Showing posts with label By Larry Bryant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label By Larry Bryant. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 06, 2022

Zechel's UFOlogical Naked Emperor at the CIA

Zechel's UFOlogical Naked Emperor at the CIA

     As obituaries go, it's about as nondescript as you can imagine, its 120 words painting a silhouette of a man who, unbeknownst to the uninitiated reader, managed to accumulate more enemies than friends during his 63 years on planet Earth.

Well, I'm talking not about UFOlogical iconoclast James W. Moseley (publisher-editor of the gossipzine "Saucer Smear") but about one of Moseley's unfavored acquaintances -- W. Todd Zechel, who according to "Smear's" Oct. 10, 2008, issue, died in relative obscurity on Nov. 14, 2006. (Moseley, of course, remains with us, headed toward octohood.) Both men had been
Larry Bryant
By Larry Bryant
The UFO Chronicles
11-7-2008
cigarette-smokers; in Zechel's case, his obesity and smoking probably caused him to sustain a stroke several years before his demise.

In his later years, Zechel (who might've enjoyed being called the "Colombo of UFOlogy") had a tacit but nevertheless self-destructive approach to interpersonal relations: if you can't successfully attack your enemies, then just go ahead and attack your friends. Somehow, "Todd the God" (as he liked to be called) viewed me as a friend -- one who, alas, could be regularly exploited whenever Zechel felt so inclined.

If Zechel could lay claim to any lasting self-descriptor, it might go like this: "The Ultimate practitioner of the strategy called 'the end justifies the means.'" Even so, he possessed a folksy, ribald sense of humor, a slightly commendable irreverence toward official authority, an abundant talent for stalking/milking his research prey, and an enviable knack for writing.

It was in the latter category that I received my final word from him -- cranked out via an e-mail message addressed to me and to several other persons on May 8, 2006. (Having no computer of his own, he relied on the communal computer service at his local public library.) His message consisted of an essay titled "The CIA's Most Secret Counterintelligence Project: The Condon Committee." One of his e-correspondents at the time -- Frank Riccardi, director of the [now defunct] UFO-research web site of eyepod dot org -- has posted the essay's contents as part of the Eyepod's online newsletter called The Alien Chronicles -- Issue 2-23.

In light of recent rumors about the U. S. Central Intelligence Agency's (alleged) interference with the (alleged) plans by certain U. S. Navy insiders to jump-start some official U. S. disclosure of the extraterrestrial presence (allegedly via a series of high-level talks at secret UN-sponsored venues), I'm presenting, below, the text of Zechel's j'accuse smoking gun -- as a sort of elongated epitaph.

Meantime, readers desiring to learn more about Zechel's investigatory projects will find his biographic sketch and other reprinted material at the Internet Archive site.



THE CIA'S MOST SECRET UFO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE PROJECT: The Condon Committee
By W. Todd Zechel
Investigative Journalist
Former NSA/ASA Communications Specialist
(c) 2006

     When the U. S. Air Force, under Congressional pressure, appointed Dr. Edward U. Condon of the University of Colorado to head a purported "independent scientific study of UFOs" in 1966, it was the end result of the CIA secretly taking charge of UFO intelligence in late 1957, having gained control of "'scientific intelligence" within the intelligence community. Between 1958 and 1966, the Air Force had been stuck in the publicly humiliating position of having to pretend it was the U.S. government agency responsible for studying UFO sightings and related events for whatever intelligence could be obtained. But in reality it was the CIA that had wrestled control away from the USAF by proving to the National Security Council (NSC) that the Air Force had completely bungled the job and was incapable of handling it without covering itself in proverbial eggs.

Dr. Condon had worked on the ultra-secret Manhattan Project during WW II, helping develop the Atomic Bomb. Later he became the head of the National Bureau of Standards, which assisted in American scientific, technical development. But in early 1951 he suddenly left the Bureau to become the director of research and development at Corning Cookware in upstate New York. But unlike the previous director, Condon did not specialize in developing pots and pans at Corning; but instead he spent his time developing missile and rocket nose cones and heat shields/ablation shields for America's space program -- Condon had been and was a key member of the National Aeronautics Advisory Committee (NACA), the forerunner of NASA. In fact, Condon is reputed (within supersecret circles) to have based his heat shield developments on the analysis of recovered extraterrestrial material*, after he left the National Bureau of Standards at the behest of President Truman.

In reality, Condon was chosen to head the UFO study in order to get the Air Force off the hook, the USAF being in the position whereby it had to pretend it was studying UFOs, while behind the scenes and in secret the CIA was conducting the real study. In point of fact, the CIA would utilize the Condon Committee to collect UFO intell, while at the same time promising the USAF it would ultimately debunk and dismiss UFOs, which was done in what became known as "The Condon Report."

In February 1967, Condon and four other scientists associated with his study secretly met with CIA officials at the National Photographic Interpretation Center (NPIC) in downtown Washington, D.C., where U-2, SR-71, and satellite spy photos were analyzed utilizing state-of-the-art computer enhancement techniques. After being briefed and given a dog-and-pony show by NPIC's founder and director, Art Lundahl, who implored Condon's group to obtain some good UFO photos/films for NPIC to study, Condon issued a nationwide appeal through the media for citizens to send the Condon Committee UFO photos/films to assist the purported "impartial" study of UFOs, post-haste. In reality, the photographic evidence was being sought for the CIA to further its secret study of UFOs, on-going since the early 1950s but without a mandate until late 1957.

