Showing posts with label Freedom of Information Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Freedom of Information Act. Show all posts

Monday, January 09, 2017

Disclosing Classified Info to the Press — With Permission

Disclosing Classified Info to the Press — With Permission

     Intelligence officials disclosed classified information to members of the press on at least three occasions in 2013, according to a National Security Agency report to Congress that was released last week under the Freedom of Information Act.
By Steven Aftergood
Secrecy News
1-4-17

See Congressional Notification — Authorized Disclosures of Classified Information to Media Personnel, NSA memorandum to the staff director, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, December 13, 2013.

The specific information that NSA gave to the unnamed reporters was not declassified. But the disclosures were not “leaks,” or unauthorized disclosures. They were, instead, authorized disclosures. For their part, the reporters agreed not to disseminate the information further.

Friday, June 13, 2014

"UFO Researchers Have Discovered, The Censorship Epidemic … Over America's Raw Radar Records"

UFO Researchers Have Discovered, The Censorship Epidemic … Over America's Raw Radar Records

Censorship on cruise control

By Billy Cox
De Void
6-12-14

     On President Obama's first day in office, the White House's 44th Temporary Occupant pledged "a new era of openness in our country" by a) signing an executive order committing the administration to transparency and b) issuing two presidential memoranda to achieve those results. Among other things, declared the duly informed National Security Archive, Freedom of Information Act requests would demand "a presumption of disclosure for government records and a hostility to the use of secrecy laws to cover up embarrassing information." It looked swell on paper, especially after the Bush regime’s 9/11 info-lockdown. But we all know how that turned out.

In March, an Associated Press analysis produced a sharp rebuke to the transparency initiative, reporting not merely bureaucratic foot-dragging on FOIA processing but an alarming backslide for taxpayers who might be curious to see what our money's buying. “Five years after Obama directed agencies to less frequently invoke a ‘deliberative process’ exception to withhold materials describing decision-making behind the scenes,” stated the AP, “the government did it anyway, a record 81,752 times.” Furthermore, The National Security Archive announced that 50 of 101 federal agencies have failed to comply with a 2007 congressional mandate to update their FOIA policies, and that 55 of those agencies “have FOIA regulations that predate and ignore President Obama's and Attorney General Holder's 2009 guidance for a ‘presumption of disclosure.’” And then came a dispiriting assessment of 15 major federal agencies from the Center For Effective Government, which graded the likes of the Social Security Administration to the State Department on FOIA processing, communications policies, and user-friendly websites. Seven of the 15 flunked. Said the Center’s CEO: “The fact that no agency achieved a top grade across all three areas illustrates the difficulty agencies are having with implementation overall.”

There are, of course, myriad possible explanations. Maybe, given budget cutbacks, there aren’t enough personnel to manage the crush of volume anymore. Maybe Obama was just kidding. Or maybe the federal culture of classification and secrecy is so pervasive and hard-wired, executive and legislative directives just don’t matter anymore.

Either way, as a handful of UFO researchers have discovered, the censorship epidemic has recently thrown a tarp over America's raw radar records. The dominoes began toppling in 2009, when the Federal Aviation Administration started sequestering ERIT data. ERIT — a computer program called the En Route Intelligence Tool — logs everything that reflects pingbacks, including a lot of chaotic junk that air traffic controllers normally don’t need to see on their screens, e.g., birds, bug swarms, false echoes, even jet contrails. ATC operators' top priority is legitimate air traffic, mapped by the National Track Analysis Program. NTAP’s real-time system filters out all the extraneous clutter and concentrates on targets that are supposed to be there, namely, aircraft with signal beacons, or transponders.

Since The Great Taboo ignores our transponder laws, UFO researchers fielding credible eyewitness reports have lately, via FOIA requests, been sifting through ERIT data, which can corroborate, or challenge, eyewitness narratives about location, speed, and direction. Traditionally, that sort of material has been an under-explored resource in getting a bigger forensic picture on UFO encounters.

“You almost never get good radar data, for a variety of reasons,” says Mark Rodeghier, director of the Center for UFO Studies in Chicago. “There’s ignorance that it could be done in the first place. Sighting reports lag behind the event. Say you get the report a week after it happened, then you’ve got to investigate it before you can determine if it’s strong enough to go after the records, and you’ve only got a couple of weeks to request the records because they’re only required to keep it in their files for so long.

“You have to use the FOIA channels judiciously. It’s not a simple process to analyze radar data, you have to know what you’re doing. And if you waste too many requests, understandably you can imagine how FOIA officies will react.”

