Tuesday, April 29, 2025

New Video of Tic-Tac UFOs and Witness Emerges

New Video of Tic-Tac UFOs and Witness Emerges - www.theufochronicles.com

"... senior chief and radar specialist, Alexandro Wiggins and others, while on duty in the ship’s Combat Information Center (CIC) observed “unknown objects” on their screens that appeared to emerge from the ocean."


     A U.S. Navy veteran detailed a recent encounter with unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) off the Southern California coast. In February 2023, while serving aboard the USS Jackson as a senior chief and radar specialist, Alexandro Wiggins and others,
By The UFO Chronicles
4-18-25
while on duty in the ship’s Combat Information Center (CIC) observed “unknown objects” on their screens that appeared to emerge from the ocean.

Wanting to see the objects with his own eyes, he went on deck and verified what he observed on his radar screen. In an interview with filmmaker, Jeremy Corbell, he stated, “To my surprise, which is something I’ve never witnessed, was a light I noticed on the horizon, it looked as if it were surfacing out of the water and going up.” He quickly returned to the CIC and took a closer look using the SAFIRE System (a thermal sensor) and discovered that the thermal imaging system had picked up not one, but several tic tac–shaped objects.

As Wiggins later described, an initial object was soon joined by a second, and when his team zoomed out for a broader view, they discovered a total of four objects in close proximity. These craft then made a rapid, simultaneous departure towards the northeast, moving with a speed that defied conventional explanation.

The incident, which strongly echoes the infamous Tic Tac encounter from 2004, has reignited public and official interest in UAP sightings, particularly as new Congressional hearings urge witnesses to come forward.

Wiggins, who is also connected to Las Vegas by way of his personal past shared his account after seeing circulating footage.

The video of the sighting was later discussed on a podcast hosted by documentary filmmaker Jeremy Corbell (see below) adding another layer to what many see as an unfolding mystery involving potentially advanced aerial technology or phenomena that challenge current scientific understanding.

Friday, April 18, 2025

'Strongest Evidence Yet' of life Discovered On a Distant Planet

'Strongest Evidence Yet' of life Discovered on Distant Planet - www.theufochronicles.com

"Astronomers announced Thursday that they had detected the most promising 'hints' of potential life on a planet beyond our solar system, though other scientists expressed skepticism."


     There has been vigorous debate in scientific circles about whether the planet K2-18b, which is 124 light years away in the Leo constellation, could be an ocean world capable of hosting microbial life, at least.
By CBS News
4-17-2025

Using the James Webb Space Telescope, a British-U.S. team of researchers detected signs of two chemicals in the planet's atmosphere long considered to be "biosignatures" indicating extraterrestrial life.

Thursday, April 17, 2025

UFO Search Ends in Tragic Death

UFO Search Ends in Tragic Death - www.theufochronicles.com

"A 48-year-old woman ... died waiting for UFOs in the frozen wilderness ..."


     A 48-year-old woman who died waiting for UFOs in the frozen wilderness was a widow who had quit her job as a registered nurse last May, acquaintances say.

By The Bismarck Tribune
11-20-1982
Laverne Landis, mother of five grown children, was found dead Monday in a compact car, where she had spent a month camped with Gerald Flach, ,a 38-year-old electrician. He was found semiconscious on a snow-packed trail.

Flach and Landis had met a group of people interested in UFOs at the Psychic Fair in California las January, friends said. Flach told authorities had been received messages through Landis "from some high power."

In October, Flach said, the two were directed to go to the end of the Gunflint Trail and await further messages.

So they traveled to the remote wilderness area in northeastern Minnesota.

After a week they ran out of food and lived on vitamins and lake water. The car ran out of gasoline after two weeks, so they couldn't use the heater. They wrapped their feet and hands in strips of a torn blanket as they continued their vigil.

The watch ended Monday, when rescuers found the body of Landis. She had died of exposure, dehydration and starvation.

When found Landis was wearing open sandals, a sweater, slacks and a coat, with her feet and hands wrapped in strips of blanket, said Bruce Kerfoot of the Gunflint Trail Rescue Squad.

