Showing posts with label Malmstrom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Malmstrom. Show all posts

Sunday, July 06, 2025

The Black Vault Lays Bare the Fallacies of the WSJ Articles

The Black Vault Lays Bare the Fallacies of the WJS Articles  - www.theufochronicles.com



     The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), long considered a bastion of serious journalism, as readers know recently published a two-part series on UFOs/UAP. For those of us paying attention to these matters, on its face it, prior to the read it was presumed given
By The UFO Chronicles
6-30-2025
WSJ’s long-held good standing that they would approach the topic with journalistic neutrality, being fair and balanced (no pun intended) if you will; however, rather than serving as a balanced entry into a complex field, the articles—according to veteran researcher John Greenewald (and many others) of The Black Vault—represent a glaring case study in narrative bias, selective sourcing, and evidentiary omission.

John Greenewald - www.theufochronicles.com
Greenewald’s critique (video below) delivered in a detailed livestream dated June 28, 2025, raises several scientifically and journalistically significant concerns. His experience—as an extensively interviewed source who saw none of his evidence-based input included—offers a unique vantage point for assessing not only the WSJ’s reporting, but the broader implications for public understanding of UAP data.

Misdirection by Design: Framing the UAP Topic as Disinformation

At the heart of Greenewald’s critique lies the assertion that the WSJ framed the entire UAP issue as an orchestrated disinformation campaign—primarily by the U.S. military to mask classified aerospace technologies. This framing is not novel; Cold War-era narratives often suggested that UAP sightings were encouraged to conceal stealth aircraft like the U-2 or SR-71.

What is problematic, Greenewald contends, is not the inclusion of this hypothesis but its presentation as the primary explanatory model, unsupported by robust sourcing. The series leaned heavily on anecdotal recollections, such as a story of an Air Force colonel allegedly planting fake UFO photos in a Nevada bar. According to Greenewald, such stories were offered without corroborating documentation, effectively reducing decades of global UAP data to the level of rumor and myth.

Selective Silence: Ignoring Documented, Declassified Evidence

Perhaps the most serious allegation Greenewald levels against the WSJ is the deliberate omission of government-verified documentation. According to Greenewald, he provided the paper’s reporters with hundreds of pages of primary source material—obtained legally through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)—showing long-term, classified interest in UAPs across multiple agencies including the DIA, CIA, NSA, and DoD.

These “heavily redacted and classified UFO specific documents” span decades before and beyond Project Blue Book’s official closure in 1969. Greenewald emphasizes that if UAPs were nothing more than Cold War-era misidentifications or misinformation, such persistent classification—well into the 2000s and beyond—would make little logical sense.

By omitting these materials, the WSJ not only narrowed the scope of the article but arguably misled its readers about the state of official knowledge and concern. The result is a narrative vacuum—one that falsely suggests there is no "there" there, when in fact substantial government documentation confirms otherwise.

The “Yankee Blue” Incident: Reporting Without Verification

The WSJ series introduced a claim about “Yankee Blue,” an alleged Air Force hazing ritual in which personnel were tricked into believing they were part of a classified UAP retrieval program. The articles claimed this practice was so persuasive that it led individuals to whistleblow under false assumptions, and that even Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines was briefed and stunned by the discovery.

While intriguing, Greenewald sought to verify this account by filing multiple FOIA requests with the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) and other oversight agencies. As of his broadcast, no records confirming investigations or official documentation of Yankee Blue were found.

Again, the WSJ’s failure to corroborate this sensational claim—or even provide the alleged memo—violates basic journalistic standards. In the absence of documentation, presenting such narratives as fact risks crossing the line from skepticism to disinformation by omission.

Ignoring the Global Scope: The Helicopter & Nuclear Incursions

Another significant gap in the WSJ reporting was the failure to address documented incidents of UFO/UAP incursions over nuclear facilities and military installations, both in the U.S. and internationally. Greenewald referenced declassified reports from the 1970s describing encounters with unidentified helicopters and craft over Strategic Air Command bases and nuclear storage facilities.

Whether these were terrestrial, foreign adversary, or genuinely unknown in origin, they represent verifiable, unresolved cases involving national security infrastructure. The WSJ not only ignored these cases but also failed to investigate how often UAP sightings involve highly restricted airspace—an analytical dimension critical to any good-faith inquiry.

Instead, the paper chose to cast doubt on one well-known nuclear incident involving Robert Salas in 1967, by citing an EMP weapons test document that was not contemporaneous with the event and appears to misalign with the technological timeline. No sourcing or technical analysis was provided to support the implication that EMP testing could explain the missile shutdowns.

Bias by Comparison: Hypocrisy in Evidentiary Standards

Greenewald also highlights a double standard in how evidence is weighed. Critics of whistleblowers like David Grusch and Luis Elizondo often decry the lack of hard documentation supporting their claims. Yet many of those same critics celebrated the WSJ article, which itself provided no documentation to substantiate its central claims about misinformation campaigns, safe contents, or hazing rituals.

Misused Authority: Mistaking Mastheads for Truth

Perhaps the most important theme in Greenewald’s video-editorial is the misplaced trust in journalistic prestige. The Wall Street Journal, he notes, is a masthead that commands credibility. But when that reputation is used to publish poorly sourced claims under the guise of investigative reporting, it becomes a vehicle for institutional bias rather than public service.

Greenewald makes clear that the WSJ had every opportunity to tell a more complete, balanced story. They had interviews with researchers, access to primary source documentation, and ample time to investigate claims. That they did not reflects not a lack of information, but a lack of editorial will.

The call for UFO/UAPs transparency has been extant since the birth of modern day Ufology in 1947. Conversely, this is goal has been led by independent researchers, such as John Greenewald and or Independent UFO organizations along the way—the Fourth Estate which should be the spearhead in this endeavor has been a hindrance at best and or erroneous propaganda machine at its worst. The Wall Street Journal’s recent articles, as criticized by John Greenewald continue in this vein.

Conclusion: A Call for Scientific Integrity in Journalism

The call for UFO/UAPs transparency has been extant since the birth of modern day Ufology in 1947. Conversely, this is goal has been led by independent researchers, such as John Greenewald and or Independent UFO organizations along the way—the Fourth Estate which should be the spearhead in this endeavor has been a hindrance at best and or erroneous propaganda machine at its worst. The Wall Street Journal’s recent articles, as criticized by John Greenewald continue in this vein.