In April 1967, a Condon Committee researcher, Dr. Gerald Rothberg of Stevens Institute, Hoboken, N.J., was dispatched to Harrisburg, Penn., to investigate an on-going local UFO flap. Accompanying Rothberg, disguised as research assistants, were two covert CIA officers, one of whom was Fred Durant, a highly experienced and knowledgeable CIA Office of Scientific Intelligence officer who typically operated under a cover of being a civilian scientist, lastly with Avco-Everett Research Lab, where he was reputed to be conducting R&D with recovered E.T. material*. Durant and his partner brought with them a van load of high-tech detection equipment such as frequency scanners, plus advanced photographic gear. The CIA men mounted a special "all-sky" tracking camera atop Harrisburg's largest hospital, interviewed local civilian UFO witnesses, and met with the Harrisburg chapter of NICAP, then the nation's largest and most influential civilian UFO group, headed by an anti-UFO secrecy activist, Maj. (Ret) USMC, Donald Keyhoe.

Condon's most valuable service to the CIA, however, began in 1968 when another Condon Committee press release invited Soviet Union scientists to participate in his purported "independent scientific study" of UFOs. Condon was just dangling bait for the CIA, trying to get Soviet officials into a "non-aggression" treaty on UFOs. Subsequently, Condon "researchers" -- some of whom were covert CIA officers -- met with Soviet Bloc scientists in Eastern Europe, where the treaty parlay was set in motion.

According to information provided in confidence to the author by the late Art Lundahl, founder and original director of the CIA's National Photographic Interpretation Center (NPIC), the highly proficient CIA center where U-2, SR-71, and satellite recon photos were analyzed, in February 1969 a high-ranking Soviet KGB official flew to Washington, D. C., in order to meet with the CIA hierarchy and work out a sort of non-aggression pact on UFOs whereby each side would pledge not to falsely claim the UFOs hovering over the other's sensitive military installations were secret devices which belonged to them. This pact was put in place in order to try to prevent an accidental nuclear exchange or war triggered by UFO intrusions and overflights.

Interestingly, Admiral Roscoe Hillenkoetter, the CIA's first director in 1947, was very vociferous about the dangers of accidental nuclear war triggered by UFO intrusions and overflights, either in the Soviet Union or America -- to the point he allowed NICAP Director Don Keyhoe to publicly quote him warning as such while he served on Keyhoe's NICAP Board of Governors. It's not known if the Admiral ever learned of the ultra-secret "non-aggression" pact between the Russians and Americans, signed in 1969, but he must have breathed a sigh of relief if he did.

In the end, the Condon Report, released in late 1969, was a classic example of CIA disinformation, for it not only dismissed UFOs but also called for the USAF to cease investigating them, no matter how concerned about UFO intrusions witnesses might be.

Thereafter, UFO intelligence became a matter for the CIA to secretly collect and analyze, even though in the fall of 1975 UFOs were buzzing USAF SAC B-52 bases and missile sites, hovering over and, in the Air Force's own words, "demonstrating a clear intent toward nuclear weapons."

Thereafter, UFO intelligence became a matter for the CIA to secretly collect and analyze, even though in the fall of 1975 UFOs were buzzing USAF SAC B-52 bases and missile sites, hovering over and, in the Air Force's own words, "demonstrating a clear intent toward nuclear weapons."

But Fred Durant, author of the CIA's Robertson Panel Report in 1953, perceived the greatest danger of UFO activity was the public and news media attention given to them. Durant had outlined a program of debunking and downplaying UFOs in order to prevent what he called "a morbid national psychology," which might foster "a harmful distrust of duly constituted authority."

The Condon Report sealed the lid on the coffin in which the truth about UFOs was buried. However, the UFO or flying saucer misinformation war between the U. S. and the USSR had been on--going since about 1950. The Soviets had suspected from the early days of saucer sightings in America that it was all a misinformation game designed to scare them into believing the U. S. had developed some sort of fantastic secret aerial weapon (which the USAF tried to reinforce by loudly proclaiming it was developing the AVRO disc** in the early 1950s). Conversely, in America some top scientific advisors to the Air Force [demurred] -- such as Dr. Anthony Mirarchi at the Air Force Geophysics Lab in Cambridge, Mass., which was receiving films of UFOs shot at White Sands Missile Range, N.M., shot by telescopic tracking cameras; Mararchi knew the UFOs surveilling White Sands were real but was convinced they were an amazing technological advancement by the Soviets.

The Soviets had gone so far as to stage an "accidental" exposure of a supposedly "Top Secret" schematic of a (bogus) Soviet-built flying saucer to an American spy in Moscow in 1950. Then in 1953 the Russians tried to reinforce this misinformation by planting a story in a Vienna, Austria, newspaper which claimed a flying saucer had crashed on Norway's Spitzbergen Island, and it had Russian markings on internal parts and matched almost exactly the bogus schematic exposed to an American spy in Moscow in 1950.

