Showing posts with label Senate Intelligence Committee. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Senate Intelligence Committee. Show all posts

Friday, April 02, 2021

Tuesday, July 28, 2020

Do We Believe in UFOs? – Wrong Question

Do We Believe in UFOs? – Wrong Question


     Reporting on the Pentagon program that’s investigating unidentified flying objects is not about belief. It’s about a vigilant search for facts.

We’re often asked by well-meaning associates and readers, “Do you believe in U.F.O.s?” The question sets us aback as
By Ralph Blumenthal and Leslie Kean
The New York Times
7-28-20
being inappropriately personal. Times reporters are particularly averse to revealing opinions that could imply possible reporting bias.

But in this case we have no problem responding, “No, we don’t believe in U.F.O.s.”

As we see it, their existence, or nonexistence, is not a matter of belief.

UFOs, UAP Deserve Scientific Investigation

UFOs, UAP Deserve Scientific Investigation

UAP are a scientifically interesting problem.
Interdisciplinary teams of scientists should study them

     UFOs have been back in the news because of videos initially leaked, and later confirmed, by the U.S. Navy and officially released by Pentagon that purportedly show "unidentified aerial phenomena" (UAP) in our skies. Speculations about their nature have run the gamut from mundane objects like birds or balloons to visitors from outer space.
By Ravi Kopparapu, Jacob Haqq-Misra
www.scientificamerican.com
7-27-20

[...]

Judging the nature of these objects (and these seem to be “objects,” as confirmed by the Navy) needs a coherent explanation that should accommodate and connect all the facts of the events. And this is where interdisciplinary scientific investigation is needed.

Sunday, July 26, 2020

The "Disclosure" Shoe Finally Drops - And it's a Huge Dud!

The 'Disclosure' Shoe Finally Drops - And it's a Huge Dud!


     We reported last week about the widespread expectation among the "Young Guns" of UFOlogy of a groundbreaking UFO Disclosure revelation to be published in the New York Times, approximately right now. Well, the Shoe has now Dropped:

But instead of shock, amazement, and jubilant vindication, the reaction among the UFO Fan Boys is largely that of disappointment and disbelief. Joe Murgia, who we quoted in the previous article as expecting imminent "Disclosure," has now
Robert Sheaffer
By Robert Sheaffer
Bad UFOs
7-25-20
posted to Twitter, "this is not THE article." Quite obviously it isn't.

Pentagon’s UFO Unit Will Make Some Findings Public

Pentagon’s UFO Unit Will Make Some Findings Public


For over a decade, the program, now tucked inside the
Office of Naval Intelligence, has discussed mysterious events in classified briefings.

     Despite Pentagon statements that it disbanded a once-covert program to investigate unidentified flying objects, the effort remains underway — renamed and tucked inside the Office of Naval Intelligence, where officials continue to study mystifying encounters between military pilots and unidentified aerial vehicles.
By Ralph Blumenthal and Leslie Kean
The New York Times
7-23-20

Wednesday, July 22, 2020

Senate's Request For a Public Report On UFOs – 'It's Impossible to Overstate The Magnitude of This ... Directive'

Unprecedented Public Report On UFOs Requested From Senate Intel Committee




A blizzard in hell


     It’s been a week now, and I keep waiting to wake up. Because when I think I’m woke, the “Advanced Aerial Threats” section of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 hasn’t done the disappearing ink thing. Which leads me to believe the Senate Intelligence Committee is serious about ordering the Pentagon to produce a legitimate audit of The Great Taboo, at least as it relates to national security. By December — an unclassified report, with a possible “classified annex” at the end.
Billy Cox By Billy Cox
De Void
6-30-2020

First reaction: What’s the catch? It can’t possibly be this simple. It’s been 50 years since the closure of the U.S. Air Force “Project Blue Book” sham. Fifty years of official avoidance, denial, ridicule and stigma. More than 70 years since researchers with the original government analysis of UFOs, Project Sign, reportedly came back with the theory that the problem was “interplanetary.” And those conclusions – allegedly summarized in a document called “Estimate of the Situation” – were promptly rejected and buried by USAF Chief of Staff Hoyt Vandenberg. At least, that’s the way it’s been framed since before most of us were born.

It is impossible to overstate the magnitude of this heretofore unthinkable directive issued by the Senate last week. It sounds almost, what, too normal, too pro forma, as if the most radical fishing expedition of our lifetime is simply a matter of good bureaucratic housekeeping. Yet, here we are, in a place no one could have predicted even a year ago.

The “how” of why we’re here is the easiest part to figure. Without To The Stars Academy – which has been lambasted in small but obstreperous corners as the propaganda arm of some hidden hand – there is no “Advanced Aerial Threats” mandate in the Senate package. Period. For all of its flaws during and after its 2017 rollout, TTSA, guided most credibly by Luis Elizondo and Chris Mellon, has accomplished the impossible. Can we all at least agree on that?

Already, De Void has heard grumblings about the timing of the Senate’s move, coming just weeks before the second season of History’s “Unidentified: Inside America’s UFO Investigation.” Some critics charge the series, which premieres on July 11, couldn’t have gotten a better marketing boost than a Senate inquiry. Which is true. And so what? If this is brainwashing, bring it on. What theory are “they” promoting? What do “they” want us to believe? Who are “they”? Game on.