They present a narrow hypothesis (disinformation) as definitive explanation. They ignore decades of declassified documentation. They promote unverified anecdotes over publicly available evidence. And they selectively report claims that align with their narrative, while excluding equally credible counterpoints.

In doing so, the WSJ has not advanced the public conversation—it has obscured it. And that is perhaps the greatest disservice of all: Not the conclusion the paper drew, but the conversation it chose not to have.

As Greenewald reminds us, skepticism is not the rejection of possibility. It is the insistence on evidence—consistently applied, transparently sourced, and fairly examined. That principle must guide all inquiry into UFOs/UAPs, from FOIA requests to front-page stories. Anything less is not journalism. It’s misdirection.

Thursday, June 19, 2025

UFOs and Nukes Researcher Robert Hastings Refutes WSJ Article

New Wall Street Journal UFO Article Badly Misses the Mark - www.theufochronicles.com

New Wall Street Journal UFO Article Badly Misses the Mark


     In a recent article titled, “The Pentagon Disinformation That Fueled America’s UFO Mythology”, the Wall Street Journal attempts to foist its own disinformation on all of us. Several knowledgeable persons have already indignantly responded on X, or in podcasts such as WEAPONIZED, hosted by journalist George Knapp and researcher Jeremy Corbell.

I have instead directed an email to the Journal’s Correspondence and Corrections Editor, Judi Walsh, also copying the article’s two authors, criticizing one particular part of the factually-inaccurate, arguably-absurd piece. It has been inserted below. Thus far, I have not received a response from Walsh or the authors.
Robert Hastings - www.theufochronicles.com
By Robert Hastings
The UFO Chronicles
6-12-2025
My email:
From: ufohastings@aol.com

To: judi.walsh@wsj.com, wsjcontact@wsj.com

Cc: joel.schectman@wsj.com, aruna.viswanatha@wsj.com

Tue, Jun 10 at 6:25 AM

Ms. Walsh,

I am the leading civilian researcher on the topic of UFO/UAP activity at US nuclear weapons sites, as described in declassified US Air Force documents and the testimony of 167 vetted USAF veterans who were involved in such incidents at various bases during the Cold War era and beyond. Those individuals were independently interviewed by me between 1973 and 2010.

CNN's livestreamed coverage of my September 27, 2010 "UFOs and Nukes" press conference in Washington D.C. is available at http://www.ufohastings.com, on the homepage. Seven of the veterans participated, and most are still available for questioning by the WSJ's reporters, should they be interested in doing that.

At the press conference, a former Minuteman missile targeting officer stationed at Malmstrom AFB, Montana, Captain Robert C. Jamison, revealed his team's involvement in retargeting ten ICBMs that had been simultaneously knocked-offline on the evening of March 24, 1967. This missile-shutdown event was the one mentioned in your recent article, in which the authors wildly speculated that the missiles' mysterious loss of functionality was due to a test involving an Electromagnetic Pulse generator, meant to demonstrate their vulnerability to EMP during wartime. As [redacted] has already brought to your attention, the available facts easily debunk this groundless claim.

According to Captain Jamison, multiple targeting teams, including his, were given an unprecedented "special UFO briefing" prior to being released to the field, during which it was stated that a "UFO" had caused the multiple-missile failures. The teams were instructed to report a UFO to their command post, should one be sighted while they traveled to the full-flight shutdown site at Oscar Flight, near Roy, Montana. They were further instructed that, should a UFO appear while they were on-site at one of the Launch Facilities--underground missile silos--they were to quickly enter the silo and close the personnel access hatch, while leaving their Security Police escort above ground so that he could provide updates to the base via a two-way radio.

The other Air Force veterans appearing at my press conference provided similar accounts of their own UFO-related experiences, at other bases, during different time-frames.

Indeed, as my four-decade-long research project has convincingly established, bona fide UFO incursions at US nuclear weapons sites—fissile material production plants, weapons test ranges and storage facilities, nuclear bomber and missile bases—occurred as early as January 1945, and as recently as October 2010, and the incidents over that period numbered in the hundreds.

Nevertheless, given the embarrassing lack of factual rigor evident in your reporters’ recent effort, I rather doubt that my research findings will be of much assistance to them. Assuming that the article was not an intentional attempt at disinformation, their profound ignorance of the UAP topic, coupled with their clearly unjournalistic bias, renders them unqualified to educate your readers.

Sincerely,

Robert L. Hastings

So, we will see whether I receive a response from any of the Wall Street Journal staff members, and/or whether my email is posted online by their website. I’ll update those reading this post.

Sunday, September 01, 2013

UFOs Reported by Civilians Living Within Malmstrom AFB’s Nuclear Missile Field: Sightings Occurred in July and August 2013



Bookmark and Share

Witness House & Oscar 7
Witness' house near Malmstrom AFB's Oscar-07 missile silo
- click image to enlarge -

By Robert Hastings
www.ufohastings.com
8-31-13

     Malmstrom Air Force Base, located east of Great Falls, Montana, is the command and control center for 150 Minuteman-III nuclear missiles operated by the 341st Missile Wing. The ICBMs themselves are scattered across the north-central part of the state, organized into groups of ten called “flights”, and deployed in underground steel and concrete silos, known as Launch Facilities (LFs)—each one connected by an electrical cable to a central launch-control site, known as a Missile Alert Facility (MAF).

In mid-October 2012, I traveled to Montana after learning of multiple, independent UFO sightings a few weeks earlier by civilians living within the huge Malmstrom missile field. Upon arriving at the Fergus County Sheriffs’ Office, in Lewistown, I was allowed to review their “blotter”, a chronological summary of law enforcement-related activity. Sure enough, I quickly discovered a number of UFO reports from around the county, beginning in mid-September.

The most dramatic sighting had been phoned in by Jennifer Styer, who lives east of the small town of Roy, which is located at the center of Oscar Flight, a mile or so northwest of the Oscar MAF. On the evening of September 19th, she reported seeing two V-shaped craft, silently flying wingtip-to-wingtip, coming from the direction of the Oscar-03 Launch Facility.

Styer told me, “They came out of nowhere, so fast! They were right on top of me before I noticed them. But they were big! Each one was a V-shape and had orange lights on each [leg]. I don't remember how many lights because it happened so quickly.”

