The Science of UFOs

Tweet

March 24, 1967 - Flight Security Controller, Oscar Flight, near Roy, Montana to Lt. Robert Salas, Deputy Missile Crew Commander - “Sir, we are seeing some strange lights flying over the LCF. They are traveling very fast across the sky, stopping on a dime and reversing course, making ninety-degree turns, and making no engine noise. I don’t think they are aircraft.” This was the report I remember receiving from my topside

By Robert Salas The UFO Chronicles 4-6-18

guard over fifty-one years ago. Anyone who has ever flown a high-speed aircraft or has familiarity aircraft of any type would find this report incredible. However, very similar observations have now been reported many times by credible witnesses. We need to move on from being awed by the “lights in the sky” reflex. It may be time to try and attempt a scientific explanation of the observable flight characteristics of UFOs.

Jean-Pierre Petit

Recently I spent some time with Jean-Pierre Petit at his home in France. For decades he has been a preeminent researcher in Magneto-hydrodynamics (MHD) - an advanced concept for hypersonic flight. He has also researched and published many papers and video on a new Cosmology called Janus. Of late, he published a book titled, “Science from Beyond,” coauthored by Jean-Claude Bourret, where he proposes explanations of observed UFO flight characteristics.

We discussed his theories at length and I came away convinced they should, at least, be considered. I will attempt to briefly summarize these theories but be advised they involve some radical and controversial concepts and more detailed explanations can be found in Petit’s papers and videos.

Hypersonic flight without sound waves, shock waves or turbulent wake by use of Magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) flow:

In 1976 it was shown that, through a full MHD control of the airflow is possible. The creation of shock waves comes from the Mach line compression. In hypersonic regimes the rise of the temperature at the stagnation point is extreme. A Lorentz force (the force that is exerted by a magnetic field on a moving electric charge.) may ensure a complete control of the Mach lines pattern, resulting in avoidance of Mach line compression, so that shock waves do not appear. This could explain the common observation that UFOs don’t produce shock waves and appear to have some sort of ionized gas surround the structure of the craft.

The possibility of interstellar travel in a relatively short time:

If we confine our cosmological model to the Einstein’s schema, based on a single field equation, the limit of the speed of light brings a severe limit to the velocity we can attain during interstellar flight. The present mainstream model includes the action of cold Dark Matter and a cosmological constant, which the mainstream model adds to Einstein’s equations and which is supposed to represent an unknown repellent property in the cosmos. This model is far from satisfactory, carrying two unknown components, dark matter and dark energy, whose nature remains perfectly unknown.

In 1967, Nobel Prize winner A. Sakharov proposed a model of two “twin universes” with opposite arrows of time. The dynamic group theory shows that this time-inversion is equivalent to the inversion of the energy of particles and of their mass.

This suggests a new cosmic model, based on two coupled field equations (the Einstein’s equation being one of the two) that overcomes the problem of dark matter/energy and provides the following interaction schema:

- Masses with same sign mutually attract
- Masses with opposite signs mutually repel

In general this model fits very well the available observational data. For example, it takes into account the acceleration of the expansion of the universe, as based of the data from 740 distant supernovae. The negative mass (with mc2 < 0) emits negative energy photons, which cannot be captured by our telescopes, so that it is invisible to us.

Due to initial instability, the two coupled systems experience different evolutions, which goes with different sets of physical constants. [the speed of light becomes variable, not constant]. When the gravitational instability occurs the dominant negative mass gives the first structures because its time is shorter. It forms a set of spheroidal clusters, which repel positive mass in the remnant space, giving its lacunar structure with big voids. When galaxies form, negative mass invades space between them. Its repellent effect confines them. As recently shown, when a galaxy is surrounded by repellent negative mass, it flattens its rotation curve. The negative lensing effect explains the observed values, challenging the classical explanation of a dark matter halo. Dynamical friction of the galaxy with its surrounding negative matter environment explains their spiral structure. When light emitted by distant galaxies encounters a negative mass cluster the subsequent negative lensing reduces their apparent magnitude and make them appear as dwarves, which corresponds to observation.

Thanks to Sakharov’s Dynamic group theory, it makes it possible to describe precisely this invisible content of the universe. It would be made of negative mass antiprotons, negative mass antineutrons, negative mass anti electrons, negative energy photons, and so on. It gives an alternative interpretation to the fluctuations of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), which reveals the ratio of the two space scale factors in the two entities. This shortens the distances if a craft can invert its mass, so that brings a new insight on the problem of interstellar travel. This goes with a higher speed of light in that second frame of reference c^(-)_/^/_c⁽⁺⁾ ≃ 10. If a craft can move at relativistic velocity the net gain for travel time is 1/1000. Interstellar travel then becomes possible.

How does the possibility of negative mass relate to avoiding high acceleration forces in our airspace?

The energy required for mass inversion could be much smaller than that derived from E = mc², where m is the mass of the craft. Concentrating energy in the surrounding space, possibly through neutronic metastable states, could produce the required conversion.