After Condon had buried the truth about UFOs with the study he headed and the report it generated, all designed to get the Air force off the hook and take UFO research underground where the CIA would answer to no-one, the public was only partly persuaded; but academia and politicians swallowed it like the proverbial hook, line, and sinker. Now, however, all manner of nonsense became part of the public forum on UFOs; but still, in spite of Fred Durant's gloomy predictions, America did not fall apart, the Soviet Union did.

The CIA's motto, borrowed from the Bible, says: "Know ye the truth, and the truth shall set ye free." Sadly, America has yet to be set free by learning the truth about UFOs being withheld by the CIA and other U. S. government agencies.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

* Note: The E.T. material studied and mentioned in this report has nothing whatsoever to do with the Roswell, N. M., incident of 1947, which was in truth the debris from the crash of a cluster of six balloons launched June 14, 1947, from White Sands as part of a Top Secret experiment to develop a recoverable sniffer of atomic tests in the Soviet Union. [LWB note: this being Zechel's bias favoring the contentious Mogul balloon theory for the Roswellian crash-retrieval/cover-up case.]

** The AVRO disc was just part of a U.S. Air Force attempt to misinform/mislead the Soviets, which started about 1953, when the USAF let a contract to Canada's A. V. Roe aviation company purportedly to build a flying saucer for only a few hundred thousand dollars. It was all a hoax designed to fool the Russians and the American public! [LWB note: The U. S. Army also had a hand in that multi-$m R&D contract. Indeed, one of the two "AVROcar's" prototypes became, back in the mid-sixties, an exhibit on the grounds of the U. S. Army Transportation Museum in Fort Eustis, Va.]

Monday, March 23, 2015

U. S. Army's 1966 UFO Confrontation at Grafenwoehr, Germany – Blow The Whistle!

U. S. Army's 1966 UFO Confrontation at Grafenwoehr, Germany – Blow The Whistle!

My Latest Posting on classifiedads.com


By Larry W. Bryant
The UFO Chronicles
3-15-15

     Recently, a former U. S. soldier has revealed his victimhood at the hands of a landed crew of UFOnauts whose technical prowess apparently exceeded that of any Earthling during the mid-1960's.

The crew's summer-night intrusion at the soldier's infantry-training camp in Grafenwoehr, Germany, apparently included abduction of one or more fellow infantrymen and the disabling of their M-113 personnel carrier. For more details of the soldier's experience, see his narrative here.

During the period in question, the soldier served as a truck driver
for A Company, 2nd Battalion, 21st Infantry, 24th Division.

If you or someone you know were among the participants/witnesses in
this case, and would like to offer the public some documented evidence
as to how and why the Army has suppressed public access to it, you,
and/or any other corroborative party, might prefer to submit your own
account -- in the form of a notarized deathbed confession. If so,
please share your information with me as follows:
Larry W. Bryant,
8415 Orcutt Avenue
Newport News, VA 23605-1415
phone: 757-251-2310;
e-mail: overtci@gmail.com

Whatever you choose to provide might serve as a catalyst for other
whistleblowers to come forward and tell all in the interest of greater
UFO freedom of information and accountability.

Thursday, May 29, 2014

UFO FOIA Compliance at CIA Remains Deficient/Deceptive

UFO FOIA Compliance at CIA Remains Deficient/Deceptive

By Larry W. Bryant
ufoview.posterous.com
5-27-14
"Science consists only one half in knowing what is known; the other half is never pretending to know what is not.” — Max Eastman in his 1933 lecture “Literature in an Age of Science,” published by the University of Michigan Press in an anthology titled The Writer and His Craft (Ann Arbor paperback, 1956, edited by Roy W. Cowden)
      With its characteristically glacial FOIA-request processing speed, the U. S. Central Intelligence Agency has completed its handling of my freedom-of-information request of Aug. 12, 2011 (see Items 2.155 and 2.157 of my blog ufoview.tumblr.com ).

By her letter to me of Dec. 12, 2013, CIA FOIA chief Michele Meeks pronounces Case No. F-2012-01584 closed — mainly by her enclosing a photocopy of a few UFO-related articles culled from the foreign press via the CIA-operated Open Source Center (formerly known as the Foreign Broadcast Information Service). These documents apparently originated from the intelligence-gathering pipeline of the U. S. Department of State (another outfit infamous for its pathetic compliance with FOIA requirements).

Here’s a synopsis of each article:
(1) An excerpt from the public affairs office of the U. S. Embassy in Amman, Jordan, titled “State PAO: Jordanian Media Highlights for 8-10 Jun 12.” The synopsis begins: “UFO may have been Russian missile test.” It goes on to explain, “After a spate of reports on social media of an unidentified flying object spotted near Jordan on Thursday night, June 7, 2012, Russian state-owned news agency Ria Novosti tweeted on Friday that it might have been a Russian ballistic missile test. Beat FM radio host Rob Stevens was among the first to report a sighting of the object just before 8:00 p.m. on Thursday, writing on Twitter that he had seen a UFO that ‘hovered, and then made a swirl and disappeared.’”

