on declassified U.S. government documents and the ufological literature, it appears that UFO activity during those ominous days of October 1962 was at a rather low level worldwide. This fact had always struck me as odd. Given other clusters of UFO activity at nuclear weapons laboratories and storage areas, or during periods of intense atomic testing in Nevada and the Pacific (and, later on, at U.S. Air Force ICBM sites outside various Strategic Air Command bases) one might predict that a UFO presence would be in evidence, in one form or another, during the planet’s closest brush with nuclear catastrophe.

And yet, as far as I was aware, no credible information had ever surfaced to suggest that UFOs had been observed at Homestead AFB, Florida, or other military staging bases, or near any of Malmstrom AFB, Montana’s ICBMs—which President Kennedy later called his “ace in the hole” during the crisis—or near the U.S. Naval blockade of Cuba, or at any other location where preparations for nuclear war were occurring at an intense pace.

(I was, however, aware of an alleged UFO intercept attempt by U.S. Air Force jet fighters on an unspecified date during the missile crisis, as reported by researcher Francis Ridge. However, to my knowledge, this incident was unique. Ridge’s report may be found at: http://www.nicap.org

And so, for years, I had wondered why military-related UFO sighting reports were essentially non-existent during those momentous days. The first hint I had of possible UFO activity during the missile crisis only arrived, quite unexpectedly, in 2006, when I was provided with an intriguing report first sent to the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS). The source, a retired U.S. Air Force sergeant—who I will call “John Smith”—had been a jet engine mechanic with the 42nd Field Maintenance Squadron (FMS) at Loring AFB, Maine.

In his letter to CUFOS, Smith offered an utterly amazing, almost unbelievable account of a dramatic UFO incursion on some date in, he thought, 1961. After I read his written report, I called Smith, spoke with him at length, and concluded that he was a reliable witness—despite the fact that one element in his story pressed the limits of credibility. (Indeed, many people would undoubtedly say it goes well beyond those limits.)

In any case, when I began researching the particulars of Smith’s report, including the type of position he held in the Air Force at the time of the incident, it soon became clear that the UFO sighting had actually occurred in the fall of 1962. More to the point, based on other information I later received—relating to a unique, temporary departure from the type of B-52 missions then being flown at Loring—the UFO sighting reported by Smith had to have occurred during the period of the Cuban Missile Crisis or immediately thereafter! Once this startling fact had been established, I tackled the case with zeal—and immediately ran into several frustrating roadblocks.

Smith had mentioned in his original letter that a two-aircraft or “tandem” mission, code-named Chrome Dome, had been on final approach for landing just as the UFO appeared over the base’s flight line. When the 42nd Bomb Wing at Loring had the responsibility for launching Chrome Dome missions (it rotated among SAC bomber bases) two sorties per day were flown, each involving a single B-52 flying one of two courses, known as the Northern and Southern Routes. However, during the heightened-alert period of the missile crisis—and apparently at no other time—two aircraft flew each course. This temporary operational change is confirmed in the 42nd Bomb Wing’s unit history. Moreover, a retired colonel who flew such missions at Loring during that era later told me that the tandem Chrome Dome missions had been discontinued in, as he recalled, early November 1962, once the crisis had passed.

Consequently, if a two-aircraft Chrome Dome mission was in fact returning to base at the time of the alleged UFO sighting, as Smith contends, the incident he describes had to have occurred on some date during, or a few days after, the two-week-long Cuban Missile Crisis.

I also later located and interviewed Smith’s former jet mechanic partner at Loring (he must remain anonymous as well) who nervously confirmed the return of the “two Chrome Domes.” However, he claimed not to remember the alleged UFO sighting reported by Smith. Nevertheless, this individual did confirm Smith’s recollection of an unspecified emergency situation, which had prompted a large number of 42nd FMS personnel being ordered to the flight line in anticipation of a possible crash landing by one or both returning aircraft. He told me he had assumed there had been a mid-air collision or some other mishap involving both aircraft. He also confirmed Smith’s statement that a large number of high-ranking officers had also quickly assembled on the tarmac as well, adding, “I didn’t know we had that many colonels on base!” According to both Smith and his former team partner, despite the emergency response, there was no obvious damage to either of the bombers and they both landed safely.

However, when I began pressing Smith’s former co-worker for additional details about the incident, he suddenly said he had fallen asleep in the back of one of the maintenance trucks parked on the flight line and could not confirm what actually happened as the aircraft (and the UFO?) arrived. This seemed curious to me, given that the assembled FMS personnel would had to have performed specific mechanical tasks if either aircraft was in fact damaged and, therefore, they all would have been alert—that is, awake—when the B-52s landed. When I pointed this out to Smith’s team partner, he became evasive and attempted to end the conversation. Consequently, I remain highly dubious about his assertion that he had been asleep at the time the aircraft landed. Indeed, Smith recalls him looking skyward in amazement, along with everyone else, as the UFO came into view.