The more relevant question is, do 100 elected public officials, with limited demonstrable knowledge of this persistent mystery, have the long view on what they’ve gotten themselves into?

Ostensibly, the Senate’s primary objective is to determine whether or not Uncle Sam is facing a technology gap created by “adversarial foreign governments.” The Senate also wants to include an FBI review of data collected on incidents over “restricted United States airspace” – not a bad idea to bring a civilian agency into the mix. But at what point will this push for interagency cooperation clash with their perceived proprietary interests?

Consider the briefly famous Stephenville incident from January 2008, which suggested more about the military’s knowledge of tactical UFO behavior than about the UFO itself. Radar records retrieved from the FAA and National Weather Service (the Air Force would provide no records of its own) indicated there were no military interceptors in the air at all when the no-fly zone over President Bush’s “Texas White House” was apparently being challenged by an object without a transponder.

We know, for instance, that on at least three prior occasions during the Bush administration, Air Force warplanes swarmed and forced down private pilots who were either lost or stunting as they violated the security perimeter above Bush’s place. We also know, thanks to the civilian radar data, that F-16s from Carswell Air Force Base came to within a mile of the same object(s) when it emerged some 65 miles to the northwest, an hour or so earlier. That’s when the intruder initially popped up over Stephenville, leaving a handful of eyewitnesses at separate locations in cattle country to report a massive and brazenly slow-moving flying machine cruising low over the plains.

Were there no jet fighters in the vicinity of the Bush residence that evening because pilots had been waved off? Have there been briefings about potentially catastrophic UFO countermeasures? Because it wasn’t as if the USAF had lost interest in the event. A FOIA-assisted reconstruction of that event assembled by Robert Powell and Glen Schulze implied the entire incident was being monitored by another plane, possibly an AWACS surveillance craft, circling high above at 41,000 feet. Wonder what those pilots would have to say?

“The Air Force should be in the hot seat because they’re in charge of patrolling our skies,” says UFO historian Jan Aldrich. “I think they’re enjoying seeing the Navy in the hot seat.”

Founder of Project 1947, which displays primary source documents on UFOs dating back to back to the early nuclear age, Aldrich called the Senate’s move a “bolt from the blue,” nothing he thought he’d see in his lifetime. But is the political system structured to accommodate the complex legacy of this puzzle? Noting how the formal inquiry is directed primarily at the Office of Naval Intelligence, which confirmed the existence of its  Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force, Aldrich offers a 1952 Look magazine story for perspective. It’s a map based on USAF data showing Cold War era UFO hot spots across the U.S.

“It’s all over our defense installations,” the Army veteran notes of the historical UFO penetrations, “and in more than half a century, nothing has really changed.” Furthermore, says Aldrich, many of “the best” UFO cases, like incidents involving the old Strategic Air Command, never made it into Blue Book. Will lawmakers care about going that deep into history?

And there’s a clause in the “Advanced Aerial Threats” section indicating the need for “an official accountable” for “an interagency process for ensuring timely data collection and centralized analysis of all unidentified aerial phenomena reporting for the Federal Government, regardless of which service or agency acquired the information.” That’s bigger than huge. It’s the key. Who might that person be? Military or civilian? An Edward Condon or a James McDonald? It would be a pleasant surprise to learn that anyone inside the Beltway knows either of those names.

America is facing reckonings on many fronts – science, the economy, race, income inequality, health care, sociology, and issues we haven’t even begun to recognize. And now, finally, apparently, this. Are we capable of getting it right? Are there any honest brokers out there with the integrity to steward a fair and dispassionate accounting of history’s most explosive story? Or is it already too late for that?

De Void isn’t convinced this whole thing isn’t an extended old-school dream sequence, doomed to end on the clatter of teletype or an urgent voice-over from a Movietone newsreel: “Bulletin! Putin Blows Up Capitol Dome, President Not Informed! UFO Senate Report — Delayed!”

Failing that … Christmas is coming. Ready or not.

Tuesday, June 30, 2020

Luis Elizondo Responds to The Senate’s Vote on UFOs – VIDEO

Luis Elizondo Responds to The Senate’s Vote on UFOs

     The former head of the Pentagon's UFO program (AATIP), Luis Elizondo, appeared on the Tucker Carlson show, with guest host Brian Kilmeade to offer his views of the recent news
By Fox News 6-26-20
concerning the Senate Intelligence Committee's vote to publicize classified UFO data.

[...]

Brian Kilmeade: Luis, if the Senate gets what they want what will they get?

Luis Elizondo: I think this is a historical moment in our country for many reasons. I think it's fair to say that this certainly is a nonpartisan issue. Thanks to the courage of Senator Marco Rubio but others before him, such as Harry Reid and Stevens and Inouye ... I think if the Senate is successful in getting what they want, they're going to get actual hard data as to the capabilities of these incursions into our airspace and the airspace ... of where we have combat vehicles ... hopefully we can get a better understanding of what's going on here. These things seem to appear and operate without impunity both here in the United States and overseas, where our brave men in and women are in uniform and hopefully we'll finally be able to piece this together.

