Showing posts with label Kirsten Gillibrand. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kirsten Gillibrand. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 25, 2023

SCU Responds To Senate Public Hearing On UFOs - UAP

Logo for The Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies


SCU commends the US Senate Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities on UAP hearing and applauds the first public release of some factual data on reported UAP shapes, altitudes, hotspots, and other characteristics; requests data on anomalous kinematics to support unclassified scientific research of UAP.

     The Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (SCU), a data-driven organization of scientists, engineers, academics, and research professionals dedicated to conducting and supporting open
scientific research into unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), released the following announcement:

The SCU commends Senators Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), and Joni Ernst (R-IA) of the US Senate Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities (SASCSETC), and Dr. Kirkpatrick, Director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), on their informative public hearing on UAP held April 19, 2023.

The hearing described a rigorous approach toward collecting and resolving military UAP reports. It also contained the first public release by the US government of a set of factual data on shapes, altitudes, and hotspots, as well as radar, radio, and thermal IR characteristics, of UAP reported between 1996-2023. Encouragingly, the listed attributes from these classified military reports are consistent with typical characteristics gleaned from large, non-classified databases of UAP witness reports.

SCU’s subject matter experts see Dr. Kirkpatrick and his team taking the proper steps in three essential areas of the endeavor: careful UAP case triage methods, the skillful use of both intelligence and scientific teams, and technically detailed case study, as presented in the video analysis during the open hearing. This approach is critical to resolving UAP reports into the categories of insufficient data, prosaic phenomena, potential adversary craft, and the truly unknown.

As a research priority, SCU urges AARO to release information on the characteristics of objects that reflect a kinematic capability beyond currently known technologies. Such incidents have been reported repeatedly over the last 70 years; the 2004 Nimitz incident is only a recent example. These are a critical class of UAP reports that will help academic researchers to seek, and reasonably expect to receive, funding for their unclassified work through NSF, NASA, DoD, or even AARO.

SCU wishes to thank every Member of Congress who supported the funding of AARO. We agree with the US government that UAP is an area of scientific study critical for the security of our nation and world. We look forward to the information AARO will be sharing with the public in the future.

Thursday, April 06, 2023

More Funding for Pentagon UFO Office Requested By Congress

Graphic By www.theufochronicles.com representing AARO

“Our national security efforts rely on aerial supremacy and these phenomena present a challenge to our dominance over the air,” Gillibrand said in a statement ....

     Lawmakers have called to increase funding for the Pentagon’s unidentified aerial phenomena [UAP]research office following the release of the Biden administration’s budget request.

During a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) questioned senior Pentagon officials, including Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, about the budget request for the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office. Questions from Gillibrand, who chairs the Armed Services Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities, focused on why the office was underfunded for the second year in a row.

Monday, December 27, 2021

Single Video Accomplished What 70 Years of Modern UFO Documentation Had Not

Single Video Accomplished What 70 Years of Modern UFO Documentation Had Not

Been a long time comin'
Clinking a glass to today’s milestone of bipartisanship: The appearance of democracy getting a break after nearly four generations of military intelligence resistance to opening the books on UFOs is better than no appearance at all.
     The moments that shape who and what we’ve become can take years to assume full stature, but sometimes the details linger, waiting for proportion to catch up. My backyard neighbor, eyes fixed on the catastrophe blossoming across the immediate sky, placing the microphone to the cancer hole in his throat and issuing a pronouncement filtered through an electronic and otherworldly monotone: “I think the space shuttle just blew up.” A newborn daughter’s first screech and the snip of the umbilical scissors in the launch of a fresh adventure. The slant
By Billy Cox
lifeinjonestown
12-15-21
of the late afternoon light through the kitchen window when Mom calls from 650 miles away to say her diagnosis is terminal.

What I remember: It was clear-blue cool the day the Earth stood still, arid, low 70s, invigorating for Florida. The December sun drew the critters to the surface at the state park down the road. A couple of gopher tortoises, an armadillo, the biggest glass lizard in memory, maybe two feet long, or more. Following the five-mile hike came a long exhale on the 10-speed home; by time I shook the sand off everything and hit the laptop, it was early afternoon.

The breaking news headlines were consumed by tiresome disaster porn, floods in Chile, California on fire, stalemate in Afghanistan, etc. The usual reruns. Men behaving badly. #MeToo updates. The Detroit Lions coming up in a few … ugh. Maybe a movie? But then. Wait a minute. The New York Times. Whoawhoawhoa. Stop.

“WASHINGTON – In the $600 billion annual Defense Department budgets, the $22 million spent on the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program was almost impossible to find …”

UFOs — the white whale. At last. Lead image above the lead graph: official U.S. Navy gun-cam footage, alternating from television to infrared modes, F-18 pilot exchanges recorded in pursuit. “There’s a whole fleet of ‘em, look on the AESA.” “My gosh!” “They’re all going against the wind, the wind’s 120 knots to the west … Look at that thing, dude …” “Look at that thing!” “It’s rotating.”

