| Tweet |  |
 |
| These three objects were videotaped on the same night, Oct. 6. The object at left was over Hong Kong, and the other two were videotaped by the same person in San Antonio. | Credit: Smileboyhk / SAUFOTX / YouTube / Huffington Post |
 | By Lee Speigel The Huffington Post 10-14-13 |
New UFO videos are showing up on YouTube daily, with descriptions that make them seem truly out of this world -- but are they really?
Take the case of what appeared to be a diamond-shaped object that allegedly hovered over Hong Kong on the nights of Oct. 5 and 6.
Ex-cable TV reporter, Wu Xiaodong Yi, claims to have captured a UFO over Hong Kong on Oct. 5, but his cell phone quality was so low that he waited until the next night with a better video camera, hoping the object would come back, according to a Chinese sales company, ePrice.com.hk.
As luck would have it, the UFO did show up again the following evening.
Here's the Hong Kong UFO, as posted by Smileboyhk:
Open Minds.tv uncovered the translated ePrice coverage of this "event," noting how the diamond-shape appearance of the UFO may have been caused by an effect of the camera aperture as it moved in and out of focus.
Huffington Post showed the video to photo and video analyst Marc Dantonio.
"The first thing I noticed was the changing colors and flickering of the object," Dantonio told HuffPost in an email.
"The fact that it was there the next night around the same time strongly indicates that this was a likely mistaken astronomical object. I consulted software, and when I looked at Hong Kong, noted that my suspicions were true -- Jupiter was visible over Hong Kong that night. Jupiter is often mistaken for a UFO." . . .
Continue Reading . . .
See Also:
UFO Recorded On Video Over Hong Kong
UFO Videotaped Over China
"Alien Encounters, UFO Sightings or Moon Walking — Indians Are The Most Adventurous When It Comes To Extraterrestrial Matters"
UFOlogy: Science and the Flying Saucers
SHARE YOUR UFO EXPERIENCE
 |
No comments :
Post a Comment
Dear Contributor,
Your comments are greatly appreciated, and coveted; however, blatant mis-use of this site's bandwidth will not be tolerated (e.g., SPAM etc).
Additionally, healthy debate is invited; however, ad hominem and or vitriolic attacks will not be published, nor will "anonymous" criticisms. Please keep your arguments "to the issues" and present them with civility and proper decorum. -FW