(2) An English-language item of June 10, 2012, from the Mehr News Agency in Tehran, Iran, titled “UFO Poses No Threat to Iran: Defense Minister.” The short report is prefaced by this notice from the OSC
staff: “[Computer-selected and disseminated without OSC editorial intervention.]” The report downplays the case in these words:
“Iranian Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi said on Sunday that the Islamic Republic of Iran air defense system has no problem and the UFO poses no threat to the country’s security. A mysterious light, which was seen over countries in the region including Syria, Israel, and Iran on Thursday night, has been confirmed by a number of sources, Yahoo News reported. There has been speculation that the strange sight might have been some sort of unidentified aircraft.”
3) An English account of a Persian-language report, titled “FYI — YouTube users Upload Video Showing Luminous Objects in Iran’s Sky, 07 Jun 12.” It notes that “The YouTube video-sharing website on 7 June
carried several clips showing luminous objects seen in the sky in Iran. On 7 June social media users posted several pictures of the luminous objects. A 1-minute and 19-second video posted by user
‘aydeniz2010’ on 7 June shows a luminous object moving above buildings in Tabriz, East Azarbayjian Province. The video was headlined in Persian ‘a luminous and strange object passing across the sky of
Tabriz and Iran.’:


(4) An English-language article (online) from the April 28, 2012, edition of the Lahore newspaper “Pakistan Today” — a piece titled “Pakistan: UFO Caused Bhoja Airplane Crash in Islamabad, Claims
Report.” It begins: “The Bhoja Air Boeing 737 crash in Islamabad on April 20 could have been caused by Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) sighting by the pilot, unconfirmed reports say.” The article notes
that a “Russian news report on the crash shows footage of three mysterious lights moving in formation, leading to speculation in the UFO community that blame for the tragic accident might lie with an extraterrestrial craft, reported the Daily Mail. The news report suggests that the pilot might have been distracted by the object and complained to the control tower at Islamabad Airport as he made his approach. The official reason, however, is that plane’s fuel tanks exploded mid-air during a heavy thunderstorm, killing all 127 people on board.”

(5) An article titled “200-kilo [about 500 pounds] Metal ‘UFO Fragment’ Falls from Sky in Siberia” — from the Iranian online English-language newspaper “Tehran IRNA,” datelined New Delhi, March
23, 2012, IRNA. This account merits full quoting, as follows:
"A giant ‘UFO fragment,’ resembling a silvery dome, has fallen from the sky near a remote village in Siberia. The U-shaped object is currently under inspection by Russian experts, after being covertly removed under cover of night from the possession of villagers who found it. After discovering the device on Sunday, locals from the village of Otradnesnky had managed to drag the ‘UFO fragment’ from the thick forest where it had fallen, ani [sic] reported quoting Russian media. They attached it onto a trailer and took it through the snow to their village, where local inspectors then examined it before alerting Moscow authorities. In an official statement, Sergey Bobrov, who found the object, agreed to keep it safe. But following their stealthy removal of the 200-kilogram metal fragment, police have it under close guard, on orders from unnamed authorities. The device has not had its provenance confirmed as of yet. However, the object does not come from a rocket or missile or be in any way associated with terrestrial space technology, it has been announced. ‘The object found is not related to space technology. A final conclusion can be made after a detailed study of the object by experts,’ the Telegraph quoted Roscosmos, the Russian space agency, as saying. Experts have also examined the object to determine whether it poses a hazard. ‘We measured the radiation level near and inside the object. We found no radiation here,’ Yuri Bormykov, who heads the rescue service department of the Kuybyshevsky district in the Novosibirsk region, said. Valery Vasiliev, the head of the Kuybyshevsky Department for Civil Defense and Emergency Situations, said that part of the fragment is made of ultra-strong titanium.”

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

FOIA Request for Alleged UFO / Alien Abduction Drags on for 3 1/2 Years!

Bookmark and Share

FOIA ReQuest for Alleged UFO / Alien Abduction Drags on for 3 1/2 Years!

Has the U. S. Defense Intelligence Agency Topped the List of Candidates for the Next FOIA Rosemary Award? (See Item 2.64) (Item 2.161)

By Larry W. Bryant
UFOview
11-10-13

     Why does it take 3.5 years for a major agency housed at Bolling Air Force Base, D.C., to process a freedom-of-information request? Though, in my case, that don’t-hold-yo’-breath waiting period may not have exceeded a few stalls incurred by some other FOIA requesters, it nevertheless stands as a monument to the Murphy’s Law of FOIA Processing: ”If we can avoid timeliness, we will do so.” This official, “kiss off, pal!” mind-set alone ought to qualify the offender for that dubious distinction created by the National Security Archive at the George Washington University (http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/) — the Rosemary Award, named after Pres. Nixon’s personal secretary (Rose Mary Woods), caretaker of his missing 18.5 minutes of (presumably) juicy audiotape during the Watergate scandal. As I present to you the text of the dismissal reply of Oct. 23, 2013, from the DIA FOIA office to my request of April 27, 2010, I want you to know my intention to FOIA-seek a copy of the entire case file on that request. If the Agency chooses to spend another 3.5 years ignoring my effort to help resolve the underlying whistleblower revelation, then I’m game to stay in the game. After all, what’s at stake here may well involve the Agency’s role in fraudulent concealment of a CRIME — i.e., the alleged UFO-alien abduction of a young federal employee in 1977, as documented and investigated via the DIA-managed "Operation Tango-Sierra.”

