Pages



Saturday, June 29, 2024

Nuke Plant Guards Report Hovering UFOs

Nuke Plant Guards Report Hovering UFOs - www.theufochronicles.com

"A dozen security officers at the Indian Point 3 nuclear plant spotted a large UFO on July 24, 1984 .... They said the UFO was 900 feet long and hovered over the plant for 15 minutes ..."



     Shotguns were drawn and the National Guard was notified, say some.

But officials of the New York Power Authority will not release details about what happened last summer at tbe Indian Point nuclear
By Jon Craig
Journal News
(Nyack, New York)
1-12-1985
power complex during the reported alptmg of an unidentifted flying object near the reactor.

A dozen security officers at the Indian Point 3 nuclear plant spotted a large UFO on July 24, 1984, according Philip Imbrogno, an astronomer with the Center for UFO Studies.

Imbrogno, of Greenwich, Conn., an investigator for the Evanston, Ill. centert said this week, "It was quite an incident and they were quite upset."

He said he interviewed six guards who contacted him about the sighting. They said the UFO was 900 feet long and hovered over the plant for 15 minutes, according to Imbrogno. There was a similar incident on June 14, he said.

Carl Patrick, a spokeman for NYPA, operator of Unit 3, confirmed the sightings but said, "It's a six month-old story."

Larry Rossbach, a resident inspector with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, recalled Friday that guards were discussing the incident when he reported to work the following day.

Said Rossbach, "I didn't see it (but) I remember some guys said they saw it. I accept them as reasonable people."

One security officer, who requested anonymity, said the object was 100 feet long, looked like helicopters in V-formation. made some noise and hovered 300 yards above the plant. He said guards "broke out the shotguns."

No comments :

Post a Comment

Dear Contributor,

Your comments are greatly appreciated, and coveted; however, blatant mis-use of this site's bandwidth will not be tolerated (e.g., SPAM etc).

Additionally, healthy debate is invited; however, ad hominem and or vitriolic attacks will not be published, nor will "anonymous" criticisms. Please keep your arguments "to the issues" and present them with civility and proper decorum. -FW