The craft flew at low altitude almost directly overhead, prompting a startled Styer to contact the sheriff, to ask whether Malmstrom was flying any military aircraft over the area. The log entry in the blotter states that Central Montana Dispatch had contacted the base but was told that no such aircraft were out by Roy that night.

After leaving Lewistown, I drove to Roy and spoke with a dozen or so townspeople, all of whom told me that UFO sightings were a common occurrence in the area. Several persons told me that military activity had picked up significantly during the previous month, with Air Force security patrols and missile maintenance vans in evidence, in far greater numbers than was normal. All of that started, I was told, around the time of Jennifer Styer’s sighting.

Before leaving Montana, I drove to the nearby town of Hilger and met with Mark Zuidema, who told me that he had seen a number of apparent UFOs over the years and had even kept a log of such incidents. I asked him to immediately contact me by phone should he have a sighting in the future.

On November 1, 2012, at 8:31 p.m., Zuidema called me at my home in Colorado and told me that, at 8:13 p.m., he had seen another UFO. He said he had been inside his house when everything suddenly started shaking, so he ran outside to see what was happening. A military helicopter flying at extremely low altitude was rapidly moving away, in an easterly direction, apparently toward Roy. However, what caught Zuidema’s eye next was intriguing: A small, white globe of light was also streaking eastward, staying just a short distance in front of the chopper, which was obviously pursuing it. He watched the spectacle until both were out of sight.

I told Zuidema to keep me updated, should anything else occur. At 9:07 p.m., he called again and said that another (or the same) helicopter had appeared just north of Hilger and was sweeping the ground with a spotlight. He watched it until it disappeared in the distance. After hanging up, I recorded the date/time and made a few notes relating to the incident for future reference.

Two days later, I spoke with Toni Keller, who lives south of Roy, who saw a lot of helicopter activity near her place that same night. She told me that three choppers had been shining spotlights toward the ground between 8 and 9 p.m. Keller said that they had been maneuvering in the vicinity of Rattlesnake Butte. The Oscar-07 Launch Facility is located one mile south of that geological feature, a fact that might be relevant in view of more recent events.

This Summer

On August 6, 2013, at 10:10 p.m. Mountain Time, Mark Zuidema called and told me that he had just observed “a white, oval-shaped object” in the sky, apparently heading toward Roy, or at least in that direction.

About an hour later he called a second time and said that he had just seen a “sparkly, blue-green light” hovering low in the sky, again in the direction of Roy. Zuidema quickly acknowledged that it was impossible for him to say whether the light was much closer than the town, located some 21 miles to the east-northeast, or well beyond it. He did say, however, that the light had disappeared—gone out—after 15 seconds or so, ruling out the possibility that he was looking at a star or planet near the horizon.

After I suggested that a cloud could have passed in front of the light, creating the illusion of it going out, Zuidema said that the sky was completely clear and added, “I have been a stargazer for many years and I have never seen a star or planet that was that particular shade of blue-green. It was striking.”

Hoping to find someone living in or near Roy who may have seen the blue-green light, or the white, oval-shaped object, I contacted Jolene Smith, who I had met in the fall of 2012. She told me that another local resident had recently reported seeing a strange “shooting star moving sideways” near her home south of town.

I then called the witness, who wishes to remain anonymous, who told me that she had been watching television when she saw, out of her living window, an “oblong, florescent blue object” moving near the ground, in an east-to-west direction. After a few seconds, it broke into two objects, which kept moving along the valley floor in tandem until they gained altitude and disappeared over a low mountain ridge west of her house.

I asked the witness to describe the apparent size of the object, using a standard question of mine: “If you held a dime at arm’s-length, was it larger than that?” She replied that it was much, much larger and said that, before breaking in half, it had reminded her of “a small Volkswagen” automobile.

Not surprisingly, at least not to me, the witness’ house is a quarter-mile west of the Oscar-07 missile silo and the mysterious object seemed to her to be even closer than that when it was observed.

As the conversation was winding down, I was about to ask her the approximate date of the sighting when she said, “I recorded the date and time in my diary. Would you like me to go look?” It turns out that the incident occurred on July 9, 2013, at 9:45 p.m. Mountain Time, or approximately one month prior to Mark Zuidema’s August 6th sighting.

I suspect that other residents living within the boundaries of Malmstrom AFB’s missile field, near Oscar Flight and elsewhere, have also seen bona fide UFO activity this summer. I am currently making further inquiries in the hope that I can locate additional witnesses.

In the 1960s

UFO sightings by U.S. Air Force security personnel posted at ICBM sites operated by Malmstrom AFB are an ongoing affair. The most famous cases occurred in March 1967, according to the testimony of three former or retired Minuteman missile launch officers—Capt. Robert Salas, Col. Frederick Meiwald and Col. Walter Figel.


A fourth officer, Capt. Eric Carlson, denies any knowledge of UFO activity at Malmstrom, despite tape recorded statements by his deputy missile commander, Walt Figel, who told me in 2008 that Carlson was sitting “two feet away” from him when he took a call from a missile security guard who reported seeing a “large, round object” hovering over one of Echo Flight’s Launch Facilities. Within two minutes, all ten missiles had malfunctioned. That occurred on March 16, 1967.

Figel said that two other airmen, comprising a Security Alert Team that he had dispatched to the missile site, also reported seeing the UFO, thereby confirming the initial report. Both Figel and Carlson were later debriefed about the incident and told, “Don’t talk about it,” according to Figel, who kept his silence until 1996, when he mentioned it to former launch officer Bob Salas, during another taped telephone conversation.

Salas had his own UFO encounter, at Oscar Flight, on March 24, 1967, when as many as 10 ICBMs mysteriously malfunctioned moments after a disc-shaped craft was reported to be hovering over the Oscar Launch Control Facility (LCF). At the time, Salas had been sitting at the missile-readiness console in the underground launch control capsule.

Col. Frederick Meiwald substantiated most of Salas’ statements about the incident during a taped telephone conversation with me in 2011, saying that he couldn’t confirm everything because he had been on a rest break in the capsule when Salas woke him up, telling him that the flight’s missiles were dropping off alert status.

But Meiwald did acknowledge that, moments later, he had ordered a Security Alert Team to respond to an alarm at one of Oscar’s launch facilities, and that those men had briefly seen “a bright, flying object at low-level” hovering over it, before quickly fleeing back to the Oscar LCF. One guard was so badly shaken by the experience, according to Meiwald, that he had to be transported to the hospital at Malmstrom before the end of his shift.