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

1967 Malmstrom AFB UFO Incident Botched by David Duchovny

1967 Malmstrom AFB UFO Incident Botched by David Duchovny  - www.theufochronicles.com



     I recently watched the first episode of Declassified Secrets with David Duchovny, now airing on the History Channel on Friday nights. As the name indicates, it’s the former The X Files star’s latest series. One segment dealt with the once-hidden but now-famous UFO-related ICBM-shutdown incident at Malmstrom AFB, Montana in 1967, first exposed in 1996 by one of the Minuteman missile launch officers who was on duty when it occurred, former USAF Captain Robert Salas.

Given Hollywood’s checkered track record on accurately reporting UFO encounters at the US Air Force’s ICBM sites, in a variety of programs on several different television networks over the years, I
Robert Hastings - www.theufochronicles.com
By Robert Hastings
The UFO Chronicles
4-11-25
was not optimistic that the Duchovny show would get all of the facts straight. But I certainly never expected that its treatment of Salas’ incident would be so thoroughly error-filled and basically incompetent.

In my book, UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites, I discuss the intriguing event at length. Actually, there were at least two UFO-related mass-missile shutdowns at Malmstrom, on March 16th and 24th 1967, and I was responsible for getting a number of former USAF personnel with knowledge of the highly-dramatic, still-classified incidents to go on the record for the first time.

The book’s entire chapter regarding those events is available here.

While some readers may conclude that I am overreacting to the Duchovny show’s treatment of the ten missile-shutdown on March 24th, and that my criticisms mostly concern trivialities, I will disagree. The importance of the reality of UFOs repeatedly interfering with our nuclear missiles at several Air Force bases over the years—as confirmed by scores of USAF veterans who I’ve interviewed—is self-evident. Any public discussion of the situation should strive to be accurately presented.

So, whenever I read or watch an attempted review of those developments that is deeply flawed—due to skeptical ignorance, inept research efforts, or disinformational spin—I just have to respond.

Tellingly, despite the series title, Declassified Secrets with David Duchovny, the Oscar Flight incident remains classified to this day! Given that the show’s producers missed that fact, I guess I shouldn’t have been too surprised at the very faulty summary of it that they foisted on all of us. While I counted more than a dozen factual misstatements in the carelessly constructed six-minute segment, I’ll only address three here:

First, it claims, “Salas [was] in his command headquarters and suddenly he [got] a call from the gate personnel at the entrance to Malmstrom, about some sort of strange light that is flying, moving in a strange pattern over the base itself.” In reality, Salas—and his missile commander Captain Frederick Meiwald, who was with him but is never even mentioned in the program segment—were some 125 road-miles east of Malmstrom in their underground Launch Control Center at Oscar Flight, a group of ten Minuteman-I missiles located near Roy, Montana.

Only later in the segment is there an acknowledgement of Salas’ presence in a Launch Control Capsule far from the base, thereby contradicting earlier statements that the incident occurred on Malmstrom itself.

Following this confusion, the segment then says that the head Security Policeman on-site, who had notified Salas about the mysterious aerial light, then called a second time and, screaming into the phone, said that a glowing, orange-colored “orb” was now silently hovering directly over the gate of the fence surrounding the above-ground Oscar Launch Control Facility building. Actually, as Salas has repeatedly stated in various interviews, the hovering object was reported by the Security Policemen confronting it to be disc-shaped and at least 40-feet in diameter—it was not a small, spherical orb.

More importantly, the segment claims that following the incident the Air Force sent “a team from an ongoing secret investigation, known as Project Blue Book, [to investigate it.]” In reality, although Salas and Meiwald were forcefully interrogated about the incident and told to sign national security non-disclosure statements, Blue Book never investigated the alarming incursion and, significantly, the Air Force continues to officially deny that there has ever been UFO interference with any of our nuclear missiles’ functionality, at any base, over the past seven decades!