And within the space of 30 seconds, a single video packed with digital metadata accomplished what 70 years of “modern” UFO documentation had not – confirmed that those of us who’d looked up and gaped at the incomprehensible weren’t crazy or hallucinating. Well, many of us. And the Pentagon – those publicly indifferent star-spangled uniforms who for generations thought it better to let us doubt the sanity of our own curiosity than to toss us a bone – turns out those sneaky guys and gals had a few secrets of their own.

I raced through the article, the names, the acronyms, the numbers, the dates, the places, all of it pointing toward something I knew viscerally to be true. But I didn’t laugh out loud until I got to the sidebar, to the part where Navy pilots David Fravor and Jim Slaight emerged fearless in retirement. They described the aftermath of their 2004 encounter, in which a UFO shaped like a breath mint had run circles around their jet fighters.

“They were en route and closing in when the Princeton radioed again. Radar had again picked up the strange aircraft. ’Sir, you won’t believe this,’ the radio operator said, ‘but that thing is at your cap point.’ ‘We were at least 40 miles away, and in less than a minute, this thing was already at our cap point’ …”

Good god. This wasn’t just about propulsion, hardware and technology – this was about reality itself, demanding new definitions. But there was no lag time in this scoop’s impact; I knew right then and there, the world had changed. And I knew I had changed, too. Because this was personal, as the news no doubt was for countless other fellow Earthlings who had learned to table this very real conversation for some other time, some other place.

Now.

I went noodling around for more — and there, a second story, from Politico, not Alex Jones, independently corroborating details on the Pentagon’s clandestine dive into the The Great Taboo. Then another story. And another. And the minutes turned to hours, and the wire services and global newsies all piled on, some with the urgency of a terrorist bombing or a celebrity fashion disaster. Just as my parents had saved the paper from JFK’s blood-splattered limo dash out of Dealey Plaza, this was history, and I needed an old-school memento.

I headed out to the bookstore early Sunday morning, where the Times was sitting on the rack. Its top stories were more reruns, including two (2) analyses of Republican tax bills. A third threw a spotlight on how “reformer” Mohammed bin Salman had annexed Chateau Louis XIV outside Versailles for $300 million. Six bucks later, there it was, underplayed below the fold, but a headline on 1A real estate nevertheless: “Real U.F.O.s? Pentagon Unit Tried to Know.

So much has happened since then. So many moving parts and falling dominoes, enough to fill a book, too dense to tally here. But all those interlocking efforts have brought us an overdue payoff. Consequently, today, this day, is like none other in American history.

Just one day shy of the four years since the Times broke the AATIP story, Congress has passed and dispatched the National Defense Authorization Act spending bill to the Oval Office for a rubber stamp. Included in the mandate is an order for the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence to collaborate on getting a grip on the UFO challenge. The nerve center of this joint effort is a laughable acronym, AOIMSG, or the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group. But amid this most dangerously polarized Congress in living memory, a bipartisan show of lawmaker support isn’t laughing.

AOIMSG is commanded to be up and running within 180 days of President Biden’s signature, and to brief the heads of select congressional committees in classified settings twice a year. By the end of 2022, it will issue an unclassified report. The itemized areas of interest are broad. They include a presentation of UFO/UAP incidents involving nuclear assets, physiological harm suffered during such encounters, and “an update on any efforts underway on the ability to capture or exploit discovered unidentified aerial phenomena.”

The bill on Biden’s desk is flawed, of course. One the strongest parts of the original language — proposed by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) to include an advisory board of 25 civilian scientists — didn’t make the cut. And for now, AOIMSG will answer to the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence & Security, or OUSD(I&S). This is the bureaucracy that, according to Pentagon whistleblower Luis Elizondo and former USD(I&S) Chris Mellon, is unqualified to handle these chores and have actively resisted outsider scrutiny.

Whether this effort becomes the envisioned window into transparency on America’s darkest closet or just another cynical exercise in information control/image rehab remains to be seen. We’ll hash out some of those reservations in the near future. For now, until the brass begins to disappoint us, let’s just say well done, to the lawmakers who proved they actually are capable of working together, to the persistence of Elizondo and Mellon, to the journalists who’ve made this moment possible, and to everybody who got off their asses and actually contacted their public servants.

The only analogy that comes directly to mind is the bitter feuds that preceded the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty of 1963. In a world where radioactive fallout from WMD testing poisoned the food supplies of friend and foe alike, military-industrial complexes on both sides of the Iron Curtain pushed back against calls to take this insanity underground. Establishment heavyweights in the West, like Atomic Energy Commission chair Lewis Strauss, and hydrogen bomb architect Edward Teller, once argued the very fate of our nation hinged on the continuation of atmospheric atomic experiments.

Anyway … here’s hoping that today marks the beginning of the end of the Cold War’s final chapter, a line of demarcation where future generations will look upon our pathological insecurities and wonder, “What the hell was that all about?”

You may say I’m a dreamer. But …

Tuesday, December 21, 2021

UFOs Are Serious Business!

UFOs Are Serious Business

[...]


