Tuesday, November 08, 2011

Nuclear Weapons Websites Are In Deep Denial About UFOs

Bookmark and Share

By Robert Hastings
     Declassified U.S. government documents confirm that UFOs have repeatedly visited nuclear weapons sites—laboratories, plutonium production plants, bomb test ranges, missile warhead storage depots, ICBM launch silos—as early as December 1948.

Furthermore, KGB and Ministry of Defense documents released or leaked following the collapse of the U.S.S.R. verify that the Soviets also experienced such incursions at their nuclear facilities during the Cold War era.

In short, someone or something operating highly superior aerial craft has been monitoring and sometimes disrupting the functionality of American and Russian nuclear weapons for decades.

Moreover, the situation is quite current. According to U.S. Air Force missile maintenance technicians, a huge, cigar-shaped object was repeatedly sighted on October 23, 2010, as it maneuvered above F.E. Warren Air Force Base’s ICBM field. Coincidentally or not, on that date the base could not, for several hours, communicate with (or launch, had the need arisen) 50 of its Minuteman III missiles.

A summary of the startling incident—featuring the initial story about it in The Atlantic, which did not mention the UFO-angle—may be found at:

Over the past 38 years I have interviewed nearly 130 U.S. military veterans, most of whom were eyewitnesses to one or more UFO incursions at ICBM sites or Weapons Storage Areas (WSAs). Seven of those individuals spoke at my September 27, 2010 press conference in Washington D.C., which CNN streamed live.

The full-length video of the event is seen below:

An article containing the veterans’ affidavits as well as a small cross-section of nukes-related documents is at:

In 2008, I published a detailed summary of the situation in my 600-page book, UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites, which is still available at my website.

In the three years following the book’s publication, I have attempted to interest various nuclear weapons-related websites in publishing articles on the topic of UFOs and nukes, to no avail. My emails to the hosts go unanswered and, with rare exceptions, the blog posts I submit are rejected by the moderators. In short, there is an effective information embargo on this subject at respectable websites where one would predict great interest and debate among the collective readership.

Why is this so? Why is the topic taboo? The information I provide to these websites is drawn either from the declassified documents themselves or based on the verbatim testimony of ex-military personnel who witnessed some of the events described in those files. These are persons who were once entrusted by the U.S. government to operate Weapons of Mass Destruction, who now assert that UFOs repeatedly monitored and sometimes disrupted those key weapons systems.

Surely this authoritative information would be of interest to the experts and laypersons who regularly opine on the many nukes-related sites. Or, at least, one would think so.

The websites in question span the full spectrum, from those sponsored by nuclear proponents, to ones run by disarmament advocates; from technically-oriented sites to philosophical forums. The groups include Bulletin of The Atomic Scientists, Ploughshares Fund, Arms Control Wonk, Nuclear Weapons Free, Citizens For Global Solutions, Nuke Watch New Mexico, The Utopian, Nuclear Age Peace Foundation—to name but a few. So far, all of these have responded to the topic of UFO activity at nuclear sites as they would the plague; it is something to be avoided at all costs.

Again, I ask: Why?

How ironic that these nuclear weapons interest groups endlessly discuss the ins-and-outs of the Nuclear Age—its birth, manifestations, consequences, possible outcomes—but have thus far steadfastly ignored a central element in its existence: According to the declassified files, outside observers, technically-advanced but apparently neither American nor Russian, have doggedly monitored the nuclear arms race and, according to the military witnesses themselves, intermittently injected themselves into its six-decades-long unfolding in a most disturbing and even shocking manner—on both sides of the ocean.

Granted, at the moment, one will not find this dramatic information in the history books. And, were it not for the existence of the Freedom of Information Act, the brave candor of the military veterans involved and, to a lesser degree, the dissolution of the Soviet regime, one would not have an opportunity to review the available data regarding UFOs’ longstanding interest in nuclear weapons.

The point, however, is that one does indeed have that opportunity, if one would only set aside the pervasive anti-UFO biases that currently exist, at least for a little while, just long enough to read a few of the documents and witness affidavits.

It is my hope that this brief exposé on the baffling impasse at the nuclear interest forums will prompt a few brave souls at Plowshares, et al, to come to grips with the reality of the situation and to permit a discourse on UFO activity at nuclear weapons facilities to appear at their websites in the future.