Nevertheless, despite the false claim of Blue Book’s involvement in the Oscar Flight case, the segment stubbornly doubles-down and has journalist and wannabe-UFO expert Garrett Graff saying on camera, “Investigators from Project Blue Book look into this incident at Malstrom [sic], and they don’t think that it’s an alien spacecraft but they also can’t find any other logical explanation.” This is simply untrue. No such Blue Book report ever existed.

Later in the segment, Graff opines, “I think the US government knows more about some of these UFO sightings than it lets on, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that they’re alien spacecraft. A mystery is in some ways just as challenging as an actual secret. Still today, the government is just as likely to classify its ignorance as it is its knowledge.”

While this last sentiment—regarding government ignorance often being unacknowledged—is undoubtedly true, the exhaustive research conducted by myself and other researchers conclusively establishes that the Air Force knows tremendously more about UFOs—and the nuclear weapons-related cases in particular—than Graff’s vague, arguably apologist statement suggests. His empty platitude completely ignores the wealth of specific, detailed, formerly-classified material about UAP now in the public domain. It appears that he is either uninformed or too negatively biased to understand its importance.

Indeed, in various skeptical public statements he has made, Graff has doubted the existence of Non-Human Intelligence on Earth, saying, “UFOs could be weird physics [we don’t yet understand] rather than aliens from Alpha Centauri buzzing the USS Nimitz.” He has also endorsed the long-ago discredited CIA claim that “half” of all UFO sightings in the US during the 1950s were due to flights of the still-secret U-2 spy plane.

After noting several of those off-base and generally dismissive claims by Graff during several interviews, I decided that I wouldn’t waste my time reading his 500-page book, UFO: The inside Story of the US Government’s Search for Alien Life Here—and Out There.

However, one person who did read the book reviewed it at Amazon, saying,

... There is no “inside story” to be found anywhere in the book. Instead, we find many of the familiar stories that include Roswell, Foo Fighters, projects Sign, Grudge, Blue Book, Capt. Mantel, the fraud George Adamski and his blond friend “Orthon” from Venus, the Robertson Panel, the Socorro Incident, swamp gas, ball lightning, the Condon Report, Tehran F-4s, MJ-12, crop circles, cattle mutilations, Phoenix Lights, Skinwalker Ranch, Tic Tac UFO, etc., etc., etc.
[...]

... And yet, many more relevant or intriguing UFO tales are completely missing. Where are Dr. Robert Sarbacher, Admiral Wilson’s near-sacking, Wilbert Smith’s famous quote, Gulf Breeze, Bentwaters, the Trent photos, the Zimbabwe school children, UFO and nuclear ICBM interactions, Illinois police triangles, and many more? Not there!

So, in his 518-page book claiming to be “the inside story” of the US government’s response to UFOs, Garrett Graff apparently fails to even mention UFO activity at nuclear missile sites, let alone discuss it at length—and yet this was the guy chosen by Duchovny’s producers to hold forth on the tremendously important incident at Malmstrom’s Oscar Flight in March 1967.

As for Duchovny himself, despite his UFO-sleuth role on The X Files, the actor is a well-known skeptic on The Phenomenon. Indeed, during the 1990s, when the show was a runaway hit, Duchovny gave several interviews in which he disappointed fans by pooh-poohing UFOs and the notion of a government cover-up of them. “It’s just a show!” he repeatedly exclaimed. I have tried to find examples of those interviews—which I clearly remember—to link to here, but have so far been unsuccessful. (And, candidly, I’m not going to waste any more time trying to locate them online.)

In any case, the producers of Duchovny’s new show need to do much better research for their UAP-related segments in the future, and begin utilizing better informed, less biased talking-heads.

Monday, March 31, 2025

The U.S. Intelligence Community Monitors UFO Researchers’ Activities: (Redux)


Implemented by the CIA in 1953, the Practice Continues Today


"By the early-1980s, the involvement of the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA in the collection of UFO-related data had been firmly established."

