"The documentary asserts that an extensive, 80-year cover-up has obscured government knowledge of advanced nonhuman intelligence (NHI) and, perhaps more significantly, reverse-engineering efforts involving technology recovered from crash sites."
| In a rare display of bipartisan unity, members of Congress recently gathered to witness one of the most significant documentary screenings in modern legislative history. "The Age of Disclosure," (ad) a film featuring 34 current and former high- |
By
The UFO Chronicles © 11-21-2025 |
The documentary itself premiered earlier this year at South by Southwest before eventually making its way to Capitol Hill, where it commanded the attention of lawmakers from both sides of the political aisle. This convergence of entertainment and governance speaks volumes about how far the disclosure movement has progressed since the days when even mentioning UFOs could derail a political career. No longer confined to late-night talk shows and conspiracy websites, the UAP phenomenon now demands engagement at the highest levels of American government.
According to those who screened the film, "The Age of Disclosure" presents startling allegations backed by senior officials willing to place their credibility and reputations on the line. The documentary asserts that an extensive, 80-year cover-up has obscured government knowledge of advanced nonhuman intelligence and, perhaps more significantly, reverse-engineering efforts involving technology recovered from crash sites. These are extraordinary claims, but they emerge from the mouths of individuals who have held positions of tremendous responsibility within the nation's defense and intelligence apparatus.
Jay Stratton, former director of the Pentagon's UAP Task Force, appears in the film to make claims that would have been unthinkable in official channels just years ago. Such testimonies from decorated military officers and intelligence professionals represent a fundamental shift in the credibility and seriousness surrounding the subject. When someone of this stature goes on record with such assertions, it demands attention from policymakers and the public alike.
The congressional screening was strategically timed to generate support for the UAP Disclosure Act, a bipartisan legislative effort championed by Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD). This proposed legislation aims directly at dismantling the secrecy that has long shrouded government UFO research and investigations. The fact that Rounds himself appears in the documentary underscores the genuine bipartisan consensus emerging around the need for transparency on this issue.
Representative Eric Burlison (R-MO) articulated the growing impatience among lawmakers during an interview at the screening. "I think we've had enough hearings," Burlison stated bluntly. "It's now time for hard evidence or 'receipts.'" His frustration reflects a broader sentiment among disclosure advocates: mere investigations and hearings, while valuable, must eventually yield to concrete action and the public release of classified materials. Burlison went further, suggesting that President Trump could issue an executive order "tomorrow" to advance transparency efforts, a call echoing throughout the disclosure community.
A critical component of the disclosure movement centers on protecting those willing to come forward with information. Burlison emphasized the necessity for enhanced legislation to safeguard whistle-blowers from retaliation—a concern that reflects the very real experiences of military personnel and government employees who have faced professional consequences for speaking about UAP incidents. As more officials step into the public eye, protecting their legal standing and career prospects becomes increasingly essential.
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), though unable to attend the screening in person, sent a statement affirming her commitment to transparency and destigmatization. She pledged to work within Congress to "eliminate the stigma" surrounding UAP reporting and to ensure that classified records are properly disclosed. Such statements from high-ranking Democrats demonstrate that disclosure advocacy transcends traditional party divisions, grounded instead in principles of government transparency and national security.
The diverse array of officials featured in the documentary—ranging from military leaders to intelligence professionals to elected representatives—reflects this bipartisan character. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other Trump administration figures appear alongside Democratic officials, signaling genuine consensus that the American public deserves answers about what their government has known regarding UAPs.
Producer Dan Farah spent three years crafting "The Age of Disclosure," operating under strict conditions of secrecy to cultivate relationships with insiders willing to participate. His production represents not merely entertainment but a strategic tool within the disclosure advocacy ecosystem. By presenting these officials on film, the documentary creates a public record that transcends classified briefings, congressional hearings, and backroom political discussions. This media strategy acknowledges that public opinion and media pressure remain powerful catalysts for governmental action.
The congressional screening of "The Age of Disclosure" arrives at a pivotal juncture for the UAP disclosure movement. After years of incremental progress—from military whistle-blowers testifying before Congress to legislative proposals advancing protection for witnesses—the moment demands decisive action. The audience of bipartisan lawmakers, equipped with both the documentary evidence and direct pleas from credentialed officials, now faces a choice about whether to maintain the status quo or push their respective leadership for tangible change.
The question facing Washington is no longer whether to discuss UAPs seriously, but rather how quickly the government can transition from disclosure rhetoric to disclosure action. With both legislative proposals on the table and a new administration poised to set policy direction, the window for meaningful change may be narrower than ever before.
No comments :
Post a Comment
Dear Reader/Contributor,
Your input is greatly appreciated, and coveted; however, blatant mis-use of this site's bandwidth will not be tolerated (e.g., SPAM, non-related links, etc).
Additionally, healthy debate is invited; however, ad hominem and or vitriolic attacks will not be published, nor will "anonymous" criticisms. Please keep your arguments/comments to the issues and subject matter of this article and present them with civility and proper decorum. -FW