(This individual later told Smith that, after leaving his job as a jet engine mechanic, he had become a B-52 tail gunner. He admitted that, early in his new assignment, his aircraft commander had told him never to report a UFO, even if he should see one. He was essentially informed that such reports were taboo and never to be discussed with anyone.)

Now, as I mentioned earlier, Smith’s account contains a extremely unusual element which, although not unprecedented—it has also been reported in a number of other UFO sighting cases—may simply make this incident too far-out for most people to accept. Smith reports that following the appearance of the unidentified craft above the flight line, which left at a high rate of speed, he and the other witnesses standing nearby him all went about their business as if nothing had happened. Although Smith and the others had reportedly been staring skyward at the spectacle in obvious wonder, once the UFO departed there was absolutely no discussion of its presence among the witnesses—something that baffles Smith to this day.

He told me, “Even though it had been hovering there for a couple of minutes, maybe five minutes, I did not bring the UFO up with any of the other men. I knew exactly what had happened but had no desire to talk about it. I do not know how to explain that very well, as it is not what I consider to be rational human behavior or thinking. But I never forgot what happened that day. I just never gave it very much serious thought and, for many years, never wondered why no one had ever discussed the incident, either that day or the following days. But the memory of it was always with me and sometimes when alone I’d think about it all, but I never discussed it with anyone until the year 1976, when I told my wife the entire story.”

Moreover, Smith said there had been also been no discussion in his group about the announced emergency involving the two B-52s, which resulted in nearly all of the maintenance squadron personnel who were on duty being ordered to the flight line. It was as if that event never happened either, despite its apparently unique status among the Chrome Dome missions launched at Loring and potentially disastrous outcome. He said, “Even if there had been no UFO, it [should have been] big-time talk-time!” But not a word, then or later, was said—either about the UFO or the reported aircraft emergency—which Smith understandably finds to be unbelievably bizarre. He added, “But at the time, it didn’t even occur to me that it was [strange]. It was like a dream or as if it never happened, but it did.”

While one might be tempted to point to this highly improbable aspect of Smith’s account as evidence that the sighting was merely an imaginative fantasy having no basis in reality, other factors which I will not mention at the moment tend to suggest otherwise.

Now, I don’t mean to be a tease but, for now, this is about as far as I will go in describing Smith’s intriguing report. If his account has merit—and in my view it does—then it obviously must be investigated far more rigorously before any comprehensive synopsis of it can be published, especially in view of its tentative link with the Cuban Missile Crisis. I have only mentioned it at all in the hope that others will come forward and corroborate its factuality.

According to Smith, a great many Air Force personnel at the base witnessed the weird event. If that was indeed the case, I do not wish to risk influencing their memories of this sighting—assuming that it occurred, and assuming that others retain some memory of it—given its potential importance.

I also want to avoid being contacted by bogus “witnesses” whose intention is to write themselves into this story, for whatever nefarious reason they might have. If I were to present the full account, as reported to me by Smith, it would be much easier for such false leads to materialize. Therefore, I will just leave this intriguing report for now—intentionally omitting most of the details I currently possess—in the event that one or more persons reading this, who happened to be on the Loring AFB flight line that day, eventually decide to contact me.

"In summary, I am hoping to hear from former or retired U.S. military personnel who were stationed at any base during the Cuban Missile Crisis—especially those permanently or temporarily hosting squadrons armed with nuclear weapons." I am seeking reports of UFO activity, or lack thereof, during that unique period of time. Such information will be kept strictly confidential, unless I am granted permission to publish it. My current email address is below. Should that change in the future, my new address can be found at my website, www.ufohastings.com. Leads may also be sent to Frank Warren at the UFO Chronicles website, who will then forward them to me.

Friday, September 25, 2009

Noted UFO Researcher Robert Hastings to Appear on Coast to Coast AM to Discuss Important Revelations About The Roswell Incident

Robert Hastings

     UFO-Nukes Connection researcher Robert Hastings will make his third appearance on Coast to Coast AM on Wednesday, September 30, 2009. (The program begins at 10 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time but Hastings’ one-hour segment begins at 1 a.m. Thursday morning PDT.) Visit http://www.coasttocoastam.com/ for details.

The topic for discussion will be former U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Supervisor Chet Lytle’s revelations about the Roswell Incident. Lytle, who did engineering work for the Manhattan Project, which created the first atomic bomb during World War II, states that the former Roswell Army Airfield commander, then-Colonel William Blanchard, personally told him that the crashed object secretly recovered near the base, in July 1947, was an alien spacecraft.

