.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
+2.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
A Jennings UFO sequel?
By Rich Reynolds
RRRGroup
3-4-05
Conversations with our local ABC affiliate [WPTA-TV] here in Fort Wayne . the General Manager particularly, indicates that there is a distinct possibility that ABC and Jennings might consider a follow-up to its UFO Special because it did rather well in the Nielsen ratings (coming in second, bested only by two reality powerhouses: Survivor and The Apprentice).
Moreover, the airing brought so much feedback and controversy that ABC seems inclined to consider another foray into the topic.
(We sent off a note to Mr. Jennings, with whom we’ve communicated personally in the past, and if we get a reply, with any inkling of a “sequel,” we’ll make it known surely.)
RRRGroup
3-4-05
Conversations with our local ABC affiliate [WPTA-TV] here in Fort Wayne . the General Manager particularly, indicates that there is a distinct possibility that ABC and Jennings might consider a follow-up to its UFO Special because it did rather well in the Nielsen ratings (coming in second, bested only by two reality powerhouses: Survivor and The Apprentice).
Moreover, the airing brought so much feedback and controversy that ABC seems inclined to consider another foray into the topic.
(We sent off a note to Mr. Jennings, with whom we’ve communicated personally in the past, and if we get a reply, with any inkling of a “sequel,” we’ll make it known surely.)
posted by THE UFO CHRONICLES at 9:52 AM
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg
)
.jpg
)
.jpg
)
.jpg
)
.jpg
)
.jpg
)
.jpg
)
.jpg
)
.jpg
)
.jpg
)
.jpg
)
.jpg
)
.jpg
)
.jpg
)
.jpg)
.jpg
)
.jpg
)
.jpg
)
.jpg)
.jpg'alt=)
2 Comments:
Frank:
As I said to Rich, if Jennings is looking for a director, he should cast his eyes north to his home country - I'm definitely available :)
Best regards,
Paul Kimball
Paul,
Based on his first exposé, methinks you would be "over qualified."
Frank
Post a Comment
Dear Contributor,
Your comments are greatly appreciated, and coveted; however, blatant mis-use of this site's bandwidth will not be tolerated (e.g., SPAM etc).
Additionally, healthy debate is invited; however, ad hominem and or vitriolic attacks will not be published. Please keep your arguments "to the issues" and present them with civility and proper decorum-FW