TEXT OF THE 23 OCT 13 “NO RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS 
… WERE FOUND” LETTER TO LWB:
Dear Mr. Bryant:

This responds to your request under the Freedom of Information Act, dated April 2010. Therein you requested information concerning Operation Tango-Sierra. I apologize for the delay in processing your request. DIA continues its efforts to eliminate the large backlog of pending FOIA requests.

Based on the information contained in your request, the Defense Intelligence Agency searched its systems of records for responsive documents. Despite a thorough search, no documents responsive to your request were found.

If you believe this Agency should have records responsive to your request, you may exercise your right to appeal this action. Your appeal should include justification to support additional search efforts and must be postmarked no later than 60 days after the date of this letter. Please refer to case number FOIA-0246-2010 and address your appeal to: Defense Intelligence Agency; ATTN: FAC2A1(FOIA); 200 MacDill Blvd.; Washington, D.C. 20340-5100.

Sincerely,

Alesia Y. Williams
Chief, Freedom of Information Staff

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Whither UFO-Alien-Abduction Research?

Bookmark and Share


By Larry W. Bryant
UFOview
11-8-13

      Note: If there be anything essential to one’s becoming a seasoned UFOlogist, it’s that (s)he ought not to relegate the UFO-alien-abduction experience to a marginalized status of inquiry, analysis, and tracking.–LWB

Indeed, it comforts me to see seasoned UFOlogist Billy Booth’s blog "UFO Casebook" cataloging accounts of the Ultimate Close Encounter — e.g., the case summarized at Alien Abduction Experience of Carolyn Z. This first-person narrative can serve as a primer for those just entering the ranks of UFOlogical scholarship; it also offers veteran abductionologists a mini-refresher course in their specialty. Its prose traces an Alabama mother’s frustrative coping with abduction encounters that have included some of her children.

COPING … that word was uppermost in my mind when I created, on Nov. 7, 2013, an online petition titled “Bring Justice for Victims of UFO-Alien Abduction!” at tinyurl.com/m7rkcue. During the crafting of this petition (now hosted by the web site of moveon.org), I was asked by the formatting instructions: ”Why are you starting this petition?” My answer: ”This petition aims to empower the citizenry’s quest for official answers to the worldwide problem of UFO-alien abduction. It thereby can help us mitigate (and cope with) the threat to public safety posed by this criminality.”

The petition’s text concludes by referring to the latest installment of my series of UFO-cover-up-whistleblower solicitation ads, now posted at www.classifiedads.com under the title “Blow the Whistle on the Government Cover-up of the UFO-Alien Abduction Experience!”. When I added my own signature to the petition, I supplemented it with this comment: ”UFO-alien abductees who’ve yet to put summaries of their accounts on public record might find this comments block suitable for their doing so now — and thus act as a force multiplier for others to come forward as well.”

Friday, October 18, 2013

What Does the NSA Know about The UFO-Cover-up Whistleblowership?

Bookmark and Share

What Does the NSA Know about The UFO-Cover-up Whistleblowership?

What Does the NSA Know (and When/How Did It Know It) about UFO-Cover-up Whistleblowership? (Item 2.159)

By Larry W. Bryant
UFOview
10-17-13

     When veteran UFO researcher Robert L. Hastings acted on his hunch that someone in the inner sanctum of the U. S. National Security Agency has been intercepting and processing some of his electronic communications with certain UFO-cover-up whistleblowers, he in no way expected to receive a prompt reply to his U. S. Privacy Act request of July 26, 2013, much less a reply declaring, e.g., “Hey, guy!

Enclosed is a photocopy of the entire NSA dossier on your activities/associations/motivations — which is cheerfully furnished to you free of any redactions or other encumbrances; we appreciate this opportunity to encourage your further efforts at exposing and ending the worldwide cover-up of the UFO-E.T. experience.” Well, Hastings’s expectation remains intact. His receipt of an Aug. 20, 2013, three-page, form-letterese kiss-off reply from NSA headquarters’s freedom-of-information chief Pamela N. Phillips confirms the Agency’s bunkerlike mind-set against any citizen curious to learn what records are being accumulated (and why), therein, about his/her First Amendment/Fourth Amendment-protected speech. Ms. Phillips’s summary denial of Hastings’s request impermissibly relies not upon certain exemptions within the Privacy Act but upon several FOIA exemptions (including the one pertaining to exposure of intelligence-gathering methods and sources).

As you ponder Hastings’s appeal letter of Oct. 15, 2013 (quoted below), ask yourself this question: where is the Ultimate UFO-cover-up Whistleblower, and when will (s)he blow the whistle so loudly as to crumble the walls of UFO secrecy throughout the intelligence community? Remember: Leaked evidence fuels the FOIA/PA reactor.