To reiterate, the FAA began yanking ERIT records from the public domain in 2009, ostensibly because it could expose America’s radar-coverage vulnerabilities. What’s a little weird is how that vulnerability window stood wide open for a good eight years after 9/11. And nobody thought to slam it shut until researchers Glen Schulze and Robert Powell came along. In 2008, they successfully FOIA’d radar records to reconstruct the Stephenville UFO incident, which had national security implications because it involved jet fighters and a non-transpondered flight beelining directly for the no-fly zone around President Bush’s ranch in Texas. While nearby military bases claimed their radar logs had been routinely auto-purged, the FAA and National Weather Service complied with the FOIA law, and the result was one of the best-documented UFO events on record.

Among the ironies of the FAA’s blackout of ERIT records, Powell argues, is that raw data wouldn’t be of much use to evil-doers, who presumably would be more interested in seeing what pops up on ATC screens in order to find those Swiss-cheese blind spots in which to do evil. Or the evil-doers could simply fly low beneath radar coverage altogether. But here's the kicker: Until just a few months ago, UFO radar analysts found a way to bypass the FAA embargo on ERIT material. They got it from military sources, namely, the 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron (84th RADES) at Hill Air Force Base in Utah. Researchers did it discreetly, of course, rarely if ever mentioning The Great Taboo in their FOIAs. But the Stephenville case, which confirmed eyewitness accounts and forced the USAF to retract its initial assertion that it had no planes in the air that night, provided a model for future research.

Perhaps inevitably, Air Combat Command, which oversees 84 RADES from its headquarters in Langley, Va., has turned off the ERIT spigot once and for all. In a dispatch to Powell, ACC said this was a consensus decision also involving the Defense Department and the Department of Homeland Security’s Long Range Radar Joint Program Office. In asserting the ERIT data was owned by the DoD, DHS, and the FAA, the ACC stated 84 RADES has “never received or requested approval to release this information to the public,” and apparently it will not be authorized to do so. (By the way, has your head exploded from the cascading acronyms yet?)

Researchers say their requests for clarification about the new rules simply dissipate without a response at all. De Void was a little skeptical. After all, from first-hand experience, government bureaucracies at least acknowledge receipt of a media query, usually within 24 hours. So De Void passed a few concerns along to the Pentagon via its designated point person on this issue, USAF PIO Anh Trinh — questions like why did it take so long for the DoD to plug this gaping hole to potential evil-doers, how high up the chain of command did this decision-making go, etc., etc.

It’s been well over a week now without so much as an official “We got your stuff, draft a formal FOIA letter to XYZ, now flake off.” But then, when bureaucracies are free to ignore Congress and the White House, hey, what’s one lousy newspaper reporter?

Saturday, August 09, 2008

UFO Sightings in UK This Year Reach 150

Flying Saucer
By Laura Clout
The Telegraph
8-9-08

     So far this year 150 apparent 'flying saucers' have been reported to police, military bases and the Ministry of Defence, compared to just 135 for the whole of 2007, and 97 the year before.

The figures, released after a request under the Freedom of Information Act, suggest that 2008 will be a bumper year for alien activity.

Malcolm Robinson, founder of the research group Strange Phenomena Investigations said: "Something really bizarre is happening in the skies over the UK.

"I've been dealing in sightings for 30 years and we currently have something very real which mankind cannot explain."

A spokesman for the MoD said as long as sightings presented no threat to British airspace, they were not investigated further. The MoD remained 'open-minded' about aliens, he added.

Earlier this summer, recent sightings were plotted on a map of Britain. They stretched from Liverpool to Dover and from Llanelli to Derby.

Among mysterious flying objects spotted in recent months was a 'glowing' disc spotted above the M5 motorway.

Royal Navy aircraft engineer Michael Madden said he watched the UFO for three minutes before it 'zoomed off' near Weston-super-Mare in Somerset.

Earlier, in Basingstoke, witnesses claimed to have seen a fleet of 12 orange objects in the night sky for half an hour.

And in St Athan in the Vale of Glamorgan a police helicopter crew gave chase to another UFO after it appeared to veer at speed towards their aircraft.

One UFO spotter however was left red-faced after his report of a mysterious flying saucer in South Wales turned out to be nothing more other-worldly than the moon.

Monday, December 10, 2007

NASA Ordered To Turn Over 'Kecksburg UFO Files!'

Kecksburg UFO Approached By Soldiers
NASA to probe self for UFO data

By Sean D. Hamill
The Chicago Tribune
12-10-07

     KECKSBURG, Pa. - The U.S. government says nothing of note happened in this small town in the hills of southwestern Pennsylvania at 4:47 p.m. on Dec. 9, 1965. A meteor may have passed by, but no alien ship or Russian space probe fell to Earth, as many here believe.

Still, Bill Bulebush, 82, says he knows what he saw, heard and smelled, despite the doubts of the government and others in this community 40 miles southeast of Pittsburgh.