A detailed discussion of Lytle’s admission appears in Hastings’ critically-acclaimed book UFO and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites. A brief summary may also be found HERE.

The dramatic revelation occurred during a taped interview with Hastings, concerning Lytle’s knowledge of nuclear weapons-related UFO activity. Unexpectedly, the retired engineer began discussing Roswell. In February 1953, Lytle—by then a weapons stockpiling supervisor with the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)—was visiting Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, together with newly-promoted USAF Brigadier General Blanchard, whose assignment was the training of aircrews for the B-36 strategic bombers based there.

According to Lytle, who held Top Secret clearances related to nuclear weapons work, during a flight from Alaska to Illinois, his “very good friend” Blanchard confessed to him that an extraterrestrial spacecraft had been recovered in 1947, together with four dead aliens. Lytle, whose AEC office at Wright-Patterson AFB, in the early 1950s, put him in the right place at the right time to learn more, said that he had also been privy to “leaks about autopsies on the bodies from people who had been in and seen them.” Lytle further stated that the crashed craft had been stored at Hanger 5 on the base, adding, “I had the highest clearances involving atomic weapons stockpiling. I was very heavily cleared to do what I did, but I was never allowed into that area.”

Hastings says, “Three years after my 1998 interview with Lytle, he refused to answer a few follow-up questions, nervously telling me that after our first conversation he had been ‘paid a visit’ by someone who wanted to know why he was talking to me and Roswell researcher Don Schmitt.”

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

Scientists and UFOs

UFOs and Nukes By Robert Hastings
Scientists and UFOs

Excerpt From the book UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites


By Robert Hastings
© 2008

Part 1

Robert Hastings “From time to time in the history of science, situations have arisen in which a problem of ultimately enormous importance went begging for adequate attention simply because that problem appeared to involve phenomena so far outside the current bounds of scientific knowledge that it was not even regarded as a legitimate subject of serious scientific concern. That is precisely the situation in which the UFO problem now lies. One of the principal results of my own recent intensive study of the UFO enigma is this: I have become convinced that the scientific community, not only in this country but throughout the world, has been casually ignoring as nonsense a matter of extraordinary scientific importance.”¹

—Dr. James E. McDonald
Senior Physicist, Institute of Atmospheric Physics
Professor of Meteorology, University of Arizona

Scientists universally profess allegiance to the lofty principles comprising the Scientific Method, both in the pursuit of their own research, as well as when reviewing the work of their peers. Therefore, one might predict that they will indignantly dismiss the suggestion that, on occasion, they have temporarily abandoned those cherished principles. Nevertheless, as regards the subject of UFOs, very few scientists actually practice what they preach.

In essence, to engage in science is to search for knowledge. This exploration is conducted through the systematic collection and objective analysis of facts. If one aspires to understand the nature of an unexplained phenomenon, one must first assemble and evaluate data—or, at least, impartially examine the data gathered by others—before drawing conclusions.

Unfortunately, most scientists reject outright the validity of UFO research, refuse to engage in it, and deliberately ignore the intriguing data compiled by a handful of their more inquisitive, less-biased peers. If this were not enough, despite their profound unfamiliarity with the subject, many of these same intransigent individuals pontificate about UFOs in the most shameless and presumptuous manner. If they were to apply this same “methodology” to their own research, their colleagues might justifiably consider their conduct incompetent, if not fraudulent. Nevertheless, it is rare to hear a scientist speak or write knowledgeably about the UFO phenomenon, and rarer still to find one who has actually studied it.

Accuse a scientist of being closed-minded about UFOs and he or she will recoil: “I’m not closed-minded, but I am skeptical!” Because the former term implies inflexible prejudice and the latter one prudent caution, it is understandable that these UFO “skeptics” would prefer to view themselves in a more flattering light.

One scientist who has advocated a comprehensive, unbiased investigation the UFO phenomenon, astronomer Dr. Bernard Haisch, defines a Skeptic as, “One who practices the method of suspended judgment, engages in rational and dispassionate reasoning as exemplified by the scientific method, shows willingness to consider alternative explanations without prejudice based on prior beliefs, and who seeks out evidence and carefully scrutinizes its validity.”²

By Haisch’s definition, very few scientists are true skeptics on the subject of UFOs. On the contrary, over the years, most have behaved as self-appointed experts, having all the answers, without first investigating any of the facts. Although scientists profess a deep curiosity about little understood or unknown phenomena, when it comes to UFOs, this assertion rings hollow. At the moment, the UFO phenomenon is a blind spot in most scientists’ field of vision. There is definitely something there to be seen, but they cannot, or will not, bring themselves to take a look.

