Monday, December 16, 2013

Russian 1969 Roswell Badly Faked | VIDEO

Bookmark and Share

Russian 1969 Roswell Badly Faked

By Henry Paterson

     . . . For a start, I would question why the examiner is using an exact o-knife for this autopsy in place of a scalpel? Then I wonder why the skin separates so easily from the flesh beneath, AND holds the shape of the skeletal structure even when separated. There are surgical tools for holding back the skin when they body cavity is open, even for such plastic looking skin, and what is used in the video is not them. No one is stopping to take still photographs at each stage of this “autopsy” of a supposed alien. The examiner continually puts their hand in the way of seeing what they are actually doing as they remove internal organs that to all appearances have no attachment to any part of the body. The rib cage should be cut and spread open to gain access to what in a human would be heart and lungs rather than blindly poking in there with a pair of bent nose pliers (doing who knows what amount of damage to the organs beneath) in place of any proper surgical tool.

All in all, someone went to a lot of trouble to get a lot of people and costumes for this production. It is a pity they did not pay the same attention to detail to continuity, or accuracy. . . .

1 comment :

  1. I understand your arguments here. But let me play the devils advocate for a minute.
    1: What kind of medical training esp from 1969 Russia do you have in tools used in that period?
    2: Most of all when was the last time you performed an autopsy on an extraterrestrial life form? How would you know how their flesh looks and how it delegates from bone?
    In conclusion; pls next time you try to debunk a video do it a little more scientific. State the tools that would be used, pics help. And describe in detail how a prop like this could be made. Among other things.


Dear Contributor,

Your comments are greatly appreciated, and coveted; however, blatant mis-use of this site's bandwidth will not be tolerated (e.g., SPAM etc).

Additionally, healthy debate is invited; however, ad hominem and or vitriolic attacks will not be published, nor will "anonymous" criticisms. Please keep your arguments "to the issues" and present them with civility and proper decorum. -FW


Mutual UFO Network Logo