In the 1970s

The following North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) log entries, relating to UFO sightings at Malmstrom’s Launch Control Facilities and Launch Facilities, were listed in an official U.S. Air Force letter released to researchers in 1977, via the Freedom of Information Act. The time of each report is expressed in Z or Zulu Time, the military’s version of Greenwich Mean Time. My own comments, in brackets, follow a few of the log entries:
24th NORAD Region Senior Director’s Log (Malmstrom AFB, MT)

7 Nov 75 (1035Z) Received a call from the 341st Strategic Air Command Post (SAC CP), saying that the following missile locations reported seeing a large red to orange to yellow object: M-1, L-3, LIMA, and L-6...Commander and Deputy for Operations (DO) informed.

7 Nov 75 (1203Z) SAC advised that the LCF at Harlowton, Montana, observed an object which emitted a light which illuminated the site driveway.

7 Nov 75 (1319Z) SAC advised K-1 says very bright object to their east is now southeast of them and they are looking at it with 10x50 binoculars. Object seems to have lights (several) on it, but no distinct pattern. The orange/gold object overhead also seems to have lights on it. SAC also advised female civilian reports having seen an object bearing south of her position six miles west of Lewistown. [Note that all of these reports refer to the observation of aerial “objects.” Apparently, the Security Alert Teams could not identify them as either military or civilian aircraft.]

7 Nov 75 (1327Z) L-1 reports that the object to their northeast seems to be issuing a black object from it, tubular in shape. In all this time, surveillance has not been able to detect any sort of track except for known traffic. [In other words, when these sightings were first reported by SATs, radar personnel at Malmstrom AFB and Great Falls International Airport could not detect any unknown aerial objects near the missile sites. As we shall see, radar contact with the UFOs was finally established as the sightings continued to unfold.]

7 Nov 75 (1355Z) K-1 and L-1 report that as the sun rises, so do the objects they have visual.

7 Nov 75 (1429) From SAC CP: As the sun rose, the UFOs disappeared. Commander and [Director of Operations] notified.

8 Nov 75 (0635Z) A security camper team at K-4 reported UFO with white lights, one red light 50 yards behind white light. Personnel at K-1 seeing same object.

8 Nov 75 (0645Z) Height personnel picked up objects 10-13,000 feet. Track J330, EKLB 0649, 18 knots, 9,500 feet. Objects as many as seven, as few as two A/C. [Height-finding radar finally confirmed that UFOs were present, varying over time between two and seven in number.]

8 Nov 75 (0753Z) J330 unknown 0753. Stationary/seven knots/12,000...two F-106...NCOC notified. [Radar confirmed that one UFO, at an altitude of 12,000 feet, had hovered—that is, was “stationary”—before resuming flight at a leisurely 7 knots, or 9 mph. Shortly thereafter, two F-106s were scrambled to intercept it.]

8 Nov 75 (0905Z) From SAC CP: L-sites had fighters and objects; fighters did not get down to objects.

8 Nov 75 (0915Z) From SAC CP: From four different points: Observed objects and fighters; when fighters arrived in the area, the lights went out; when fighters departed, the lights came back on; To NCOC. [As SAT personnel at four different locations watched, the UFOs played cat-and-mouse with the F-106s, extinguishing their illumination as the jets approached their position and re-illuminating themselves after the fighters returned to base. The NORAD Combat Operations Center (NCOC) in Colorado Springs, Colorado was immediately informed of this incident.]

8 Nov 75 (1105Z) From SAC CP: L-5 reported object increased in speed—high velocity, raised in altitude and now cannot tell the object from stars. To NCOC.

9 Nov 75 (0305Z) SAC CP called and advised SAC crews at Sites L-1, L-6, and M-1 observing UFO. Object yellowish bright round light 20 miles north of Harlowton, 2 to 4,000 feet.

9 Nov 75 (0320Z) SAC CP reports UFO southeast of Lewistown, orange white disc object. 24th NORAD Region surveillance checking area. Surveillance unable to get height check. [Note the reference to the UFO having a “disc” or saucer shape. Two more log entries from November 9th confirm that UFOs continued to be reported by SAT teams positioned near various missile launch facilities.]
In the 1980s

Another dramatic UFO sighting only recently came to light when former USAF Security Policeman Joseph C. Pscolka, Jr. agreed to be interviewed about his intriguing experience at Malmstrom’s Alpha-1 Launch Control Facility in the fall of 1986. During that event, ten UFOs cavorted in the sky, “like crazy fireflies”, witnessed by numerous security personnel posted at five different LCFs comprising the 10th Strategic Missile Squadron. Pscolka and his colleagues were subsequently debriefed and ordered to sign national security non-disclosure statements.

These cases are only the tip of the iceberg and I cover several more in my book UFOs and Nukes. I am asking anyone, whether ex-U.S. Air Force or civilian, to contact me at ufohastings@aol.com with their knowledge of UFO activity at Malmstrom’s nuclear missile sites—or at those operated by any other U.S. Air Force base—regardless of the time-frame. All responses, after being vetted, will be kept strictly confidential unless I am granted permission to publish them.


Continue Reading . . .

See Also:

UFOs Reported Near Malmstrom AFB’s Nuclear Missile Sites in September 2012: Two V-Shaped Craft Sighted Southeast of Oscar Flight Launch Facility O-03

The Air Force Cover-Up:
"Deception, Distortion, and Lying to The Public About the Reality of the UFO Phenomenon"


Mysterious Leak at a Nearby Missile Launch Facility Forces Closure of Highway; Malmstrom AFB Cites "Abnormal Readings"

Telephonic Interview with Colonel Walter Figel (USAF Ret) By Robert Hastings - 1 of 3

Telephonic Interview with Colonel Walter Figel (USAF Ret) By Robert Hastings - 2 of 3

Telephonic Interview with Colonel Walter Figel (USAF Ret) By Robert Hastings - 3 of 3

Ten UFOs Cavort Above Nuclear Missiles at Malmstrom AFB: Air Force Witnesses Quickly Silenced

Former U.S. Air Force Security Policeman Ponders UFO Activity During Incident at Nuclear Missile Site





SHARE YOUR UFO EXPERIENCE

Monday, May 20, 2013

UFOs Interfering with US Missiles; Former Capt. Bob Salas Opened The Flood Gates on This Aspect of the UFO Phenomenon

Former Capt. Bob Salas


Robert Salas and Me


Kevin Randle     By Kevin Randle
A Different Perspective
5-19-13

     While in Roswell a couple of years ago, I shared, briefly, a table with Robert Salas of Malmstrom missile fame. He was a little more serious about selling his book than I was in selling mine and at one point he snapped at me for joking with the UFO museum patrons. I hadn’t spoken to him since that time in Roswell. I mention this for the context it will provide for some later comments here.