As noted at the beginning of the chapter, the late Dr. James McDonald—one of the few scientists to have actually studied the UFO phenomenon before holding forth on the subject—once pointedly criticized the thoroughly unprofessional posture toward UFOs he observed among his colleagues and the scientific community at large.

Sad to say, some 40 years after Dr. McDonald’s lament, the same smug, dismissive attitude toward the phenomenon remains firmly entrenched in scientific circles, resulting in a pervasive, self-imposed ignorance about UFOs among those who supposedly seek the truth. At the beginning of the 21st century, it remains true that the overwhelming majority of scientists, if they consider UFOs at all, consider them to be beneath their dignity, and worthy of outright derision. With this self-righteous stance, they have effectively abdicated their collective professional responsibility in the most unscientific manner. This is not so much an accusation as it is an objective statement of fact.

Fortunately, despite the collective disinterest in UFOs exhibited by the scientific community as a whole, there have been a few brave pioneers. In the mid-1960s, Jim McDonald was well ahead of the curve, with his repeated, plaintive calls for a legitimate investigation of the UFO phenomenon. Seeking to review the available data for himself, he persistently demanded an opportunity to review the Air Force’s UFO files—at least those held by Project Blue Book—and was ultimately granted repeated access to the ones that were not classified.

As noted earlier, following those reviews, McDonald wrote, “…There are hundreds of good cases in the Air Force files that should have led to top-level scientific scrutiny of [UFOs] years ago, yet these cases have been swept under the rug in a most disturbing way by Project Blue Book investigators and their consultants.”³

Despite, or perhaps because of, the Air Force’s ongoing attempts to suppress the frequently high-quality data on UFOs it collected, McDonald began to investigate the phenomenon on his own time and at his own expense, while ignoring the very real risk to his scientific reputation. This diligence paid off and, by 1968, McDonald was widely regarded—although not among his still-dubious peers—as one of the world’s leading scientific experts on UFOs. Consequently, he was invited to address congress on the subject, during hearings held that year. McDonald’s full statement before the House Committee on Science and Astronautics, presented on July 29th, may be found in the U.S. Congressional Record, as well as on the Internet.

While acknowledging that the overwhelming majority of UFO sightings undoubtedly had prosaic explanations, and that a great many questions about the phenomenon remained unanswered, McDonald succinctly summarized his conclusions regarding the most credible of the unexplained cases: “My own present opinion, based on two years of careful study, is that UFOs are probably extraterrestrial devices engaged in something that might very tentatively be termed ‘surveillance’.”4

Although this was merely an opinion, it was after all an informed opinion on UFOs, something very few other scientists could offer, then or now. Many of McDonald’s published papers, private research notes, and personal letters relating to his investigations of the UFO phenomenon are now accessible online, providing insight into the cautious, rational reasoning underlying his dramatic conclusions.

There is an old joke about the intellectual who sniffs, “Well, it may work in fact, but it will never work in theory.” While most UFO skeptics are quick to dismiss as impossible the idea that UFOs are alien spacecraft, very few of them will ever make the effort to learn whether any evidence exists to suggest otherwise. Instead, they merely continue to assert that, as an idea, it simply does not work. However, as the joke implies, the real question to be asked is whether it works in fact. That is, is there evidence in the real world, which lends credence to the validity of the ET hypothesis of UFOs.

Granted, the proposal that UFOs are alien spaceships is decidedly “counter-intuitive”. For most scientific professionals, the notion just doesn’t make sense and almost certainly has no basis in reality. However, as is often the case in science, many ideas, which initially seem impossible, or at least highly unlikely, eventually turn out to be true. As a noted cosmologist once observed, “The greatest obstacle to the advancement of science is the illusion of knowledge—the notion that one already knows the answers.”

Precisely. At the end of the day, practicing science still involves asking questions and seeking answers, whatever those answers turn out to be. However, a scientist must actually adhere to, not just reflexively espouse, these fundamental principles. Pontificating about UFOs from the comfort of the armchair contributes nothing to the solution to the problem. To honestly attempt an understanding of UFOs, one must actually investigate the UFO phenomenon, however pointless or distasteful this proposal might seem to some. As that street-smart sage, New York Yankees catcher Yogi Berra, once observed, “You can see a lot just by looking.”

* Part 2 to appear on this website soon

References:

1. McDonald, Dr. James E. “Prepared Statement before the House Committee on Science and Astronautics”, July 29, 1968
2. UFOskeptic.org
3. [Tucson] Daily Citizen, March 1, 1967
4. McDonald, Dr. James E. “Prepared Statement before the House Committee on Science and Astronautics”, July 29, 1968