TEXT OF MR. HASTINGS’S APPEAL LETTER (15 Oct 13)
TO: NSA/CSS FOIA Appeal Authority (DJ4)
U. S. National Security Agency
9800 Savage Road
Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755


FROM: Robert L. Hastings
P. O. Box 62
Villa Grove, CO 81155


DATE: October 15, 2013


1. Reference: Your employee Pamela N. Phillips’s Aug. 20, 2013, letter to me by which she denies me access to any and all NSA-accumulated records sought by my PRIVACY Act request of July 26,
2013.

2. Ms. Phillips’s denial unjustifiably invokes FOIA-disclosure exemptions inapplicable to the provisions of the U. S. Privacy Act (except as applied to the CIA) — especially as applied to any official surveillance of my First Amendment-protected activity and to the disadvantage of UFO-cover-up whistleblowers. Her choosing to process my PA request as a FOIA request thus becomes a red herring to divert my exercise of all my PA rights (including the right to amend any incorrect material affecting my privacy interests). Her miscalculation not only raises questions of unsavory conduct; it also calls forth the history of the Watergate cover-up, in which culpable officials indulged in fraudulent concealment of their wrongdoing.

3. Ms. Phillips’s denial abets the NSA’s fraudulent concealment by wantonly nullifying the Privacy Act’s provisions that help protect me and my current and future whistleblower sources from unwarranted
invasion of privacy by any federal communications-surveillance program. Blowing the whistle on any federal cover-up of UFO reality is no crime; rather, it’s a public service and demands our freedom from official interference by government entities under the guise of antiterrorism or anti-espionage. No U. S. statute trumps our right to be let alone in our pursuit of official UFO truth and accountability. Indeed, the Privacy Act promotes and protects that right. Hence, Ms. Phillips’s denial of my PA request impedes my current/future cultivation of UFO-cover-up whistleblowership, infringes upon my privacy interests, and makes a mockery of your compliance with the spirit and letter of the Privacy Act.

4. I therefore ask that you reverse Ms. Phillips’s denial by granting this appeal as soon as possible; please direct her to conduct a thorough PA records search of all NSA systems of records open to access via such personal identifiers as name, Social Security number, e-address, telephone number, etc. — starting with (a) NSA Operations files, and (b) NSA Office of Inspector General Investigation and
Complaint files.

5. Your granting this appeal can help restore public trust in the integrity and accountability of your agency.

ROBERT L. HASTINGS

Author of UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites
LARRY W. BRYANT, a resident of Newport News, Va., focuses his research and writing efforts on national-security affairs (including information-access matters and First Amendment jurisprudence). If you Google-ize his name (even were you to write it as: larrywbryant), you'll find enough background information to satisfy almost anyone's curiosity about his activities, associations, and achievements.

Monday, September 03, 2012

UFO FOIA Flash! CIA Opts for Compliance over Resistance


Bookmark and Share


By Larry W. Bryant
ufoview.posterous.com
6-21-12
     Champions of the public's right to know what the U. S. intelligence community has been up to UFOlogically can take heart in something positive (for a change) exuding from the arcane records-management catacombs of the U. S. Central Intelligence Agency.

This heartening development of June 15, 2012, arrived in my USPS mailbox via a letter from CIA FOIA chief Michele Meeks, enclosing some 76 pages of "open source" documentation from the Agency's Foreign Broadcast Information Service. The "responsive" pages comprise nine documents created during the period May 1, 2011, through Aug. 12, 2011.

Ms. Meeks couldn't resist chiding me for daring to utilize a modern medium of communication, one supported by taxpayers' funds: e-mail. "With respect to your concern about not receiving a response to your original request and follow-up email dated 29 September 2011, we currently do not receive correspondence over the Internet," she pronounces. (Her statement has a disingenuous ring, indeed, inasmuch as certain CIA personnel have been known to exchange e-messages with certain staff members of the U. S. Congress. Does the Agency maintain any regulation prohibiting its FOIA workforce from answering e-mail queries from us lowly taxpayers?)

Anyhow, Meeks's letter does offer us another positive tidbit: "During our searches, we located additional material not originated by the CIA. This material appears to be relevant to your request, and has been referred to the originating agency for review and direct response to you."

As I begin to peruse the (sanitized) contents of this package, I intend to keep you updated. Please check back occasionally to see what gems I've managed to glean from the contents. But get not thy hopes up -- for a thumb-through so far reveals mostly mundane newspaper clips.

Thursday, August 09, 2012

What Does the CIA Know and When Did It Know It about Roswell?


Bookmark and Share


By Larry W. Bryant
ufoview.posterous.com
7-25-12

Text of Ad By Larry W Bryant as Seen at www.classifiedads.com

     Some months ago, former U. S. astronaut Edgar Mitchell disclosed his "insider knowledge" (as confided in him by one or more confidential
sources) that the so-called "Roswell Incident" of July 1947 constitutes the military retrieval of a crash-landed alien spacecraft. Now, ex-executive from the U. S. Central Intelligence Agency Charles"Chase" Brandon (www.chasebrandon.com) has announced his own encounter with this, the Deepest Secret.