"I looked up and saw it flying overhead and it was sizzling," said Bulebush, a retired truck driver. "I found it in the woods down there [in a valley] and I got to it 15 to 20 minutes after it landed. I saw it 10 to 15 feet away from behind a big tree -- because I was worried it might blow up -- and it smelled like sulfur or rotten eggs and was shaped like a huge acorn, about the size of a VW."

Other people said that shortly afterward, dozens of Army soldiers and three members of the Air Force showed up; later that night a flatbed military truck took the object away.

Despite such accounts, the government has been "trying to make it out like we're a bunch of liars," Bulebush said. But now he and his fellow believers may have their best chance yet to prove their case.

A recent settlement in a 4-year-long Freedom of Information Act court battle requires NASA to meticulously comb its files for documents about the Kecksburg incident.

The lawsuit was filed in December 2003 in the District of Columbia by Leslie Kean, a freelance journalist, with financial support from the SciFi Channel, which ran a show that year titled "The New Roswell: Kecksburg Exposed."

Searching for answers

Kean was asked by SciFi in 2002 to find a UFO case with credible witnesses and possible physical evidence. She created the Coalition for Freedom of Information to support the effort and to look into other "unexplained aerial phenomena."

Part of Kean's own criteria, despite SciFi's title for the Kecksburg show, was to pick a case as far removed as possible from the 1947 incident in Roswell, N.M. -- thought by many to be a crashed alien spaceship but later revealed to be a top-secret research balloon.

"The types that go to Roswell and parade in the street in costumes, we try to stay far, far away from that," she said.

Kean pressed the case after she filed a Freedom of Information Act request earlier in 2003 and NASA said it couldn't find any documents related to Kecksburg. But Kean already knew the space agency, which had a program in the 1960s to recover and analyze space debris, had some documents. Stan Gordon, a UFO and Bigfoot researcher with whom Kean was working, had information he got in response to a request he sent NASA in the 1990s.

"In the beginning, they probably saw Leslie's request and thought, 'Oh, she's after UFOs,'" said her attorney, Lee Helfrich of Washington. "Maybe they just didn't treat it seriously at first."

They do now.

From frustration, action

After NASA turned over about 1,000 pages of documents that failed to adequately address Kean's request, the case boiled over on March 20 for federal Judge Emmet Sullivan, who had tried to move NASA along for more than three years.

According to a transcript, the judge angrily referred to NASA's search efforts as a "ball of yarn" that never fully answers the request, adding: "I can sense the plaintiff's frustration because I'm frustrated."

A settlement was reached Oct. 17 specifying how NASA will make a new records search and that both sides must report to Sullivan periodically, starting Dec. 17. NASA also agreed to pay Kean $50,000 in attorneys' fees and costs.

In a statement, NASA would say only that it was "conducting another records search."

This past week Kean and her attorney received the first batch of documents: 689 pages of Form 135s, which are inventory sheets that indicate what is in boxes and files in NASA's archives.

Based on a first read of the documents -- from which Kean will select files for NASA to review for any documents related to Kecksburg -- Kean said she's "cautiously optimistic" that they'll turn up something.

"I asked my attorney if she found the 'Kecksburg UFO Explained' file," Kean said with a laugh. "She said, 'Not yet.' But I'm still hopeful."

Many people in Kecksburg believe Kean's effort is just another frivolous step down the rabbit hole of fantasy.

"I wouldn't go along with the stories because it didn't happen," said Ed Myers, 81, who was chief of the Kecksburg Volunteer Fire Department in 1965 and said he didn't see the dozens of soldiers or the blue lights some people swear they saw.

Myers no longer helps his hometown fire department, a decision that began when the department encouraged UFO speculation by displaying a mock-up of the craft that Bulebush and others said they saw.

The mock-up was created in 1990 for a documentary and now sits prominently on a hillside behind the fire hall.

After years of rejecting efforts to make money off the story, the fire department hosted a wildly popular Kecksburg UFO gathering two years ago on the 40th anniversary, and began selling T-shirts, mugs, plates and hats with a picture of the flaming acorn hurtling across the sky, along with the date, Dec. 9, 1965.

Sales continue today at the Kecksburg UFO Store in the basement of the Rescue EMS headquarters house near the fire hall.

"We've made about $10,000, mostly from shirts, so far," said Ron Strueble, 64, a fire department volunteer. "We're at the point now where we can start buying some additional equipment for the trucks."

For Bulebush, the UFO store is good for the town, but it's the lawsuit that he hopes will be his validation.

"I don't have too much time in this world. I'd like to be here to see this through," he said. "I want to find out what they're holding back on us."