At the recent Citizen Hearing I saw him again. At the Sunday evening dinner for those who were participating in some fashion… that is, the former members of Congress, the witnesses which included researchers, and those volunteers who helped Steve Bassett to organize the Hearing, I made my way up front to speak with Bassett. On my way back I passed the table where Salas sat. He looked up at me and I said, “You can say, ‘hello,’” which, of course he did.

The next day, we ended up on the bus arranged to transport everyone from the hotel to the National Press Club and back. We were the only two on it, and we spoke again, briefly. I asked him a couple of questions about what had happened at Oscar Flight in 1967.

I have said it before and I’ll say it again. If Salas was alone in his claims, then we could reject them simply because you’d expect others to have had similar experiences. Of course, there was a series of UFO sightings near Belt, Montana on the day that Salas claimed the UFO caused the missiles of Oscar Flight to “go off-line.” And, there were the documented events of Echo Flight which had happened just days before when all ten of their missiles did the same thing. In other words, Salas was not alone, and the other man in the capsule with him at the time, Fred Meiwald, confirmed the event.

There was a minor discrepancy. Salas said all the missiles had gone off line but his boss, Meiwald said only four or five. In the original information, Salas, according to what he said to me, “Split the different and I said eight.” He now has said all ten were involved.

Swearing in of the Missileers at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., May 2013

Meiwald, interviewed by others including Robert Hastings for UFOs and Nukes, confirmed what Salas had said. The missiles had gone off-line, in essence failed. Combined with the documentation about Echo Flight, the words of Salas took on added weight. In fact, Salas appeared in Washington, D.C. with two other officers who had been assigned to missile flights at other military bases who had experiences with UFOs. In other words, there are a number of reports of this sort and contrary to what the Condon Committee said this was a matter of national security.

I suppose I could point out here that all said they had been required, at the time, to sign nondisclosure agreements. They wouldn’t reveal what they knew and would not talk to others at their bases about this. It was a way to keep the information from spreading among the missile crews.

At any rate, we chatted on the short ride from the National Press Club to the hotel. Salas gave me a little more information and a slight preview of what he would say the next afternoon in front of the committee. I was there to watch, listened to Salas as he reported what he had seen, heard and done, and then listened to two other officers say some of the same things. UFOs had penetrated the missile sites and shut down the missile guidance systems. If an outside source could do that, it was a matter of national security. At the time, if the Soviets had been able to do that, they could have rendered our entire strategic missile system useless. They could shut it down from outside the system and prevent retaliation. But, of course, they didn’t have that capability, but in the 1960s and the 1970s, nobody knew that for certain.

It was sometime Thursday afternoon that I bumped into Salas again. It was just after several men from around the world had told of their experiences with UFOs and their governments attitudes about UFOs had testified. Salas came up to me and wondered if I could help him sell some of his books… It was a joke, related to what we had our spat about in Roswell. For those interested, his book is Faded Giant written with Jim Klotz is available at Amazon and probably other on line bookstores.

The real point here is that Salas opened the floodgates on this one aspect of the UFO phenomenon. He was among the first to talk about UFOs interfering with US missiles. Others, such as those who testified with him, and Jim Penniston and John Burroughs who had testified that morning, suggest that UFOs have interfered with our atomic weapons (which, I must point out here might not be a bad thing but that slides off into the realm of political opinion and not relevant here). All of that made for compelling testimony (and now we can hear that Rendlesham was a lighthouse and rabbit holes), and even if it was not alien in nature, national security was involved. Someone, or something, had caused the trouble at the missile sites.

Say what you will about Salas, he is not stand alone… and for me, he seems to have mellowed a little bit as well. Such is the world in which we travel.

Friday, November 16, 2012

Mysterious Leak at a Nearby Missile Launch Facility Forces Closure of Highway; Malmstrom AFB Cites "Abnormal Readings"


Bookmark and Share

Malmstrom Public Alert (Edt)

Highway reopens after launch facility incident

By David Murray
www.greatfallstribune.com
11-15-12

     A connector route linking Highway 191 east of Roy with Highway 87 at Grass Range, was closed for nearly 20 hours Wednesday and Thursday while Air Force personnel responded to a mysterious leak at a nearby missile launch facility. The closure of U.S. Highway 19 forced traffic traveling between the central Hi-Line and the Yellowstone Valley to divert through Lewistown, adding 50 miles to the trip between Havre and Billings.

The exact reason for the closure remains unclear. Late Wednesday afternoon, Malmstrom Air Force Base’s Public Affairs Office released the following statement:

“While performing routine maintenance in a Launch Facility northwest of Lewistown at approximately 1 p.m., Malmstrom personnel detected abnormal instrument readings. We are working to ensure the safety and security of the people in the area is maintained during this response. At this time we only know that we have picked up abnormal readings and actions being currently taken are only a precaution. . . .

Friday, June 17, 2011

Echo Flight UFO Incident Not Unique: Retired Col. Frederick Meiwald Says “Bright Object” Also Sighted During OSCAR Flight Missile Malfunctions

Echo Flight UFO Incident Not Unique
Bookmark and Share


By Robert Hastings
www.ufohastings.com
6-14-11

Robert Hastings     On September 27, 2010, seven U.S. Air Force veterans took part in a press conference in Washington D.C. during which they discussed dramatic UFO incursions at nuclear weapons facilities in the 1960s and ‘70s. CNN streamed the event live–see below:


Robert SalasOne of the participants, former USAF Captain Robert Salas, spoke of being on duty as an ICBM launch officer at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana, in March 1967, when a UFO disrupted key systems in each of the ten Minuteman nuclear missiles under his control. Although Salas first divulged the astonishing Oscar Flight UFO Incident in 1995, and had even discussed it at previous public events, the unprecedented, worldwide media coverage surrounding the September 2010 UFO-Nukes Connection press conference resulted in huge publicity for the still-classified case.

