 | By Roger Marsh OpenMinds.tv 1-4-16 |
A California witness at Alameda County reported watching and photographing two unknown objects hovering low over railroad tracks, according to testimony in Case 73496 from the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) witness reporting database.
The witness was on his way to pickup a girlfriend from work about 6 p.m. on Tuesday, December 29, 2015, when the objects were first seen.
“As I approached her work I was stopped due to an Amtrak train passing by, but as I approached the crossing (one block away) I noticed an object moving very quickly with a rapidly flashing light that caught my attention.”
The witness first thought he was observing a drone.
“But as I got closer and came to a stop I could see that it was rather large – four feet or so – and much too fast and erratic in its flight to be any drone easily available for the public. Then as the train started to pass, another object, similar in flight characteristics but different in design appeared– but this one had appendages.”
The two objects seemed to be aware of each other.
“They seemed to interact almost playfully hovering and almost touching while the train passed.”
The witness was able to take several photos at this time.
“As the train was gone a few minutes, they each shot off in different directions rather quickly and abruptly.”
The witness pulled into a parking lot about one block away to wait for his girlfriend.
“I noticed one of the objects hovering about 100+feet in the air near me with a solid light.” [...]
Continue Reading ►
See Also:
Further Analysis of Train/UFO Collision Case
Did This Train Collide With a UFO?
Dr. Lincoln La Paz Unknowingly Handles a Chunk of 'Solid Metallic Uranium' Previously Thought To Be A Meteorite
REPORT YOUR UFO EXPERIENCE
 |
No comments :
Post a Comment
Dear Contributor,
Your comments are greatly appreciated, and coveted; however, blatant mis-use of this site's bandwidth will not be tolerated (e.g., SPAM etc).
Additionally, healthy debate is invited; however, ad hominem and or vitriolic attacks will not be published, nor will "anonymous" criticisms. Please keep your arguments "to the issues" and present them with civility and proper decorum. -FW