(Originally published on Wednesday, July 31, 2013)


     In 1973, when I began interviewing former/retired U.S. military personnel regarding their UFO experiences at nuclear weapons facilities, I didn’t give much thought to the possibility that the intelligence community would take an interest in my activities [ad].

At that point, the CIA’s “Robertson Panel” Report—which recommended surveillance of American UFO-research advocacy groups—was still classified. Indeed, as far as the public knew, the only component of the U.S. government responsible for UFO-related matters was the Air Force.
Robert Hastings - www.theufochronicles.com
By Robert Hastings
The UFO Chronicles
3-30-25

However, that myth slowly faded away as classified documents began to be pried loose for public inspection via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). By the early-1980s, the involvement of the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA in the collection of UFO-related data had been firmly established.

My own naiveté regarding what I considered to be the remote possibility of covert surveillance of my own activities was shattered in early 1982, shortly after I first went out on the American college lecture circuit to report my findings. Those public programs resulted in media coverage by numerous newspapers, including the New York Times, as well as the Associated Press and United Press International.

Apparently, FBI also took notice.

In 2012, veteran UFO researcher and Freedom of Information requestor Larry W. Bryant sent me a letter he had received from the FBI—in response to an FOIA request on my behalf—in which the bureau acknowledged that their records indicated the existence of files on my UFO-related activities. However, according the letter, a search for those files was unsuccessful because they were supposedly “missing”. Neither Bryant nor I believe that to be the case.

The first indication I had that someone was monitoring my research activities came within months of my first national publicity. It was/is my practice to tape record my interviews with the military veterans—who have described observing UFOs maneuvering near or hovering over ICBM sites, nuclear weapons storage areas, or similar locations. Beginning in February 1982, after each and every telephone conversation with one of those individuals, recorded with their permission, it became clear that someone was tapping my phone.

After each interview, only moments after hanging-up, I received a mysterious call from someone who said nothing, even though I could hear background noises, who then hung-up after 30 seconds or so. I stress that this odd pattern only occurred after I had spoken with this or that veteran, who was divulging dramatic information about one nukes-related UFO incident or another. It never happened after one of my calls to my family or friends, or at any other time. The pattern continued for several months.

Obviously, someone was attempting to intimidate me or, at the very least, was just letting me know that they were aware of who I was talking to. As I have repeatedly said over the years, I guess I was too stupid to be scared because I continued with my efforts to learn what the U.S. government was hiding from the public, relating to UFO activity at nuclear weapons sites.

I now have more than 140 U.S. military veterans on-the-record—I just spoke with a new source earlier today, a former Minuteman missile Electro-Mechanical Technician who sighted a UFO at Minot AFB in 1968—and I am happy to report that the FBI has never contacted any of those guys. In other words, regardless of who was tapping my phone, there were no repercussions for the persons who had agreed to speak with me. And, to date, no one has ever shown up at my door either.

That said, in one recent case, someone did learn about my telephone and email communications with a retired Air Force missile targeting technician who had made a few inquiries on my behalf, relating to a widely-publicized missile communications-disruption incident at F.E. Warren AFB, in Wyoming, on October 23, 2010.

That individual was in touch with a few of the active duty missile maintenance personnel who had responded to the problem, during which 50 ICBMs became temporarily unavailable because the base could not communicate with the launch officers who controlled them. Officially, the disruption had lasted 59 minutes and was caused by an improperly-replaced computer card in a weapons-control processor.

However, what my retired Air Force contact learned about the incident, from the missile maintenance techs who had responded to it, was much different: The event involved an intermittent communications disruption that actually lasted more than a day, not a mere 59 minutes, as the Air Force claims.

More importantly, several independent maintenance teams returned to the base reporting their sighting of a huge, cigar-shaped object in the sky above the missile field. My contact was told that the entire missile maintenance squadron had been unexpectedly assembled and admonished by its commander not to speak about “the things they may or may not have seen” in the sky. Clearly, the aerial object was not a blimp.