  1. Tuesday, November 08, 2011
    Nuclear Weapons Websites Are In Deep Denial About UFOs
    Sometimes our government uses dis/misinformation “UFO’s” to cover the actions of one of the United States favored ally and to the government and the Military-Industrial Complex’ advantage.
    I have read this article with great interest, and I must add another side to the story. In the 70’s I was a Spec 5, 93E4H (MOS) assigned to the Army’s Atmospheric Science Laboratories (ASL) White Sands, New Mexico, working for the Army Materials Command and various other Defense Dept. as well as NASA and National and International Universities. Due to the materials and units we were assisting a high security clearance was required. I met some very interesting people from all branches of the military, while working with ASL at Test Centers and Proving Grounds within CONUS and Alaska and Panama.

    While waiting for the test conditions to be met, and “Young People” being young people, we had many conversations ranging from Ghosts to UFO’s as we waited. One was related to me by a Senior Air Force NCO concerning the SAC base infiltrations by supposed UFO’s during the late 60’s and early 70’s. I was informed the following:

    During this time period; the following Strategic Air Command (SAC) Northern tier bases were infiltrated by what the Government conveniently called UFO’s.

    • F.E. Warren Air Force Base; Cheyenne, Wyoming: 1 August 1965
    • Malmstrom Air Force Base; Montana; 16 March 1967
    • Malmstrom Air Force Base; 24 October 1968
    • Minot Air Force Base; 24 October 1968
    • Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri; 1968
    • McChord Air Force Base; 14 October 1972
    • Wurtsmith AFB, Michigan; 30 October 1975
    • National Combat Operations Center: Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado; October 1975
    • Loring Air Force Base, Maine; 2 November 1975
    • Malmstrom AFB, Montana; 7 November 1975
    • Falconbridge Air Force Station, North Bay, Ontario, Canada; 11 November 1975
    • F.E Warren Air Force Base; Cheyenne, Wyoming 1976

    I was advised that this was an excuse to cover the fact that these bases were actually attack by the MOSSAD, Israel’s answer to our CIA. And their target was to STEAL a Nuclear Warhead from one of our Titan or Minuteman Missiles. I was told that Security Op: Covered Wagon was instituted several times and that some of our Air Policemen were injured at several of the missile sites, and, supposedly the MOSSAD was involved in a shoot-out with US Security Forces at an Airport in Canada.

    Take it for what it’s worth. Bentwater RAF Base is probably the same thing….

  2. From Robert Hastings:

    With all due respect, chocolate, the cover story was the one fed to you. If one reviews the declassified documents available at my website, one finds an intermittent but essentially ongoing pattern of UFO activity at nuclear weapons sites going back to the late 1940s and (although as yet undocumented except by leaked testimony from missile technicians) as recently as 2010. The radar data alone confirm the presence of unknown aerial craft operating near nuke sites whose capabilities are orders of magnitude beyond than any aircraft on Earth.

  3. Chocolate: If the Mossad were to try and steal a nuke, which would be a pointless exercise since they have had nukes for decades, they would work from the inside out...after all, if they can pull off a 9-11 event it should not be a stretch to believe that they could get a nuke far easier using computer and inside connections rather than risk capture during an armed intrusion onto the most heavily guarded sites in the world.

    Remember the nuke hanging from the wing of a B-52 that was not supposed to be there? Rumor had it that Cheney wanted it to use as part of another flase flag event but it was discovered before it could be retreived and transported away. In any event, it takes complicated procedures to access the nukes we have, and it is not possible to do without orders..orders than are verified. Surely the Mossad could find a bettr way than assualting high security areas at night.

    The only possible conclusion considering the testimony and facts is that UFO's of unknown origin have on numerous occasions intruded into air space over and around nuclear missle launch sites and been witnessed on many occasions by highly reliable individuals..people unlikely to mistakenly discern what was happening around them.

    It is high time people stopped looking for possible ways out of the reality we face and accept that advanced technology and beings are intentionally visiting these secure places and most likely gathering information, and in some cases interfering with operations. UFO's have also been photographed and seen during ballistic missle launches and Shuttle missions, seemingly curious or observing for some reason.
    It may be that our crude and backward planet is a fascinating place for advanced cultures to visit and observe..but we should not forget that they have actively sought to interfere with systems, and that must be for a reason. No doubt it is dismaying for them to see us pollute and endanger what must be a very unique and rich resource amongst the black and empty vastness that seperates us from any potential peers, and when they get our attention by means of intrusion and disabling systems, we should listen and act quickly to find out why, and what to do about it.


Dear Contributor,

Your comments are greatly appreciated, and coveted; however, blatant mis-use of this site's bandwidth will not be tolerated (e.g., SPAM etc).

Additionally, healthy debate is invited; however, ad hominem and or vitriolic attacks will not be published, nor will "anonymous" criticisms. Please keep your arguments "to the issues" and present them with civility and proper decorum. -FW


Mutual UFO Network Logo