     Congress has never before enacted any statutes that deal explicitly with UFOs or Unidentified Aerial Phenomena. To the extent that various government agencies have dealt with UAP incidents, or sought to manage public concerns about UAP, they have done so under their general operating authorities as they interpret them. In recent years, the Senate Select Committee
By Douglas Dean Johnson
douglasjohnson.ghost.io
12-7-21
on Intelligence has prodded the Pentagon and Intelligence Community with language in committee reports, but enactment of sweeping statutory mandates will elevate the subject matter of UAP into an entirely new realm.

Wednesday, December 15, 2021

UFOs / UAP: We Don't Need No Stinking Science!

UFOs / UAP: We Don't Need No Stinking Science
SCIENCE, SCIENCE. WE DON'T NEED NO STINKING SCIENCE!

AND NOW HISTORY WE SURE DON'T NEED NO SMELLY HISTORY.




     Harsh words but they need to be said.

Hour Zero is now in 2004. Ufology was at one time supposed to be multidisciplinary. Not anymore. We have intelligence gurus and academics eschewing history. Way to go!

Read Larry Hancock's UNIDENTIFIED: The National Intelligence Problem of UFOs, he said the original government UFO Program was an intelligence failure. Second verse same as the first. We are looking at, according to the government, “144 aircraft
Jan Aldrich
By Jan Aldrich
The UFO Chronicles
12-14-21
sightings” and at the University of Wyoming there are about 3000 such reports. During the Vietnam War Projects Lethal Chaser and Have Fear were instrumented and nearly all unexplained. These incidents were not in Project Blue Book nor submitted to the Condon Committee.

French police Captain Dominque Weinstein's Aircraft/UFO Encounters catalog contained over 1200 historical entries. Oh, but Aerospace expert, James Oberg said there were some Soviet/Russian missile and satellite launches that were in the catalog apparently invalidating the whole work. Let's see, so all science is perfect from the very beginning. There is never a time when data needs to be sifted and mistakes and invalid items eliminated. Of course not. Pains were taken to eliminate duplications, errors, and conventional explanations; Oberg pointing out errors is prudent. Trying to say the whole effort was useless is not a valid proposition.

The French space agency CNE was able to use Weinstein's catalog to make some conclusions about UFOs.

Flight Safety: Weinstein also produced a catalog of about 600 cases on close approaches to aircraft, buzzings, pacings, crossing paths and near misses. Some of these incidents were observed by air traffic controllers, visually and or on radar and investigated by government experts. So will they not look back at these incidents? Flight Safety should not be examined prior to 2004?

Satellite detection: The first known possible satellite detection was is 1967 by government personnel and submitted to the Condon Committee but never acknowledged. Former DNI Ratcliffe also said there were satellite detections. Such detections were not acknowledged in the June 2021 report. Are these detections before 2004?

Historical Instrument Detections: Project Blue Book and post Project Blue Book records contain radar scope photographs and eferences exist for gun camera films. Moreover, Cape Canaveral launch detection records exist.

Some possible instrumentation sightings: The Condon Committee submitted 120 reports to the Allsky camera Prarie Meteor Network. There were some photographs at the same time as UFO incidents. None of these photos are mentioned in detail in the Condon Report. The NORAD computers store uncorrelated targets. Attempts to pay for these records to compare with UFO incidents has been requested under FOIA, but costs to UFO advocates proved prohibitive. If the government were to use these resources, to investigate historical incidents, there wouldn’t be, or shouldn’t be a cost to civilians. Although the Condon Committee members met with NORAD there were no records used by the Committee.

Brain Damage to Air Crews: This last category is purely anecdotal. Supposedly, some air Crews are showing brain symptoms similar to Havana Syndrome which would indicate a bad state actor involved. However, looking at history in WWII, a whole bomber crew was hospitalized with debilitating headaches after a UFO encounter; the case was investigated years afterwards by Dr. James McDonald. A decade later the pilot was involved with a UFO incident witnessed from the ground. He experienced the same severe headache. In any case, many people are still alive in regards to the aircraft crew cases, mentioned above. Here we could determine subjects for controlled medical investigations. If these rumors are true, do such cases start before 2004?

Recommendations:

1. Include air safety and control agencies in any UFO investigations.

2. Include DOE and all DOD nuclear and Special Weapons Agencies in data collections, including the Nuclear Regulatory Agency.

3. Have all government agencies disgorge and declassify all historical UFO data. (This would include agencies like federal police officers, guard forces, civilian and other law and regulatory agents. Included would be correctional facilities, fire watchers, fire fighters, Border Patrol and Custom Agents, etc. Finally, all scientific agencies, contractors, DHS and subordinate agencies must take part.

Sunday, December 12, 2021

Pentagon UFO Rapid Response Teams Ordered Up by Congress

Rapid Response Team


     Teams of Pentagon and intelligence community experts would rapidly respond to military UFO sightings and conduct field investigations under newly unveiled defense legislation set to pass Congress.
By Travis Tritten
Military.com
12-7-21

Lawmakers also want scientific and technical experts to analyze data about the objects, or what the military calls unidentified aerial phenomena, or UAP, as well as any recovered materials or medical effects, according to the text of the annual defense authorization bill released Tuesday.