Unfortunately, I was later informed by my contact that two of those missile technicians, upon retiring in June 2011, were informed by their superiors that a “flag” had been placed in their Air Force service records, relating to their unauthorized disclosures about the incident. Obviously, someone had been monitoring their emailed conversations with my go-between, who later forwarded their comments to me. This development meant that the two men would have difficulty finding work in the aerospace field after leaving the service.

I of course felt very badly about this development, even though my contact has said that the two individuals had been fully informed that he was passing information on to me about an apparent UFO maneuvering above F.E. Warren’s nuclear missiles during the communications-disruption incident.

In this type of situation—where active duty Air Force personnel leak information about UFOs near nuclear weapons sites to outsiders—the Pentagon becomes trapped by its own deceptive policy of claiming that UFOs pose no threat to U.S. national security. (It was this official stance—UFOs, even if they exist, are not a threat—that was used to justify the closure of the Air Force’s UFO study, Project Blue Book, in 1969.)

The two individuals who reported multiple sightings of the huge cigar-shaped craft by missile maintenance teams at F.E. Warren AFB in October 2010—at a time when 50 ICBMs were effectively offline—cannot be prosecuted for divulging classified information because, among other repercussions, the Air Force higher-ups would have to openly admit that they took the UFO reports seriously and went so far as to admonish an entire missile squadron not to talk about the incident.

In short, any open prosecution of the two men would risk turning a media spotlight on the whole affair, thereby raising public awareness about the true nature of the event—something the Pentagon definitely does not want to happen.

And so the game goes on. The Air Force continues to claim that UFOs pose no risk to U.S. national security. Meanwhile, veterans slowly but surely come forward to report UFOs at various nuclear missile bases—as far back as 1962 and as recently as 2010—which often appeared just as some of America’s nuclear missiles mysteriously malfunctioned. Maybe, someday, the public will be let in on the truth.

Last week, Larry Bryant sent me a letter he had composed on my behalf, directed to the National Security Agency (NSA), asking that any and all NSA files containing information regarding my UFO-related activities to be released to me, pursuant to requirements stipulated in the federal law known as the Privacy Act. That missive has been inserted below.

Hastings NSA Letter - www.theufochronicles.com
-click on image to enlarge-

I suspect that, after a lengthy runaround, I will be told by NSA that no such files exist. Or, perhaps, those files will be discovered to be “missing” just like the FBI files on my research activities. Regardless, the agency certainly will not be candid with me, no matter what the facts are.

Friday, March 28, 2025

Scientific Coalition For UAP Studies Announces 2025 Annual Conference

THE SCIENTIFIC COALITION FOR UAP STUDIES  - www.theufochronicles.com


     The Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (SCU) proudly announces its 2025 SCU Conference, scheduled for June 6–8, 2025, in Huntsville, Alabama. Attendees can again participate in person at the Von Braun Center or virtually from anywhere worldwide.
By SCU
Press Release
3-25-25

The Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (SCU) proudly announces its 2025 SCU Conference, scheduled for June 6–8, 2025, in Huntsville, Alabama. Attendees can again participate in person at the Von Braun Center or virtually from anywhere worldwide.

This year’s conference theme, Foundational Approaches for UAP Studies, continues SCU’s mission to bring rigorous scientific inquiry to the Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) study.

“We believe this conversation belongs in the hands of scientists, engineers, and evidence-based researchers,” said SCU Executive Board member Robert Powell. “SCU’s conference is about creating space for interdisciplinary collaboration and advancing public understanding through data and dialogue.”

The 2025 conference features a distinguished lineup of speakers from across government, academia, and the private sector. Retired Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Jay Stratton, former Director of the UAP Task Force, will deliver the keynote address on Friday, June 6, offering a firsthand perspective on the U.S. government’s evolving approach to UAP.

“Jay Stratton’s leadership helped bring unprecedented focus to the U.S. government’s understanding of anomalous phenomena,” said SCU Executive Board member Rich Hoffman. “We’re honored to welcome him as our keynote speaker and excited for the depth of perspective he brings.”

The 2025 conference will feature a robust lineup of presenters from across scientific, academic, and government sectors, all contributing to a growing body of serious research into a global mystery.

