Wednesday, May 08, 2013

A Truth Embargo? Researchers Discuss Academic and Scientific Proof of Flying Object Sightings | UFO NEWS

Bookmark and Share

Ending The Truth Embargo

By Nisa Islam Muhammad

     WASHINGTON, DC ( - In the realm of unusual revelations, Jason Collins can admit that he’s gay and receive support from around the country. But tell someone you’ve seen a UFO and you will be welcomed into an exclusive group of citizens and professionals world wide that have experienced dismissive ridicule as they encounter a truth embargo.

“One of the striking things about UFOs is the discrepancy between the astonishing sightings on the one hand and the lack of responsible treatment of it by major media. Our academic and scientific institutions and our political system,” testified Researcher Richard Dolan May 3, before the Citizen Hearing on Disclosure of an extraterrestrial presence engaging the human race (CHD) at the National Press Club April 29-May 3.

“This (is) a shame because there is very good research being done every day. Many of those researchers have been here this week. Others are out there, too, such as the National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena (NARCAP), which collects and analyzes encounters that the aviation industry has with unknown objects.”

He added, “None of them get any love from the America’s dumdum media, which prefers to lump the whole subject into a big tin foil hate and instead write about the escapades of Kim Kardashian.”

Testimony at the hearing included forty researchers and military/agency witnesses before former members of Congress including Congressmen Roscoe Bartlett, Merrill Cook and Congresswomen Lynn Wolsey, and Darlene Hooley. The CHD attempted to accomplish what they felt Congress has failed to do for forty-five years—seek out the facts surrounding the most important issue of this or any other time. . . .

No comments :

Post a Comment

Dear Contributor,

Your comments are greatly appreciated, and coveted; however, blatant mis-use of this site's bandwidth will not be tolerated (e.g., SPAM etc).

Additionally, healthy debate is invited; however, ad hominem and or vitriolic attacks will not be published, nor will "anonymous" criticisms. Please keep your arguments "to the issues" and present them with civility and proper decorum. -FW