On the other hand, intriguing, corroborative statements by the other officer on duty during the Oscar missile-shutdown event, now-retired Colonel Frederick C. Meiwald, have received far less attention. Although Meiwald had candidly discussed it during a tape-recorded telephone conversation with Salas in 1996, his reluctance to talk about the subject further has been obvious.

Nevertheless, during a second telephone interview, conducted on May 6, 2011, Col. Meiwald cautiously confirmed to me that a “bright, flying object at low-level” had indeed been sighted near one of Oscar Flight’s missile silos during the disruption event. Then-Captain Meiwald had received the startling report from a two-man Security Alert Team sent to the site by his deputy missile commander, First Lieutenant Bob Salas, to investigate the reason for triggered alarms there. After making their report to Meiwald by radio, the terrified team had raced back to Oscar’s Launch Control Facility, frantic to get inside. The men had apparently been so distraught that they had to be transported back to Malmstrom before the end of their normal work shift.

Later, after returning to the base themselves, Meiwald and Salas had been debriefed by an agent from the Air Force’s Office of Special Investigations (OSI) and ordered to sign national security non-disclosure statements relating to the incident.

An audio link to my taped conversation with Meiwald appears below.

Faded GiantMeiwald’s revelations are especially important because a number of UFO debunkers, following the cue of James T. Carlson, have noisily claimed that Bob Salas has been lying about his UFO-related experience at Oscar—allegedly making up the story to increase sales of his book Faded Giant, in which the topic of UFOs at Malmstrom AFB’s missile sites is extensively examined.

But Carlson’s oft-repeated, frequently hysterical accusations are completely untrue, according to Col. Meiwald, who told me that Salas has reported the UFO-related events at Oscar Flight “very accurately.”

During the incident, deputy missile commander Bob Salas had been on alert in the underground Launch Control Capsule when he suddenly received a frantic telephone call from his head guard, the Flight Security Controller, saying that a glowing, oval-shaped craft was hovering over the ground-level Launch Control Facility (LCF). Within seconds, one of flight’s ICBMs malfunctioned—its guidance and control (G&C) system disrupted by an unknown force.

Salas quickly alerted Captain Meiwald, who had been resting at the time, whereupon Meiwald took his position at the commander’s consol. Within a minute or two, all ten missiles had dropped offline, according to Salas. (Meiwald recalls the number as six-to-eight.) Regardless, had U.S. President Lyndon Johnson ordered a nuclear strike against the Soviet Union at that moment, most or all of Oscar Flight’s ICBMs would have remained in their subterranean silos.

Just as this crisis was unfolding, alarms began sounding in the launch capsule, indicating that the security at some of Oscar’s widely-separated missile silos (known as Launch Facilities or LFs) had been breached. Salas immediately ordered Security Alert Teams to those locations to investigate. According to Col. Meiwald, that is when one of those teams reported observing a UFO near one of the sites. But let’s now listen to Meiwald, as he tells the story himself:

Robert Hastings’ Call to Col. Frederick C. Meiwald

What follows is a partial transcript of my May 6, 2011 telephone interview with Col. Meiwald. Emphasized words are italicized; confidential comments have been excluded at Meiwald’s request; numerous “uh” and “um” sounds, uttered by both of us, have been eliminated for easier reading, although I retained a few of them when appropriate.

After I introduced myself to Meiwald and described my association with his former deputy missile commander, Bob Salas, I asked Meiwald whether the telephone interview might be tape-recorded. He agreed and our conversation about the mass-missile shutdown incident at Malmstrom’s Oscar Flight, in March 1967, began.

(Unfortunately, an electronic hum mars the quality of the tape and makes Meiwald’s soft voice hard to hear at times. However, if one reads the transcript below while listening to it, the colonel’s important comments are discernable.)


FM: Okay, essentially, I was resting—whether or not I was sound sleep I don’t recall—but I know Bob got me up because we had unusual indications on the consol, plus we’d had a security violation and, uh, the response team that [inaudible] had gone out to investigate at one of the LFs. They reported unusual activity over there and—by that time I was up—and saw consol indications. [I] also directed that the strike team return to the LCF while maintaining radio contact on the way back. As they came back we did lose radio contact for a short period of time, however, the flight [security] leader—the person who was in charge at the time—recognized the team as it was approaching the LCF and opened the gate so that his troops could get in.

RH: Okay. The letter that you sent Bob [on October 1,] 1996 elaborated on the phone conversation that you and Bob had—uh, I think it was in August 1996—in which you said that the persons, the Security Alert Team that had gone out at, I guess, Bob’s direction, had seen something that scared them silly and they beat a hasty retreat back to the LCF. Do you remember that part of it?

FM: That’s basically true. I can’t remember [my] exact words, but they were directed to come back to the LCF upon completion of their mission [inaudible].

RH: Uh, they apparently described seeing an object in the sky. Do you remember any of the details?

FM: I remember them saying something along those lines [inaudible] to me. Beyond that, I couldn’t elaborate.

RH: Okay. Now, when Bob, I think moments [after] he woke you up, or you got up and sat down at the commander’s consol—he of course had received a call from the Flight Security Controller, saying that there was a bright red, oval-shaped object hovering over the security fence gate—my understanding is that is what he told you as soon as you were at your consol, that he had received this call and, uh, that of course coincided with the missiles beginning to malfunction. Do you recall him telling you that?

FM: I really don’t remember that portion of it, relative to the bright object. I remember an unusual condition [but] as far as the details, uh, I can’t elaborate on that.

RH: Okay. He of course has also said that you two were, uh, when you were back at Malmstrom, you were debriefed by OSI and required to sign non-disclosure statements. Do you remember that?

FM: I remember being directed to do that. But that was no problem. I’ve been one of these people, when told to forget something, I forget it—eventually [inaudible].

RH: Right, well, is that a polite way of saying that you really don’t want to discuss this, even though you know more than you’re saying?

FM: No, I’m saying I don’t remember.

RH: Okay, well, it’s been 44 years. That’s right.

FM: That’s right!

BREAK:

Hastings tells Meiwald that he will send the colonel links to various articles he has written about the UFO incidents at Malmstrom AFB. (A new one—summarizing an earlier UFO-related missile shutdown incident at Malmstrom’s Echo Flight, on March 16, 1967, some eight days before the Oscar Flight incident—has recently been posted at this website. The article contains audio links to my taped interviews with retired Col. Walter Figel, a former ICBM launch officer, who confirmed that a “large, round object” had been reported hovering over one of Echo’s missiles just as that entire flight failed. This contradicts the statements of the other officer on duty at Echo that day, Captain Eric Carlson, who claims to have no memory of UFOs being involved. Debunker James Carlson is Eric’s son.)