Additional presenters include:

· Douglas Buettner, Ph.D., Deputy Chief Scientist, Acquisition Innovation Research Center (AIRC) · Laura Domine, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian · Stephen Bruehl, Ph.D., Clinical Psychologist and Pain Researcher · Silvano Colombano, Ph.D., former NASA scientist specializing in artificial intelligence and future technologies · Matthew Szydagis, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Physics, University at Albany SUNY · Keith Taylor, Ph.D., Adjunct Assistant Professor, John Jay College of Criminal Justice

“SCU’s goal is to foster critical thinking and interdisciplinary collaboration in pursuit of truth. With so much public and institutional attention now focused on UAP, this is the moment to ground our efforts in science and transparency,” Powell concluded.

Registration and additional information about the 2025 AAPC are available at: https://www.explorescu.org/scu-conference-2025.

About SCU:

SCU promotes and encourages the rigorous scientific examination of UAP, commonly known as Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs). SCU comprises scientists, engineers, members of the high-tech and defense industries, former military, and other professionals, utilizing scientific principles, methodologies, and practices to advance the study of UAP observed and reported around the globe.

The Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization. Contributions to SCU are tax-deductible.

Tuesday, March 25, 2025

UFO Skeptic Simon Holland’s Latest Rendlesham Forest Fantasy

UFO Skeptic Simon Holland’s Latest Rendlesham Forest Fantasy - www.theufochronicles.com

"... in August 1980, a UFO landed near an alarmed building within the WSA complex at Kirtland AFB and only hurriedly left when an armed Air Force security patrol arrived."


     Self-styled “Professor” Simon Holland is a British science filmmaker who also fancies himself an expert on UFOs/UAP. Unfortunately—as several of his YouTube videos clearly demonstrate—he is thoroughly, negatively biased on the topic and has in the past routinely rejected evidence supporting the fact that advanced craft of unknown origin are operating in Earth’s atmosphere and oceans. Indeed, based on what I have seen him pontificate about thus far, it seems that any other explanation for what eyewitnesses report in a given case is preferable in his mind to the most likely one—an unmistakable UAP presence at the time of the incident in question.
Robert Hastings - www.theufochronicles.com
By Robert Hastings
The UFO Chronicles
3-21-25

Regarding Holland's recent, highly-imaginative remarks concerning the well-known, well-documented UAP sightings in Rendlesham Forest and at nearby RAF Bentwaters airbase in the UK, in December 1980—which Holland confidently tells us were actually due to the witnesses unknowingly observing events related to a Top Secret paranormal experiment conducted by the US government—I make the following observations:

First, as my UFOs and Nukes book chapter on the incidents reveals, dozens of former or retired US Air Force personnel who were stationed at RAF Bentwaters or nearby RAF Woodbridge have gone on the record regarding what were unambiguous UAP sightings—involving anomalous, airborne, structural craft—during the late December time-frame.

The information presented in the chapter—including that derived from my tape-recorded interviews with a score of those former US Air Force witnesses—convincingly confirms that the multiple incidents reported involved genuine UFOs, some of which were tracked on radar. Therefore, the mysterious events reported were not in any way related to some fanciful, allegedly classified, paranormal experiment in the woods, as Holland claims.

Importantly, key witnesses including RAF Bentwaters Deputy Base Commander, Lt. Col. Charles Halt, a number of USAF Security Policemen (SPs), and one member of the 2164th Communications Squadron, all confirm that one focus of the anomalous activity was the nuclear Weapons Storage Area (WSA) on the base. At one point, a hovering, circular craft with flashing lights directed multiple beams—laser-like in appearance but unknown in composition—down onto one or more of the reenforced concrete bunkers in which large numbers of the weapons were stored.

Although Col. Halt dutifully refuses to acknowledge the presence of nukes in the WSA, in keeping with official USAF policy of never publicly confirming the location of stored nuclear weapons, their presence has been established via the testimony of some of the SPs who were on base at the time, as well as the findings of various researchers.