The following shows how a UFO craft could get transferred in the negative frame of reference:

Then no ‘propulsion system’ is necessary. Quantum effects and energy conservation requirement make it that when UFOs reverse their mass they gain relativistic velocity. The concept of acceleration does not make sense any longer. To be back in the original positive mass frame a new mass inversion stops them immediately. In this way, combining both aerial displacement and mass inversions process UFOs can achieve sharp (90 degree) turns that are impossible in the frame of a classical physics.

In many ways, the different flight characteristics of observations of these unknown craft challenge us. They can move in the air at hypersonic velocity without noise or producing shock waves. They can cruise over interstellar distances. They can disappear in front of our eyes. They execute turns that oppose the laws of classical mechanics.

We are faced to two choices. Either we simply deny their existence and ignore the multitude of observations, or we admit they are real flying objects. Then, considering current improvements in aviation, it forces us to consider the most advanced fluid dynamic technique, MHD. Other aspects, which challenge classical General Relativity suggest a dramatically different paradigm, shifting from Einstein’s model to an extended model, such as the one described above.

See Also:

My Evidence: The Account of Minute-Man Missiles Being Disabled, While UFOs Hovered Over The Launch Facilities

Dr. Eric W. Davis, of NASA's Breakthrough Physics Propulsion Project, Discussed UFOs During Lecture | VIDEO

UFO Propulsion Systems
By Stanton T. Friedman
(Part Four)

REPORT YOUR UFO EXPERIENCE

UFO Propulsion Systems - Pt I (Redux)

By Stanton T. Friedman The UFO Chronicles 7-13-05

     If we deduce from the mountain of evidence that some flying saucers come to earth from near-by solar systems (there are one thousand stars within fifty-five light years, forty-six of which are like the sun), we are immediately faced with two questions:

1). How can a spaceship travel from a near-by solar system to earth in a reasonable time?

2). Once here, how can flying saucers behave the way they are observed to behave?

How do they achieve their reported high speed flight in the atmosphere (thousands of miles per hour), their ability to stop and start abruptly, to move up and down back and forth seemingly with none of the limitations of conventional aircraft? Typically there are no external engines, wings or tails. Usually the objects are relatively silent compared to conventional craft, and a variety of physical and psychological effects are produced on living and inanimate objects in the vicinity. These are the truly technological challenges we face.

The problem must be divided into two parts because there is no good reason to assume that the same propulsion system is used for the long haul and local portions of the trip. It seems reasonable to assume that the huge cigar-shaped “mother ships” into and out of which the smaller disc-shaped craft fly, are the interstellar vehicles and the others are “Earth Excursion Modules” for local travel only.

Mother ships are rarely observed cavorting or flying close to ground level. In Ted Phillips huge collection of trace cases more then 90% of the low-level vehicles are “disc-shaped.” A useful analogy here is the Aircraft Carrier Enterprise, which is nuclear powered and operates at low speed for many months and or years on the surface of the ocean. The much smaller aircraft it carries cannot operate on the ocean but can fly at high speed and altitude for short periods and are highly maneuverable; but they are not nuclear-powered and neither craft could replace the other.

The problem of traveling to the stars must also be viewed from an entirely different perspective then is useful for understanding our recent flights to the moon and flights of instrument packages to other planets. Distances within the solar system can be measured in light seconds, light-minutes, or at most in a few light-hours. Stars at least several light-years away; our chemical rockets carry our astronauts to the moon in about sixty-0nine hours, and the Viking Spacecraft to Mars took about ten months to reach its destination. But they are propelled by forces other then gravity for only seventeen minutes or one hour respectively. The rockets are coasting or slowing down until they are close to the target for almost the entire trip.

The Apollo spacecraft, at an altitude of two hundred thousand miles, is only going two thousand mile per hour although it left the earth going twenty-five thousand miles per hour. If it had been able to accelerate at just one G (a twenty-one-mile increase every second) for just one hour, the final velocity would have been 79,000 mph; for just one day it would have been 1.9 million mph! Peak acceleration during an Apollo launch is actually closer to eight G’s (a 168-mph increase every second).

To understand there forgoing a bit better, note that the acceleration of one G at the surface of the earth equals 32. 17 feet per second, which in turn means that as each second passes velocity is increasing an additional 32.17 feet.

Translated into miles per hour (mph), one-G acceleration means that velocity is increasing at the rate of 21.9 mph per second! At the end of two seconds it is 21.9 mph plus 21.9 mph, or 43.8 mph, and at the end of three seconds is 64.7 mph, and so on.

In just one day at one-G acceleration a velocity of almost two million mph would be reached and the craft would be far out of earth’s gravitational field. For each operation near the earth, gravity effectively pulls the craft at 1260 mph; while in space there is practically no gravitational or atmospheric friction. It is extremely important to recognize that it take approximately one year at one G to approach the speed of light—about 670.000,000 mph—and we can speculate that any space travelers may have refueling or rest and relaxation centers at locations between the stars, so that our earth visitors need not have come directly from their home planet.

See Also:

UFO Propulsion Systems By Stanton T. Friedman (Part Two)

UFO Propulsion Systems By Stanton T. Friedman (Part Three)


Has Dr Subrata Roy Replicated a UFO Propulsion System? NASA is Interested

REPORT YOUR UFO EXPERIENCE