RH: Walt Figel, even though he has told me—he was in the same situation that Bob was, basically—Eric Carlson was resting and Walt was at the [deputy commander’s] consol over at Echo and suddenly his first missile dropped offline. When he called the security guard who was out at the site—because the site was down overnight for maintenance; there was a two-man maintenance team there, and the security guard—when Walt Figel called the security guard, to ask if the team was working on the missile, uh, at some point the security guard said there was a quote large, round object end quote hovering directly over the silo.

And, even though he’s acknowledged all of that and even though he said that, uh, back at base, he and Carlson were debriefed and told not to talk about this, he nevertheless has gone on-the-record about there being a UFO hovering above the missile when it went down. Now, you may or may not know—even though he admits that took place and that Echo was a real event and there was a UFO present when the missiles failed—he does not believe that the incident at Oscar ever took place. In fact, he’s come just shy of calling Bob Salas a liar.

FM: Oh, is that right?

RH: Absolutely, and, you know, I know that you have confirmed Bob’s story...and yet Figel has just decided that this never happened. Um, so how would you respond to something like that? You’ve described the Security Alert Team being out in the field, seeing this object, and beating a hasty retreat to the [LCF] and yet Figel says none of that ever took place.

FM: We had an incident in October [sic] Flight. Whatever happened over at Echo, I have no idea. What Walt Figel may have relayed [to Bob Salas, during a taped phone conversation] 15 years ago, versus what he’s saying at the present time, I have no idea. I have no way of making a judgment upon what he has, uh, expressed whatsoever. I think since leaving Malmstrom I have only seen Walt Figel one time and, uh, not even to talk to him. So I can’t verify—and I certainly don’t know [his] motives. All I know is relative to the situation within Oscar Flight itself and, basically, what Bob Salas has relayed, relative to our actions at Oscar. I can’t verify anything outside of that.

RH: Okay...I think you got a call, or maybe an email or two from James Carlson, who is the son of Eric Carlson. Eric, uh, James Carlson, rather, has spent the last three years posting [hundreds] of posts, literally [hundreds] of posts all over the Internet, saying that Bob Salas is a liar and a fraud; that there were no UFOs at Malmstrom; there were no incidents such as Bob has described. When you apparently corroborated part of Bob’s story—the part after you were awake, in your taped phone conversation in ‘96 and in the letter you wrote, when you confirmed what you could recall of it at that time—Carlson [subsequently] said he still doesn’t believe it happened and he still continues to call Bob a liar and a fraud.

FM: All I can say is something happened [at Oscar] and, to the best of my knowledge, Bob Salas has stated what he believes [to be] true and I’ve supported the majority of what he has said. I have read his book and [although] I can not, you know, support what other folks are saying, I know what happened at Oscar. I know that Bob has relayed what happened at Oscar very accurately. But, what goes beyond that, I am not in a position to even express a viewpoint. I certainly can’t question somebody else’s judgment. Uh, I think it would be best if I said no more.

RH: Okay. But you will at least confirm that there were reports from the Security Alert Team [at Oscar] of a UFO at the LF they were out at, is that correct?

FM: Yes!

RH: Okay, and it was quite clear that object was saucer-shaped—or do you recall what the description was, other than it being a UFO or a flying saucer? Do you have any sense of what they reported to you?

FM: All I remember is a bright object; a bright, flying object at low-level. Beyond that, uh, I can’t say.

RH: But they were terribly frightened by their experience?

FM: They were upset and were directed to come back to the LCF.

RH: Okay, and I believe you said in your [1996] letter that they were so frightened that they actually had to go [back to Malmstrom] early; they couldn’t complete—

FM: Well, uh, one man I know was directed to go back to the base, at least one of them was—

RH: Okay, and—

FM: —Whether or not they flew a special helicopter out there to get him or not, I don’t recall that, but I know that he did go back to the base a very upset individual.

RH: Okay. Do you remember, well, you’re willing to confirm, as Bob has said, that your debriefing was in the presence of an OSI agent? Is that correct?

FM: That did take place.

RH: And you were required to sign non-disclosure statements about the incident?

FM: Right.

RH: Okay. Well, to be redundant here, what you were involved in—and what the other 120 people [who] I’ve interviewed over the years were involved in at various bases—is dramatic history. I mean, it’s American history. It’s suppressed history but, hopefully at some point, you know, your grandchildren, your great-grandchildren, are going to read about it in the history books, because it’s real and it’s quite obviously important—

FM: Okay, do you want to turn off the recorder, just for a moment? I have a side comment about something.

RH: Sure. You have my word [that] it’s off.

After making a comment that must remain confidential, Col. Meiwald gives Hastings his address. Hastings says he will type-up the transcript of the conversation, at least the relevant portions, and forward it to Meiwald, together with a copy of his book UFOs and Nukes.

END OF TRANSCRIPT

Meiwald’s first conversation regarding the Oscar Flight shutdown incident, taped-recorded by Bob Salas in 1996, resulted in nearly-identical admissions by Meiwald. A partial transcript of that interview, together with a link to the audio tape itself, appeared in my article, “The Echo/Oscar Witch Hunt”, which I posted at The UFO Chronicles website in September 2010. The transcript appears again here:

Bob Salas’ 1996 Telephone Call to Col. Frederick Meiwald

Salas began by asking Meiwald whether he recalled the earlier UFO-related missile shutdown at Echo Flight—given that researcher Jim Klotz had recently accessed declassified documents relating to it and, therefore, knew the flight’s designation. In response, Meiwald said that he didn’t recall the Echo incident, only the one he and Salas had been involved in, at Oscar Flight.


FM: I just remember [laughs] our side of it.

RS: Yeah, alright, here’s the sequence I remember: I remember receiving a call first and the security guard said, ‘I’ve seen some UFOs up here flying around,’ and I said, ‘Ah, forget it.’ I, uh, didn’t believe him. I kinda hung up on him. And then, a little while later—I don’t know how long it was, maybe five, ten minutes, maybe longer—they called back and the guy sounded real scared and said there was [a UFO] just outside the front gate. And, uh, he also said, I recall, that one of the other guards had gotten injured in some way. I don’t think it was from the UFO; I think it was from, uh, trying to climb the fence or something like that. Uh, and then I hung up, or he hung up because he had to go—his guard got injured—and then I, I believe you were either getting up or I woke you up—and then some of our missiles started shutting down. Is that right?