According to his recent revelation during the syndicated "Coast-to-Coast AM" radio show hosted by George Noory, Brandon had been inside a vaulted area of the Agency when he noticed a box of records titled "Roswell." His inspection of the contents revealed such detail as photographs and references to cadavers. Thus far, he has been limiting his public account to those details.

If you, or someone you know, possess documented, verifiable evidence corroborating Brandon's discovery, you might qualify for the Roswell Whistleblower Award of $1,000 now being offered by me as a public service in supporting our fellow citizens' stakeholdership in learning the entire contents of that CIA files box. Be assured that your submitted evidence would be shared with one or more pertinent congressional committees empowered to subpoena relevant testimony from such witnesses as Brandon and from other former/current CIA personnel.

No CIA official has the right to lie to the public about any Roswellian truth; such deception invites whistleblower intervention at the highest level of the CIA hierarchy. Now is the time to join Mitchell and Brandon in their historic journey to help set the record straight. You may begin by contacting me at:
Larry W. Bryant,
8415 Orcutt Avenue
Newport News, VA 23605-1415
Phone: 757-251-2310;
e-mail: overtci@cox.net
See full text of my freedom-of-information (FOIA) request to the Agency as regards the title of this ad below:

TO: Ms. Michele Meeks
FOIA Coordinator
U. S. Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, DC 20505

FROM: Larry W. Bryant
8415 Orcutt Avenue
Newport News, VA 23605-1415

DATE: July 26, 2012
1. Reference: My classified advertisement posted at www.classifiedads.com, the text of which is printed above.

2. This freedom-of-information request seeks a photocopy of all your agency's records comprising the content of the CIA files box, labeled "Roswell," as witnessed by former CIA executive Charles "Chase" Brandon during one of his official visits to a vaulted area of the Agency -- an area that, he says, houses the Agency's "historical intelligence collection." If the sought-for records have been destroyed or transferred to another agency's custody, please send me a photocopy of all CIA records documenting that disposition.

3. Please note that this FOIA request serves not as a generic UFO-info request but as an investigatory probe into the extraterrestrial nature of the retrieved Roswell materiel and into the aftermath of the incident's official analysis, exploitation, and subsequent cover-up.

4. I submit this request as a representative of the news media (principally as a columnist for the newsstand periodical UFO Magazine) -- a requester status that affords me preferential waiver of all records-search/review fees incident to your fulfillment of this request.

5. By USPS mail, I'm sending to you a signed printout of this e-formatted letter.

Saturday, November 12, 2011

FOIA Request to U. S. Naval Air Station Pensacola re the Anti-UFO Attack of 23 Oct 11

Bookmark and Share


By Larry Bryant
ufoview.posterous.com
11-6-11
TO: Freedom-of-Information Coordinator
U. S. Naval Air Station Pensacola
190 Radford Blvd.
Pensacola, FL 32508-5217

FROM: Larry W. Bryant
3518 Martha Custis Drive
Alexandria, VA 22302

DATE: November 6, 201
1. Reference: My classified advertisement now posted upon the web site of ClassifiedAds.com, the text of which is printed below.

2. This freedom-of-information request seeks a copy of any and all NASP-generated and NASP-received records pertaining to the following two phases of NASP-related activity:

PHASE A: The anti-UFO aerial attack of October 23, 2011, as described in Reference 1 -- said records to include a full transcript of the fighter pilots' communications during and after the incident. all audio/video recordings of post-incident debriefings of the pilots; all gun-camera photography and radar-tracking data secured from the intercepting fighters; mortician reports on any and all occupants of the downed UFO; all documentary evidence assembled and submitted under provisions of Joint Army-Navy-Air Publication (JANAP) 146 (re formal reporting of "vital intelligence sightings"); pilots' logs of the ammunition expended during the shoot-down; photographic evidence of any damage to the fighters; after-action reports submitted to higher headquarters; public-affairs guidance on the processing of media inquiries about the incident; and congressional inquiries into the events and principals leading up to the incident's inception and outcome.

PHASE B: All such records (described above) as pertain to all other NASP-involved interceptions/attacks occurring during the period November 6, 2010, through November 6, 2011.

3. As you proceed with the processing of this request, I ask that you comply fully with the following two FOIA requirements:

a. Within 20 working days of your receipt of this letter, assign to this request a case file/tracking number and notify me, in writing, of that action.

b. Provide me the approximate date on which you expect to fulfill my request for all responsive records.

4. Please acknowledge my FOIA-requester status as a representative of the news media (RNM) by waiving all records-search/review fees incident to your fulfilling this request; and please note my willingness to pay only for your reasonable document-duplication costs beyond the first 100 responsive pages. Ample evidence of my RNM status appears within my web log at ufoview.posterous.com.