Brian Kilmeade: Luis, how do you know?

Luis Elizondo: Well, because I was part of a program for about ten years back in the Pentagon called AATIP. I ran that program with several colleagues of mine, and it was an inter-agency organization very much like this task force that you are seeing right now that's being proposed in this bill.

 Brian Kilmeade: What's the most intriguing thing that we'll get from it, if the Senate Intelligence Committee gets what you know?

 Luis Elizondo: Hopefully, you're gonna get an unclassified report, and for the first time average Americans are going to get a chance to see the very same data that has been locked away if you will in classified briefings and what not, and hopefully see the light of day for once.

Brian Kilmeade: Now, I consider myself an average American, can you tell me what is says, since you part of the unit?

Luis Elizondo: Well, unfortunately, I'm not employed by the U.S. government anymore, and I'm still bound by my non-disclosure agreements, my NDA's I still have a security clearance ... so that's really a conversation that the U.S. government's going to have to have ... the executive branch with the legislative branch and then finally decide what they think is appropriate for the American people. I think what I can is that data is very compelling. And when you look at these vehicles and what they're able to do, you very quickly realize that this is probably not something in our own inventory.


 See Also: 



Sunday, June 28, 2020

US Navy ‘UFO Task Force’ Exists, and Senator Rubio Wants Its Data

US Navy ‘UFO Task Force’ Exists, and Senator Rubio Wants Its Data


     The Office of Naval Intelligence has an “Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force,” and U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio is requesting a detailed analysis of their findings.

By Justin Sedgwick www.fox10phoenix.com 6-26-20
The reveal of both the task force’s existence, as well as Rubio’s data request, came in a June 17 Select Committee on Intelligence report authored by Rubio on the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021.

The report states that the committee supports the efforts of the task force to collect and standardize data regarding “unidentified aerial phenomenon (UFOs), as well as their links to foreign governments and potential threats.”

Friday, June 26, 2020

Unprecedented Public Report On UFOs Requested From Senate Intel Committee

Unprecedented Public Report On UFOs Requested From Senate Intel Committee

Lawmakers want to know what data exists, how it's shared, what threats
these craft might pose, and if an adversary has new breakthrough tech.


     Members of the U.S. Senate have expressed concern that the U.S. military, as well as other federal government agencies, have not been giving the appropriate amount of attention to reports of encounters with unidentified aerial phenomena, or
By Joseph Trevithick The War Zone 6-23-20
UAP, more commonly referred to as unidentified flying objects, or UFOs, which may be linked to America's adversaries. They are now looking to order the Director of National Intelligence to work with other relevant agencies to produce a report detailing just what information they have on UAPs already, how that data is collected and processed, how it is getting shared, and just what kind of threats or other risks these objects might pose.

The call for the UAP review was included in a report accompanying a draft of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 that Senator Marco Rubio, a Florida Republican, submitted on behalf of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on June 17, 2020.

The US Navy Has a 'UFO Task Force,' As Confirmed By The Senate Intelligence Committee

The US Navy Has a 'UFO Task Force,' As Confirmed By Senate Intelligence Committee


Marco Rubio wants a "detailed analysis of unidentified aerial phenomena data and intelligence reporting collected or held by the Office of Naval Intelligence, including data and intelligence reporting held by the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force."
     The Senate Intelligence Committee wants the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Defense to create a comprehensive, unclassified report concerning unidentified aerial phenomena upon the passing of a Senate appropriations bill initiated by Senator Marco Rubio, Motherboard has learned.
By MJ Banias and Tim McMillan
Vice
6-23-20

A recent Senate Intelligence Committee report on the bill, which concerns funding the government's intelligence activities, recommended its passing. It also asked for a “detailed analysis of unidentified aerial phenomena data and intelligence reporting collected or held by the Office of Naval Intelligence, including data and intelligence reporting held by the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force.”

US Senate Committee Aims To Regulate UFO Information

US Senate Committee Aims To Regulate UFO Information



     The US Senate intelligence committee is aiming to regulate a Pentagon UFO program so that the public is better informed of its activities and the country's intelligence branches can more easily share information.
By phys.org
6-24-20

The panel said that it "supports the efforts of the Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force," officially confirming the program's continued existence, in a provision to the annual intelligence authorization bill.

The Senate Intelligence Committee Votes On Public Analysis of UFOs

The Senate Intelligence Committee Votes On Public Analysis of UFOs



Senators want the public to see the government's UFO reports

"This issue has lacked attention from senior leaders," the Senate Intelligence Committee says.

     The Senate Intelligence Committee has voted to require U.S. intelligence agencies and the Defense Department to compile a detailed public analysis of all data collected on "unidentified aerial phenomenon," including intrusions recorded by Navy pilots in recent years.
By Bryan Bender
www.politico.com
6-23-20

The provision contained in the annual intelligence authorization bill, which still needs to be adopted by the full Senate, sets up an unusually public debate on Capitol Hill about how extensively the government has been tracking high performance aircraft of unknown origin, or UFOs.