FM: Uh huh.

RS: Is that about how you remember it?

FM: Right. We had security alarms and, uh—

RS: Yeah.

FM: —and problems at a couple of the, uh, sites.

RS: Yeah, okay, okay. Well, I’m sure glad I found you. [Both laugh]

[Were there] any reports from the field about UFOs?

FM: I remember that two guards that we had had gone out to one of the sites and finally got back scared to death and we had to relieve them of duty.

RS: Yeah. Oh, you mean our guards?!

FM: Yeah.

RS: Oh, I didn’t know that.

FM: Yeah, a roving patrol type—

RS: Oh, I see—

FM: —and had gone out to one of the sites, uh, the LFs, and on the way back they lost radio contact and we ended up having to send them back to the base early—I’m not sure what happened but I don’t think they ever returned to, uh, guard duty.

RS: What were they scared about?

FM:Oh, they had seen these, some crazy things and—

RS: Oh, they did?!

FM: Yeah, and—

RS: And they reported that to you?

FM: They reported it to the topside guy [the Flight Security Controller]—

RS: Oh, the topside guy. That’s right. Okay, okay. Okay, well, interesting, don’t you think?

FM: Yeah! [Both laugh]

END OF TRANSCRIPT

Col. Meiwald’s Follow-Up Letter to Bob Salas

Meiwald elaborated on all of this in an October 1, 1996 letter (seen below in its entirety) to Salas which may be read in its entirety. According to Meiwald, the “crazy thing” that had frightened the guards so badly was a UFO. Excerpting from that letter:

“My records indicate that we were formed as a crew in Sept 66 in ‘N’ [November Flight] status. I don’t have the date of update to ‘R’ [Romeo Flight]. Our home site was Oscar. I left crew duty for the Command Post in early Nov 67.”

“Related to the incident itself, I recall us being at the Oscar LCF. Topside security notified us [that] the mobile team had reported a ‘UFO’ while responding (obviously at your direction) to a situation at an outlying LF—this particular one being located just east of Highway 19, the state highway which runs north from Grass Range to the Missouri River. With little or no direction from higher authority (Command Post or Alternate Command Post), the Security team was directed to return to the LCF, maintaining radio contact at all times, as the security system reset. While enroute back to the LCF, radio contact was lost and remained out until the security vehicle approached the LCF. Two very upset young men wasted no time getting back inside.”

“I do not recall personnel injury of any type but the two individuals were sent back to the support base early. I heard second-hand that one was released from security team duties.”

END OF LETTER EXCERPTS

Meiwald Letter 10-1-1996- click on image(s) to enlarge -
Meiwald Letter 10-1-1996

In a May 9, 2011 email to me, Bob Salas wrote, “I told Fred about the UFO over the gate of the LCF as he was waking up from a nap. The second [UFO] report apparently came to Fred from the FSC after the shutdowns and after I had directed the security team to one of the Oscar LFs, due to security incursion lights. Apparently the FSC communicated to Fred that an object was seen by the team as they were out responding to that security incursion. I was not a part of that conversation but I recalled Fred telling me about it after he wrote to me in 1996.”

So, despite James Carlson’s unfounded claim that Bob Salas has fabricated the story about having been involved in a full-flight missile shutdown at Malmstrom AFB, in March 1967, Salas’ former missile commander, now-retired Col. Frederick Meiwald, has confirmed that such an incident did indeed happen—at Oscar Flight—and that the Security Alert Team sent out to investigate tripped alarms, just after the disruptions occurred, had been “scared to death” by the UFO they saw hovering over one of the silos.

James Carlson has known about all of this since September 2010, when I posted my “Echo/Oscar Witch Hunt” article at The UFO Chronicles, containing the audio link to excerpts from Salas’ taped 1996 conversation with Meiwald. Not that it matters. True to form, Carlson has continued to brazenly lie about the dramatic events at Malmstrom AFB, claiming that no one other than Bob Salas has confirmed a UFO presence during the missile shutdowns.

Fortunately, relatively few people—mostly hardened skeptics irrevocably biased against the UFO reality—have been duped by Carlson’s bogus claims. As for the rest of you, please circulate a link to this article far and wide. Simple facts, presented by the witnesses themselves, are the best antidote to the debunker’s shameless dishonesty.

. . . More

See Also:

The Echo Flight ICBM Incident: Retired USAF Officer Confirms Receiving A UFO Report Just as the Missiles Failed

The Echo/Oscar Witch Hunt

My Evidence: The Account of Minute-Man Missiles Being Disabled, While UFOs Hovered Over The Launch Facilities

Telephonic Interview with Colonel Walter Figel (USAF Ret) of March 8, 2010 (Link 1)

Telephonic Interview with Colonel Walter Figel (USAF Ret) of January 8, 2009 (Link 2)

Telephonic Interview with Colonel Walter Figel (USAF Ret) of October 20, 2008 (Link 3)

VIDCAST: Former Boeing Engineer, Robert Kaminski Confirms UFO Activity at Echo Flight Missile Launch Control Facility in 1967

Malmstrom Air Force Base Picks Up UFO on Radar; "Sabotage Alert Team Located Another UFO Directly Over The Base"

UFO Lands Near Minuteman Missile Base; Affects Radio Transmissions - Defensive Measures Taken!

UFO Sightings at ICBM Sites and Nuclear Weapons Storage Areas

Air Force Staff Message: Malmstrom AFB Receives Multiple Reports of UFOs in The Great Falls, Montana Area

UFOS & NUKES | U.S. Air Force Fighters Chased UFOs at Malmstrom AFB in the 1960s and ‘70s

Whatever It Is The Air Force Must-Hunt For The Flying Saucer

UFOs & NUKES | Missile Shut Down at Malmstrom Confirmed By (Civilian) Veteran of Minuteman Program

UFOs & NUKES | UFOs Have Penetrated Restricted Air Space Over Nuclear Missile Sites; Jammed Vital Electronic Equipment & Eluded Fighter Aircraft

SHARE YOUR UFO EXPERIENCE


HELP SUPPORT THIS SITE


ABOUT DONATIONS

Follow UFOChronicles on Twitter

THE UFO CHRONICLES

↑Grab this Headline Animator