Specifically, at that time, the Bentwaters WSA held the largest stockpile of US tactical nuclear weapons in Europe. Had war with the Soviets erupted, the purpose of those “battlefield” nukes was to blunt the anticipated, massive Russian tanks-and-troops thrust into Western Europe predicted by US military analysts.

As my book documents, UAP activity at American WSAs extends back to the late 1940s—at the first atomic bomb storage depots located at Kirtland AFB, New Mexico, and Fort Hood, Texas—and continued to take place at least into the late 1990s, at WSAs located on USAF ICBM bases, including Malmstrom, Minot, F.E. Warren, Loring, Wurtsmith, Grand Forks, and other locations.

Indeed, in August 1980, a UFO landed near an alarmed building within the WSA complex at Kirtland AFB and only hurriedly left when an armed Air Force security patrol arrived. So, the events at the Bentwaters WSA four months later were merely part of a decades-long pattern of UFO activity at nukes storage sites that had occurred for decades and would continue in the future.

In any case, a number of US Air Force witnesses independently interviewed by British researcher Gary Haseltine and myself have confirmed for the record what was clearly a UAP incursion—possibly on two different nights—at the RAF Bentwaters WSA in late December 1980.

If Holland is even aware of those reports, he doesn’t mention it in his video. Instead, he cites a single first-hand source, "Rick, the US Air Force mechanic" who alleges that all of the intriguing goings-on at the base actually related to a highly secret US Government experiment involving unspecified paranormal phenomena.

Improbably, within a day of Holland posting his video about the supposed experiment, he claims that several “scientists, members of the UFO community, the military and the spooks” came forward to confirm, presumably via email or texts, that the paranormal incident had actually occurred.

Really?! Unless Holland already knew those persons and had previously verified their scientific bona fides or military/intelligence community credentials, how can he be sure that the individuals who approached him were who they said they were and, more importantly, were part of, or at least knew about, the alleged secret experiment? As anyone who follows social media posts knows, large numbers of wannabes can be counted on to respond to any given article or video, claiming to know “the real facts” about the subject at hand, whatever it may be.

Clearly, despite Holland’s glaring naiveté in accepting on faith the claims of the individuals who approached him, until all of those persons are publicly identified, their claimed insightful testimony and alleged credentials should not be taken at face value by the rest of us.

Injuries

Simon further mentions that some USAF personnel "were harmed" at Rendlesham Forest in 1980, implying that those injuries occurred as a result of the purported paranormal experiment. Actually, as far as I know, the only person who was physically harmed—or at least has gone public with his medical issues—is former SP John Burroughs. He has repeatedly publicized certain heart problems he currently suffers from that may be due to radiation exposure. Those clearly seem related to Burroughs’ now well-publicized approach on foot—together with former SP Jim Penniston—toward a small, metallic, triangular-shaped craft sitting on the ground in the forest. Indeed, radiation traces were later detected in the three landing gear depressions in the soil where it had landed. According to Penniston, after a short period the craft took off at high velocity and was out of sight in the blink of an eye.

In a video showing Burroughs’ attempts to remember the details of the incident via hypnosis, the former Security Policeman frantically relives the encounter with the UFO, speaking extremely rapidly and obviously under duress.

The key point that I am making here is that Burroughs’ subsequent health issues apparently resulted from his experience involving an anomalous aerial craft of unknown origin, with bright, flashing lights, that had landed in the woods—not as a result of his unwitting involvement in some purported secret paranormal project, as Holland would have us believe.

Ominously, some of the follow-up events at RAF Bentwaters, including the harsh interrogation of SP Jim Penniston—that included the administration of a "truth serum" type drug—occurred in response to Penniston's involvement in the same incident, not because of his stumbling upon some highly-classified paranormal experiment in the Rendlesham Forest, as Holland implies.