5. By USPS mail, I'm sending to you a signed printout of this e-formatted letter.
LARRY W. BRYANT
Columnist for UFO Magazine

Copies furnished to:

Editor, UFO Magazine
Chief of Staff, U. S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

TEXT OF LWB's ADVERTISEMENT AT www.classifiedads.com/announcements-ad7827084.htm


== Blow the Whistle on the U. S. Navy's Downing of a UFO over the Gulf of Mexico! ==

Information recently leaked to the UFO-research community reveals that, in the night of Oct. 23, 2011, one or more jet fighters from Florida's Naval Air Station Pensacola directed their gunfire at a speedy UFO in the sky above the Gulf of Mexico. The result: the pursued UFO burst into flames and tumbled into the sea. Why did this incident occur, who gave the order to open fire, where is the debris from the UFO's impact, and what do official records say about the encounter?

To get some answers, I'm sending to the station a freedom-of-information request for access to all NASP records pertaining to this historic event. See the request's text now posted as Item 2.135 upon my web log at ufoview.posterous.com.

In the meantime, if you (or someone you know) can shed additional, authoritative light upon what happened (and why) during that aerial skirmish, you may qualify for a $1,000 reward for such whistleblower-derived evidence (as to be adjudged by a panel of UFO-research specialists). Contact Larry W. Bryant, 3518 Martha Custis Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302; phone: 703-931-3341; e-mail: overtci@cavtel.net. Be assured that whatever information you might choose to offer would be welcomed by one or more congressional oversight committees.

For periodic updates on this whistleblower-solicitation campaign, you may wish to subscribe for my free online newsletter at tinyletter.com/ufoview-updates.

Thursday, September 22, 2011

The F.B.I.'s Inadvertent Incentive to Press On


Bookmark and Share


By Larry W. Bryant
ufoview.posterous.com
9-20-11

Larry Bryant     My first FOIA request to the U. S. Federal Bureau of Investigation occurred shortly after the Act's advent as a public tool for inquiry and accountability. Here's how I came to exercise my right to know where - when - how - why the Bureau had begun to compile its dossier on my early exercise of First Amendment rights:
Back in the early 1960s, when I was a federal employee (but totally
unrelated to that employment), I embarked on a local UFOtruth campaign to determine how (and why) selected law-enforcement agencies in southeast Virginia were processing citizens' reports of UFO encounters. The campaign consisted of a series of research queries sent via typed postcards . Apparently, one or more of the contacted chiefs of police had felt intimidated by the queries to the point of notifying the Bureau. Soon enough, an agent from the F.B.I. field office in Norfolk, Va., visited me -- not at my home but at my employer's office.

During the ensuing interview, I proceeded to justify my existence by explaining my interest in UFO research aimed to support the work of such public-interest groups as the now-defunct, Washington, D.C.-based National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena. For his part, the agent explained that he was going to compose a memorandum for the F.B.I. files.

Some weeks later, I sent a letter to F.B.I. director J. Edgar Hoover, asking that he send me a copy of that memo. In his reply letter, he declined, saying that all F.B.I. files are deemed "confidential." So I waited (but continued, by the way, to pursue my UFO research/writing).
Upon the FOIA's birth, I fired off a renewed request that I be provided a copy of whatever records the Bureau had chosen to keep on my activities. This time, they complied. The memo now remains a monument to the Bureau's, the CIA's, the Office of Naval Intelligence's, and the Army Intelligence and Security Command's intrusive compilation of dossiers on selected UFOlogists during a
protracted era of government marginalization of both the work and the collective persona of these volunteer researchers. These agencies' insecurity over how close we may have been getting to dispelling the Deepest Secret has fueled my persistent probing ever since the 1960s.

Thursday, April 07, 2011

FOIA Request [For UFO Reports] to the U. S. National Reconnaissance Office

NRO Logo



TO:
Director
U. S. National Reconnaissance Office
ATTN: MS&O Information Access and Release Team
14675 Lee Road
Chantilly, VA 20151-1715
FROM:
Larry W. Bryant
3518 Martha Custis Drive
Alexandria, VA 22302
DATE: March 23, 2011

1. Reference: my classified advertisement posted here - the text of which is printed below.

2. This FOIA request, which I submit as a representative of the news media (RNM), derives from a whistleblower's account of having witnessed, in 1975, the content of certain U. S. State Department telexes while on duty at the U. S. embassy in Canberra, Australia. That content dealt with U. S. spy satellites' experiencing interference from "hostile aerial craft," as detected by operations at the Tidbinbilla Tracking Range.

3. Accordingly, I hereby request that you send me a photocopy of the following records:

(a) Any and all NRO-produced reports of spy-satellite interference from alien spacecraft (aka "hostile aerial craft" and UFO-E.T. approaches).

(b) Incident/contact reports in this intelligence category (whether the data be radar-transmitted, video-captured, telemetered , or otherwise acquired via imagery techniques) compiled and analyzed during the period January 1, 2009, through March 23, 2011.

(c) Technical-intelligence-collection requirements/guidelines by which NRO personnel currently operate in detecting and recording contact with these craft.

(d) Inquiries and correspondence from any and all congressional personnel involved in investigating the NRO role in official reaction to space-borne detection/tracking/recording of UFO-E.T. encounters.

4. Please note that provisions of the U. S. Freedom of Information Act (as amended by the Open Records Act of 2007) entitle me to automatic waiver of all records-search fees incident to your fulfilling this request.

5. By USPS mail, I'm sending to you a signed printout of this e-formatted letter.

LARRY W. BRYANT