A Counter-Intelligence Presence

Holland Further alleges that Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI or just OSI) and CIA personnel from Washington flew into the adjacent Woodbridge base aboard a C-5A cargo aircraft prior to the experiment taking place, presumably to provide extra security and to suppress any information that might leak out about it. However, as the former Bentwaters Deputy Base Commander, now-retired Col. Charles Halt, has repeatedly stated, the OSI agents arrived in the UK only after multiple reports of UAP sightings in the forest and at the WSA had taken place and began to spread as rumors. In other words, OSI's presence was a response to earlier security-related UAP events and had nothing to do with some purported experiment, or project, that Holland self-assuredly claims required them to be present before it took place. Nevertheless, in a follow-up video Holland insists that his own interpretation of events is correct. He says,

“What I’ve been told is that Deputy Base Commander Charles Halt now wants to tell us—admit—that he knows about the project. He was briefed, he knew that a team from the Air Force, from the CIA, from another agency had already arrived in Suffolk, possibly on board the C-5A transport plane that landed at a secure area at Woodbridge. And whatever happened in late December was a planned project, and the planned project was to mess with people, to mess with perceptions, to evoke the highly strange—maybe because Suffolk was the ideal place, a ‘weak’ place of reality…”

While writing this article, I sent Holland’s two videos to Colonel Halt and asked him to comment. He replied:

Recently I came across a couple of YouTube programs on the Bentwaters incident by a “Professor” Simon Holland [which were also subsequently sent to me by Robert Hastings]. I was shocked by the nonsense he presented as fact. I guess some people will believe anything. I was one of the primary witnesses so I feel obligated to comment. His statement that this was a secret government experiment is nonsense, as more than 75 people witnessed the UAP event [that I participated in] from more than seven different locations, some being a mile or more away. There were even radar observations of the aerial objects.

Holland further stated that a C-5A aircraft with CIA personal arrived prior to the event and parked on a newly-constructed parking pad. There was no new pad and although a plane did arrive it was not until after the event. There's no proof its arrival was even related to the event. There is suspicion but no evidence that CIA personal were on the plane. I just wish Holland had done his homework as he, like so many, just muddies the waters.

Once again, as several researchers have uncovered, the incident in which Col. Halt was involved was only one of many over a four-night period—all involving anomalous aerial objects. For example, I was the first person to interview the two USAF air traffic controllers at RAF Bentwaters, Ike Barker and Jim Carey, who tracked on radar an unbelievably fast craft that covered 120 miles in approximately 8-12 seconds. At one point, the UAP stopped instantaneously and hovered not far from the control tower. Barker observed it and described it as the twice the size of an F-111 fighter and looking like an “orangish basketball with portholes around the middle”. After a few seconds, the UFO raced away.

Summarizing, self-titled “Professor” Simon Holland gets just about everything wrong when advancing his latest theory about the nature of the events in Rendlesham Forest in December 1980. If one actually interviews the many witnesses to what occurred, as I and other researchers have, and Colonel Halt did, one quickly learns that the common element in all of their narratives is the presence of what were clearly UAPs—several of them—during all of the extraordinary events that took place.

Thursday, March 20, 2025

No Answers, No Defense Against Mystery Drones - 60 Minutes Investigates

No Answers, No Defense Against Mystery Drones - 60 Minutes Investigates - www.theufochronicles.com

"In 2019, naval warships training off the California coast were shadowed for weeks by dozens of drones. For years, the pentagon did little to dispel speculation these images, taken with night vision equipment, were UFOs."

     Last month – the head of NORAD and NORTHCOM – the military commands that defend North America – told Congress some of those mysterious drones seen flying inside the United States may indeed have been spying. He did not say for whom. 60
By Bill Whitaker
CBS News
3-16-25
Minutes has been looking into a series of eerily similar incidents – going back years – including those attention getting flyovers in New Jersey recently. In each, drones first appeared over restricted military or civilian sites, coming and going – often literally – "under the radar." The wake-up call came just over a year ago, when drones invaded the skies above Langley Air Force base in Virginia over 17 nights, forcing the relocation of our most advanced fighter jets. Our story starts with an eyewitness and an iPhone.

LIVE SIGHTING REPORTS BY MUFON

Mutual UFO Network Logo